Cited by 35TGF-β signaling in diseasesCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Loss of SMAD4 Is Associated With Poor Tumor Immunogenicity and Reduced PD-L1 Expression in Pancreatic Cancer

Open access
Principe, Daniel R., Underwood, Patrick W., Kumar, Sandeep, Timbers, Kaytlin E., Koch, Regina M., Trevino, Jose G., Munshi, Hidayatullah G., Rana, Ajay·2022·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

Transforming Growth Factor β (TGFβ) is a key mediator of immune evasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and the addition of TGFβ inhibitors in select immunotherapy regimens shows early promise. Though the TGFβ target SMAD4 is deleted in approximately 55% of PDAC tumors, the effects of SMAD4 loss on tumor immunity have yet to be fully explored. Using a combination of genomic databases and PDAC specimens, we found that tumors with loss of SMAD4 have a comparatively poor T-cell infiltrate. SMAD4 loss was also associated with a reduction in several chemokines with known roles in T-cell recruitment, which was recapitulated using knockdown of SMAD4 in PDAC cell lines. Accordingly, JURKAT T-cells were poorly attracted to conditioned media from PDAC cells with knockdown of SMAD4 and lost their ability to produce IFNγ. However, while exogenous TGFβ modestly reduced PD-L1 expression in SMAD4-intact cell lines, SMAD4 and PD-L1 positively correlated in human PDAC samples. PD-L1 status was closely related to tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, particularly IFNγ-producing T-cells, which were more abundant in SMAD4-expressing tumors. Low concentrations of IFNγ upregulated PD-L1 in tumor cells in vitro, even when administered alongside high concentrations of TGFβ. Hence, while SMAD4 may have a modest inhibitory effect on PD-L1 in tumor cells, SMAD4 indirectly promotes PD-L1 expression in the pancreatic tumor microenvironment by enhancing T-cell infiltration and IFNγ biosynthesis. These data suggest that pancreatic cancers with loss of SMAD4 represent a poorly immunogenic disease subtype, and SMAD4 status warrants further exploration as a predictive biomarker for cancer immunotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2022.806963

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SMAD4 loss in PDAC is associated with reduced lymphocyte infiltration, lower T-cell marker expression and decreased T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity.

    “SMAD4 loss in PDAC has been associated with reduced lymphocyte infiltration, lower T-cell marker expression and decreased T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity.”

    From Significance of TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and KRAS in Pancreatic Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Results section on lymphocyte infiltration reports fewer infiltrating T cells in SMAD4-loss tumors and lower expression of T-cell markers CD3E, CD3G, CD8A, and CD8B. It also reports lower expression of granzyme B and perforin, which it calls markers of T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity; it does not establish decreased cytotoxic activity itself. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In PDAC, SMAD4 mutations promote tumor progression and metastasis, induce resistance to radiotherapy and correlate with poor prognosis.

    “As aforementioned, in PDAC, SMAD4 mutations have profound implications, promoting tumor progression and metastasis, inducing resistance to radiotherapy and correlating with poor prognosis.”

    From Significance of TP53, CDKN2A, SMAD4 and KRAS in Pancreatic Cancer (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

    The Results (page unavailable) associate intact SMAD4 expression with better overall survival, and the Discussion (page unavailable) cites preclinical evidence linking SMAD4 loss to poor radiation responses. The Introduction calls SMAD4 critical for pancreatic cancer progression, but the passages do not establish that its mutations promote progression or metastasis; the radiation evidence is also narrower than a general clinical claim of radiotherapy resistance. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loss of SMAD4 impairs immune-related chemokine and cytokine synthesis, alters T-cell activation and reduces PD-L1 expression.

    “Loss of SMAD4 impaired immune-related chemokine and cytokine synthesis, altered T-cell activation and reduced PD-L1 expression.”
  • Patients with intact SMAD4 exhibit significantly better overall survival.

