Cited by 294Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentCholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies

Galunisertib plus gemcitabine vs. gemcitabine for first-line treatment of patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer

Open access
Melisi, Davide, Garcia-Carbonero, Rocio, Macarulla, Teresa, Pezet, Denis, Deplanque, Gael, Fuchs, Martin, Trojan, Jorg, Oettle, Helmut +9 more·2018·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Galunisertib is the first-in-class, first-in-human, oral small-molecule type I transforming growth factor-beta receptor (ALK5) serine/threonine kinase inhibitor to enter clinical development. The effect of galunisertib vs. placebo in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer was determined. This was a two-part, multinational study: phase 1b was a non-randomised, open-label, multicentre, and dose-escalation study; phase 2 was a randomised, placebo- and Bayesian-augmented controlled, double-blind study in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma considered candidates for first-line chemotherapy with gemcitabine. Patients were randomised 2:1 to galunisertib–gemcitabine ( N = 104) or placebo-gemcitabine ( N = 52). Gemcitabine dose was 1000 mg/m 2 QW. Primary endpoints for phases 1b and 2, respectively, were phase 2 dose and overall survival. Secondary objectives included tolerability and biomarkers. Dose-escalation suggested a 300-mg/day dose. Primary objective was met: median survival times were 8.9 and 7.1 months for galunisertib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.79 [95% credible interval: 0.59–1.09] and posterior probability HR < 1 = 0.93). Lower baseline biomarkers macrophage inflammatory protein-1-alpha and interferon-gamma-induced protein 10 were associated with galunisertib benefit. Galunisertib–gemcitabine combination improved overall survival vs. gemcitabine in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer, with minimal added toxicity. Future exploration of galunisertib in pancreatic cancer is ongoing in combination with durvalumab.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41416-018-0246-z

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TGF-β released and activated by cancer cells, stromal fibroblasts, and/or immune cells dampens anti-tumor immunity and responses to immunotherapeutics through direct and indirect mechanisms.

    “An underlying and predominant rationale focuses on the ability of TGF-β released and activated by cancer cells, stromal fibroblasts and/or immune cells to dampen anti-tumor immunity and responses to immunotherapeutics through direct and indirect mechanisms21,23,71,145,353,354.”

    From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [353]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melisi, D., Garcia-Carbonero, R., Macarulla, T., Pezet, D., Deplanque, G., Fuchs, M., Trojan, J., Oettle, H., Kozloff, M., Cleverly, A., Smith, C., Estrem, S. T., Gueorguieva, I., Lahn, M. M. F., Blunt, A., Benhadji, K. A., & Tabernero, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (ES)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR)
  • Hôpital Riviera-Chablais (CH)
  • München Klinik Bogenhausen (DE)
  • Ingalls Memorial Hospital (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • Advaxis (United States) (US)
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
Corresponding author
Melisi, Davide
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
2018-10-15
Volume
119
Issue
10
Pages
1208-1214
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W2896652675
Cited by
294
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 12
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (19111)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
Keywords
galunisertib, gemcitabine, unresectable pancreatic cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, first-line chemotherapy, overall survival, biomarkers, macrophage inflammatory protein-1alpha, CXCL10, dose escalation
MeSH terms
Gemcitabine, Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Deoxycytidine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Placebos, Pyrazoles, Quinolines, Biomarkers, Tumor, Signal Transduction, Transforming Growth Factor beta

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review