Cited by 44CAR-T cell therapy researchImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesT-cell and B-cell Immunology

Impact of cryopreservation on CAR T production and clinical response

Open access
Brezinger-Dayan, Karin, Itzhaki, Orit, Melnichenko, Jenny, Kubi, Adva, Zeltzer, Li-at, Jacoby, Elad, Avigdor, Abraham, Shapira Frommer, Ronnie +1 more·2022·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

Adoptive cell therapy with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells has become an efficient treatment option for patients with hematological malignancies. FDA approved CAR T products are manufactured in centralized facilities from fresh or frozen leukapheresis and the cryopreserved CAR T infusion product is shipped back to the patient. An increasing number of clinical centers produce CAR T cells on-site, which enables the use of fresh and cryopreserved PBMCs and CAR T cells. Here we determined the effect of cryopreservation on PBMCs and CD19 CAR T cells in a cohort of 118 patients treated with fresh CAR T cells and in several patients head-to-head. Cryopreserved PBMCs, obtained from leukapheresis products, contained less erythrocytes and T cells, but were sufficient to produce CAR T cells for therapy. There was no correlation between the recovery of PBMCs and the transduction efficacy, the number of CAR T cells obtained by the end of the manufacturing process, the in vitro reactivity, or the response rate to CAR T therapy. We could show that CAR T cells cryopreserved during the manufacturing process, stored and resumed expansion at a later time point, yielded sufficient cell numbers for treatment and led to complete remissions. Phenotype analysis including T cell subtypes, chemokine receptor and co-inhibitory/stimulatory molecules, revealed that fresh CAR T cells expressed significantly more TIM-3 and contained less effector T cells in comparison to their frozen counterparts. In addition, fresh CAR T infusion products demonstrated increased in vitro anti-tumor reactivity, however cryopreserved CAR T cells still showed high anti-tumor potency and specificity. The recovery of cryopreserved CAR T cells was similar in responding and non-responding patients. Although fresh CAR T infusion products exhibit higher anti-tumor reactivity, the use of frozen PBMCs as staring material and frozen CAR T infusion products seems a viable option, as frozen products still exhibit high in vitro potency and cryopreservation did not seem to affect the clinical outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2022.1024362

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fresh CAR-T cells were shown earlier to have higher in vitro antitumor activity and lesser microcellular damage than frozen CAR-T cells.

    “POC manufacturing enables the delivery of fresh CAR-T cells, which were shown earlier to have higher in vitro antitumor activity and lesser microcellular damage than the frozen,4,5”