    “Patients with intact SMAD4 exhibited significantly better overall survival.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. [1]Hodi FS O'Day SJ McDermott DF Weber RW Sosman JA Haanen JB. Improved Survival With Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma. N Engl J Med (2010) 363: 711–23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466 PMC3549297 20525992 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Robert C Thomas L Bondarenko I O'Day S Weber J Garbe C. Ipilimumab Plus Dacarbazine for Previously Untreated Metastatic Melanoma. N Engl J Med (2011) 364: 2517–26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104621 21639810 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [3]Borghaei H Paz-Ares L Horn L Spigel DR Steins M Ready NE. Nivolumab Versus Docetaxel in Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med (2015) 373: 1627–39. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1507643 PMC5705936 26412456 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Garon EB Rizvi NA Hui R Leighl N Balmanoukian AS Eder JP. Pembrolizumab for the Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med (2015) 372: 2018–28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501824 25891174 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [5]Larkin J Chiarion-Sileni V Gonzalez R Grob JJ Cowey CL Lao CD. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma. N Engl J Med (2015) 373: 23– 34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504030 26027431 PMC5698905 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [7]Darvin P Toor SM Sasidharan Nair V Elkord E. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Recent Progress and Potential Biomarkers. Exp Mol Med (2018) 50: 1– 11. doi: 10.1038/s12276-018-0191-1 PMC6292890 30546008 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [8]Principe DR Korc M Kamath SD Munshi HG Rana A. Trials and Tribulations of Pancreatic Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancer Lett (2021) 504: 1– 14. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2021.01.031 33549709 PMC7940598 · DOI
  8. [9]Le DT Durham JN Smith KN Wang H Bartlett BR Aulakh LK. Mismatch Repair Deficiency Predicts Response of Solid Tumors to PD-1 Blockade. Science (2017) 357: 409–13. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6733 PMC5576142 28596308 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [10]Marabelle A Le DT Ascierto PA Di Giacomo AM De Jesus-Acosta A Delord JP. Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Noncolorectal High Microsatellite Instability/Mismatch Repair-Deficient Cancer: Results From the Phase II KEYNOTE-158 Study. J Clin Oncol (2020) 38: 1– 10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02105 31682550 PMC8184060 · DOI
  10. [11]Hu ZI Shia J Stadler ZK Varghese AM Capanu M Salo-Mullen E. Evaluating Mismatch Repair Deficiency in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Challenges and Recommendations. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24: 1326–36. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3099 PMC5856632 29367431 · DOI
  11. [14]Bardeesy N Cheng KH Berger JH Chu GC Pahler J Olson P. Smad4 Is Dispensable for Normal Pancreas Development Yet Critical in Progression and Tumor Biology of Pancreas Cancer. Genes Dev (2006) 20: 3130–46. doi: 10.1101/gad.1478706 PMC1635148 17114584 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [15]Hahn SA Schutte M Hoque AT Moskaluk CA da Costa LT Rozenblum E. DPC4, a Candidate Tumor Suppressor Gene at Human Chromosome 18q21.1. Science (1996) 271: 350–3. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.350 8553070 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [16]Principe DR Diaz AM Torres C Mangan RJ DeCant B McKinney R. TGFbeta Engages MEK/ERK to Differentially Regulate Benign and Malignant Pancreas Cell Function. Oncogene (2017) 36: 4336–48. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.500 PMC5537609 28368414 · DOI
  14. [17]Principe DR Doll JA Bauer J Jung B Munshi HG Bartholin L. TGF-Beta: Duality of Function Between Tumor Prevention and Carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst (2014) 106: djt369. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt369 24511106 PMC3952197 · DOI
  15. [18]Principe DR DeCant B Mascarinas E Wayne EA Diaz AM Akagi N. TGFbeta Signaling in the Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment Promotes Fibrosis and Immune Evasion to Facilitate Tumorigenesis. Cancer Res (2016) 76: 2525–39. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-1293 PMC4873388 26980767 · DOI
  16. [19]Principe DR Park A Dorman MJ Kumar S Viswakarma N Rubin J. TGFbeta Blockade Augments PD-1 Inhibition to Promote T-Cell-Mediated Regression of Pancreatic Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther (2019) 18: 613–20. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0850 PMC6397698 30587556 · DOI
  17. [20]Principe DR Narbutis M Kumar S Park A Viswakarma N Dorman MJ. Long-Term Gemcitabine Treatment Reshapes the Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment and Sensitizes Murine Carcinoma to Combination Immunotherapy. Cancer Res (2020) 80: 3101–15. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-2959 PMC7777391 32238357 · DOI
  18. [21]Principe DR Narbutis M Koch R Rana A. Frequency and Prognostic Value of Mutations Associated With the Homologous Recombination DNA Repair Pathway in a Large Pan Cancer Cohort. Sci Rep (2020) 10: 20223. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76975-6 33214570 PMC7677533 · DOI
  19. [22]Ebine K Kumar K Pham TN Shields MA Collier KA Shang M. Interplay Between Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 and BRD4 in the Regulation of PD-L1 in Pancreatic Stellate Cells. Sci Rep (2018) 8: 13225. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-31658-1 30185888 PMC6125340 · DOI
  20. [23]Tascilar M Skinner HG Rosty C Sohn T Wilentz RE Offerhaus GJ. The SMAD4 Protein and Prognosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res (2001) 7: 4115–21. 11751510
  21. [24]Zhang Y Feng X We R Derynck R. Receptor-Associated Mad Homologues Synergize as Effectors of the TGF-Beta Response. Nature (1996) 383: 168–72. doi: 10.1038/383168a0 8774881 · DOI
  22. [25]Gao G Chen J Wang D Li Q Yang X Wang J. TGF-Beta1 Facilitates TAp63alpha Protein Lysosomal Degradation to Promote Pancreatic Cancer Cell Migration. Biol (Basel) (2021) 10(7): 597. doi: 10.3390/biology10070597 PMC8301043 34203341 · DOI
  23. [26]He R Wang M Zhao C Shen M Yu Y He L. TFEB-Driven Autophagy Potentiates TGF-Beta Induced Migration in Pancreatic Cancer Cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res (2019) 38: 340. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1343-4 31387632 PMC6683473 · DOI
  24. [28]Principe DR Underwood PW Korc M Trevino JG Munshi HG Rana A. The Current Treatment Paradigm for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Barriers to Therapeutic Efficacy. Front Oncol (2021) 11: 688377. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.688377 34336673 PMC8319847 · DOI
  25. [32]Melisi D Garcia-Carbonero R Macarulla T Pezet D Deplanque G Fuchs M. Galunisertib Plus Gemcitabine vs. Gemcitabine for First-Line Treatment of Patients With Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer. Br J Cancer (2018) 119: 1208–14. doi: 10.1038/s41416-018-0246-z PMC6251034 30318515 · DOI · Paper page
  26. [33]Melisi D Oh DY Hollebecque A Calvo E Varghese A Borazanci E. Safety and Activity of the TGFbeta Receptor I Kinase Inhibitor Galunisertib Plus the Anti-PD-L1 Antibody Durvalumab in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer. J Immunother Cancer (2021) 9(3): e002068. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002068 33688022 PMC7944986 · DOI
  27. [34]Principe DR Timbers KE Atia LG Koch RM Rana A. TGFbeta Signaling in the Pancreatic Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(20): 5086. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205086 34680235 PMC8533869 · DOI
  28. [35]Brahmer JR Tykodi SS Chow LQ Hwu WJ Topalian SL Hwu P. Safety and Activity of Anti-PD-L1 Antibody in Patients With Advanced Cancer. N Engl J Med (2012) 366: 2455–65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1200694 PMC3563263 22658128 · DOI · Paper page
  29. [36]Herbst RS Soria JC Kowanetz M Fine GD Hamid O Gordon MS. Predictive Correlates of Response to the Anti-PD-L1 Antibody MPDL3280A in Cancer Patients. Nature (2014) 515: 563–7. doi: 10.1038/nature14011 PMC4836193 25428504 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [37]Patnaik A Kang SP Rasco D Papadopoulos KP Elassaiss-Schaap J Beeram M. Phase I Study of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475; Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody) in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res (2015) 21: 4286–93. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2607 25977344 · DOI
  31. [38]Wang F Xia X Yang C Shen J Mai J Kim HC. SMAD4 Gene Mutation Renders Pancreatic Cancer Resistance to Radiotherapy Through Promotion of Autophagy. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24: 3176–85. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3435 PMC6345154 29602802 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [39]Chen YW Hsiao PJ Weng CC Kuo KK Kuo TL Wu DC. SMAD4 Loss Triggers the Phenotypic Changes of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cells. BMC Cancer (2014) 14: 181. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-181 24625091 PMC4007528 · DOI