    From Point-of-care manufacturing of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells using a closed production platform: Experiences of an academic in Thailand (2024) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Discussion reports higher in vitro anti-tumor reactivity in fresh CAR T infusion products than in cryopreserved products. The Results describe differences in cell phenotype, but do not establish that fresh CAR T cells have less microcellular damage. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [1]Maude SL Laetsch TW Buechner J Rives S Boyer M Bittencourt H. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with b-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med (2018) 378(5): 439–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709866 PMC5996391 29385370 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Neelapu SS Locke FL Bartlett NL Lekakis LJ Miklos DB Jacobson CA. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory Large b-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med (2017) 377(26): 2531–44. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707447 PMC5882485 29226797 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Raje N Berdeja J Lin Y Siegel D Jagannath S Madduri D. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med (2019) 380(18): 1726–37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1817226 PMC8202968 31042825 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Majzner RG Mackall CL. Clinical lessons learned from the first leg of the CAR T cell journey. Nat Med (2019) 25(9): 1341–55. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0564-6 31501612 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Liu H Pan C Song W Liu D Li Z Zheng L. Novel strategies for immuno-oncology breakthroughs with cell therapy. Biomark Res (2021) 9(1): 62. doi: 10.1186/s40364-021-00316-6 34332618 PMC8325826 · DOI
  6. [6]Makita S Imaizumi K Kurosawa S Tobinai K. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for b-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: opportunities and challenges. Drugs context (2019) 8: 212567. doi: 10.7573/dic.212567 30815024 PMC6385623 · DOI
  7. [7]Makita S Yoshimura K Tobinai K. Clinical development of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for b-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Cancer Sci (2017) 108(6): 1109–18. doi: 10.1111/cas.13239 PMC5480083 28301076 · DOI
  8. [8]Kansagra AJ Frey NV Bar M Laetsch TW Carpenter PA Savani BN. Clinical utilization of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CAR-T) in b-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)-an expert opinion from the European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT) and the American society for blood and marrow transplantation (ASBMT). Bone Marrow Transplant (2019) 54(11): 1868–80. doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0451-2 PMC8268756 31092900 · DOI
  9. [9]Jain T Bar M Kansagra AJ Chong EA Hashmi SK Neelapu SS. Use of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in clinical practice for Relapsed/Refractory aggressive b cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: An expert panel opinion from the American society for transplantation and cellular therapy. Biol Blood marrow Transplant (2019) 25(12): 2305–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.08.015 31446199 · DOI
  10. [10]Jacoby E Bielorai B Avigdor A Itzhaki O Hutt D Nussboim V. Locally produced CD19 CAR T cells leading to clinical remissions in medullary and extramedullary relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Hematol (2018) 93(12): 1485–92. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25274 30187944 · DOI
  11. [12]Hanley PJ. Fresh versus frozen: Effects of cryopreservation on CAR T cells. Mol Ther (2019) 27(7): 1213–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.06.001 PMC6612752 31202635 · DOI
  12. [13]Xu H Cao W Huang L Xiao M Cao Y Zhao L. Effects of cryopreservation on chimeric antigen receptor T cell functions. Cryobiology (2018) 83: 40–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2018.06.007 29908946 · DOI
  13. [14]Avigdor A Shouval R Jacoby E Davidson T Shimoni A Besser M. CAR T cells induce a complete response in refractory burkitt lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant (2018) 53(12): 1583–5. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0235-0 29795432 · DOI
  14. [15]Danylesko I Chowers G Shouval R Besser MJ Jacoby E Shimoni A. Treatment with anti CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells after antibody-based immunotherapy in adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr Res Trans Med (2020) 68(1): 17– 22. doi: 10.1016/j.retram.2019.12.001 31882377 · DOI
  15. [16]Xia L Wang Y Li T Hu X Chen Q Liu L. The clinical study on treatment of CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells in a case of refractory Richter syndrome. Cancer Med (2019) 8(6): 2930–41. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2193 PMC6558585 31050207 · DOI
  16. [17]Feldman SA Goff SL Xu H Black MA Kochenderfer JN Johnson LA. Rapid production of clinical-grade gammaretroviral vectors in expanded surface roller bottles using a “modified” step-filtration process for clearance of packaging cells. Hum Gene Ther (2011) 22(1): 107–15. doi: 10.1089/hum.2010.064 PMC3026655 20662590 · DOI
  17. [18]Kochenderfer JN Feldman SA Zhao Y Xu H Black MA Morgan RA. Construction and preclinical evaluation of an anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor. J Immunother (Hagerstown Md: 1997) (2009) 32(7): 689– 702. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e3181ac6138 PMC2747302 19561539 · DOI
  18. [19]Nicholson IC Lenton KA Little DJ Decorso T Lee FT Scott AM. Construction and characterisation of a functional CD19 specific single chain fv fragment for immunotherapy of b lineage leukaemia and lymphoma. Mol Immunol (1997) 34(16-17): 1157–65. doi: 10.1016/S0161-5890(97)00144-2 9566763 · DOI
  19. [20]Bajgain P Mucharla R Wilson J Welch D Anurathapan U Liang B. Optimizing the production of suspension cells using the G-Rex “M” series. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev (2014) 1: 14015. doi: 10.1038/mtm.2014.15 26015959 PMC4362380 · DOI
  20. [21]Itzhaki O Jacoby E Nissani A Levi M Nagler A Kubi A. Head-to-head comparison of in-house produced CD19 CAR-T cell in ALL and NHL patients. J immunother Cancer (2020) 8(1): 1–10. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2019-000148 PMC7061891 32152221 · DOI
  21. [22]Szmania S Lapteva N Garg T Greenway A Lingo J Nair B. Ex vivo-expanded natural killer cells demonstrate robust proliferation in vivo in high-risk relapsed multiple myeloma patients. J immunother (Hagerstown Md: 1997) (2015) 38(1): 24– 36. doi: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000059 PMC4352951 25415285 · DOI
  22. [23]François M Copland IB Yuan S Romieu-Mourez R Waller EK Galipeau J. Cryopreserved mesenchymal stromal cells display impaired immunosuppressive properties as a result of heat-shock response and impaired interferon-γ licensing. Cytotherapy (2012) 14(2): 147–52. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2011.623691 PMC3279133 22029655 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [24]Jackson Z Roe A Sharma AA Lopes F Talla A Kleinsorge-Block S. Automated manufacture of autologous CD19 CAR-T cells for treatment of non-hodgkin lymphoma. Front Immunol (2020) 11: 1941. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01941 32849651 PMC7427107 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [25]Zhu C Anderson AC Schubart A Xiong H Imitola J Khoury SJ. The Tim-3 ligand galectin-9 negatively regulates T helper type 1 immunity. Nat Immunol (2005) 6(12): 1245–52. doi: 10.1038/ni1271 16286920 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [26]Sakuishi K Apetoh L Sullivan JM Blazar BR Kuchroo VK Anderson AC. Targeting Tim-3 and PD-1 pathways to reverse T cell exhaustion and restore anti-tumor immunity. J Exp Med (2010) 207(10): 2187–94. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100643 PMC2947065 20819927 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [27]Fourcade J Sun Z Benallaoua M Guillaume P Luescher IF Sander C. Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J Exp Med (2010) 207(10): 2175–86. doi: 10.1084/jem.20100637 PMC2947081 20819923 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [28]Avery L Filderman J Szymczak-Workman AL Kane LP. Tim-3 co-stimulation promotes short-lived effector T cells, restricts memory precursors, and is dispensable for T cell exhaustion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2018) 115(10): 2455–60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712107115 PMC5877951 29463725 · DOI
  28. [30]Paley MA Kroy DC Odorizzi PM Johnnidis JB Dolfi DV Barnett BE. Progenitor and terminal subsets of CD8+ T cells cooperate to contain chronic viral infection. Sci (New York NY) (2012) 338(6111): 1220–5. doi: 10.1126/science.1229620 PMC3653769 23197535 · DOI
  29. [31]McLellan AD Ali Hosseini Rad SM. Chimeric antigen receptor T cell persistence and memory cell formation. Immunol Cell Biol (2019) 97(7): 664–74. doi: 10.1111/imcb.12254 31009109 · DOI
  30. [32]López-Cantillo G Urueña C Camacho BA Ramírez-Segura C. CAR-T cell performance: How to improve their persistence? Front Immunol (2022) 13: 878209. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.878209 35572525 PMC9097681 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [33]Locke FL Siddiqi T Jacobson CA Ghobadi A Ahmed S Miklos DB. Real-world outcomes of axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) for the treatment of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) by race and ethnicity. J Clin Oncol. (2022) 40, no. 16_suppl: 7571–71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.7571 · DOI
  32. [34]Kedmi M Shouval R Fried S Bomze D Fein J Cohen Z. Point-of-care anti-CD19 CAR T-cells for treatment of relapsed and refractory aggressive b-cell lymphoma. Transplant Cell Ther (2022) 28(5): 251–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.02.017 PMC9519531 35218999 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brezinger-Dayan, K., Itzhaki, O., Melnichenko, J., Kubi, A., Zeltzer, L.-A., Jacoby, E., Avigdor, A., Shapira Frommer, R., & Besser, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
Corresponding author
  • Itzhaki, Orit
  • Besser, Michal J.
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2022-10-06
Volume
12
Pages
1024362-1024362
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4302303770
Cited by
44
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
Keywords
CAR T-cell therapy, cryopreservation, CD19 CAR T cells, hematologic malignancies, leukapheresis, transduction efficiency, TIM-3, T cell exhaustion, clinical response, complete remission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review