  33. [40]Goggins M Shekher M Turnacioglu K Yeo CJ Hruban RH Kern SE. Genetic Alterations of the Transforming Growth Factor Beta Receptor Genes in Pancreatic and Biliary Adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res (1998) 58: 5329–32. 9850059
  34. [41]Lin X Feng XH. Abrogation of Transforming Growth Factor-Beta Signaling in Pancreatic Cancer. World J Surg (2005) 29: 312–6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-004-7824-3 15706432 · DOI
  35. [42]Li T Wang H Xu J Li C Zhang Y Wang G. TGFBR2 Mutation Predicts Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol (2021) 13: 17588359211038477. doi: 10.1177/17588359211038477 34408796 PMC8366138 · DOI
  36. [43]Beatty GL Winograd R Evans RA Long KB Luque SL Lee JW. Exclusion of T Cells From Pancreatic Carcinomas in Mice Is Regulated by Ly6C(low) F4/80(+) Extratumoral Macrophages. Gastroenterology (2015) 149: 201–10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.010 PMC4478138 25888329 · DOI
  37. [44]Blando J Sharma A Higa MG Zhao H Vence L Yadav SS. Comparison of Immune Infiltrates in Melanoma and Pancreatic Cancer Highlights VISTA as a Potential Target in Pancreatic Cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2019) 116: 1692–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811067116 PMC6358697 30635425 · DOI · Paper page
  38. [45]DeCant BT Principe DR Guerra C Pasca di Magliano M Grippo PJ. Utilizing Past and Present Mouse Systems to Engineer More Relevant Pancreatic Cancer Models. Front Physiol (2014) 5: 464. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00464 25538623 PMC4255505 · DOI
  39. [46]Pham TND Shields MA Spaulding C Principe DR Li B Underwood PW. Preclinical Models of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Their Utility in Immunotherapy Studies. Cancers (Basel) (2021) 13(3): 440. doi: 10.3390/cancers13030440 33503832 PMC7865443 · DOI
  40. [47]Principe DR Overgaard NH Park AJ Diaz AM Torres C McKinney R. KRAS(G12D) and TP53(R167H) Cooperate to Induce Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in Sus Scrofa Pigs. Sci Rep (2018) 8: 12548. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30916-6 30135483 PMC6105629 · DOI
  41. [48]Bailey KL Carlson MA. Porcine Models of Pancreatic Cancer. Front Oncol (2019) 9: 144. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00144 30915276 PMC6423062 · DOI
  42. [49]Boas FE Nurili F Bendet A Cheleuitte-Nieves C Basturk O Askan G. Induction and Characterization of Pancreatic Cancer in a Transgenic Pig Model. PloS One (2020) 15: e0239391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239391 32956389 PMC7505440 · DOI
  43. [50]Blagih J Zani F Chakravarty P Hennequart M Pilley S Hobor S. Cancer-Specific Loss of P53 Leads to a Modulation of Myeloid and T Cell Responses. Cell Rep (2020) 30: 481– 96.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.028 31940491 PMC6963783 · DOI
  44. [51]Ying H Elpek KG Vinjamoori A Zimmerman SM Chu GC Yan H. PTEN Is a Major Tumor Suppressor in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Regulates an NF-kappaB-Cytokine Network. Cancer Discovery (2011) 1: 158–69. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0031 PMC3186945 21984975 · DOI
  45. [52]Wartenberg M Cibin S Zlobec I Vassella E Eppenberger-Castori S Terracciano L. Integrated Genomic and Immunophenotypic Classification of Pancreatic Cancer Reveals Three Distinct Subtypes With Prognostic/Predictive Significance. Clin Cancer Res (2018) 24: 4444–54. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3401 29661773 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Principe, D. R., Underwood, P. W., Kumar, S., Timbers, K. E., Koch, R. M., Trevino, J. G., Munshi, H. G., & Rana, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Principe, Daniel R.
  • Rana, Ajay
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2022-01-28
Volume
12
Pages
806963-806963
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210584761
Cited by
35
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VCU Scholars Compass (Virginia Commonwealth University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01BX004903 , IK6BX004855 , I01BX002922)
  • National Institutes of Health (F30CA236031, R01CA217907 , R21CA255291 , R01CA242003)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
SMAD4 loss, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 expression, tumor immunogenicity, T cell infiltration, TGF-beta, immune evasion, interferon-gamma, tumor microenvironment, chemokines, T cell recruitment, predictive biomarkers, cancer immunotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review