Cited by 20Sarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Cells and MetastasisCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Association of circulating tumor cells and IMP3 expression with metastasis of osteosarcoma

Open access
Dai, Shuangwu, Shao, Xinxin, Wei, Qingzhu, Du, Shaohua, Hou, Changhe, Li, Haomiao, Jin, Dadi·2023·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

Background: Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have been identified as a prognostic biomarker of tumors such as breast cancer and nasopharyngeal carcinoma, because they are obtained through a simple and noninvasive blood draw or liquid biopsy, but its clinical significance in osteosarcoma is still unclear. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between CTCs and clinicopathological features and discussed whether CTCs could be used as a biomarker for metastasis in osteosarcoma. Methods: We enrolled 50 osteosarcoma patients with Enneking Stage IIB and Stage III and detected CTCs in 5 ml of peripheral blood samples collected from patients using the Canpatrol ® CTC detection platform. Subsequently, multiplex RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) based on various molecular markers was performed to identify and classify CTCs. The relationships between clinical pathological features and CTC counts, subtypes (epithelial type, E type; hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal type, H type; mesenchymal type, M type), and insulin-like growth factor mRNA-binding protein 3 ( IMP3 ) expression in CTCs were analyzed. Results: CTCs were detected in 86% (43/50) of the osteosarcoma patients. The CTC counts, especially the total CTCs and H-type CTCs, signifcantly differed between Enneking Stage IIB and Stage III patients ( P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the CTC count or type and other clinicopathological features ( P > 0.05). There were significant differences in the expression of IMP3 in different types of CTCs, and the IMP3 positive rates in E/H/M type CTCs were 38.4, 65.6, and 62.0%, respectively ( P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that IMP3 -positive CTC count had the best performance for diagnostic metastasis, with the largest area under the curve of 0.873 and cutoff value of four cells/5ml blood (sensitivity = 87.5%; specificity = 82.4%). Serial CTC monitoring in one patient suggested that total CTCs and H-type CTCs were associated with disease progression. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the CTCs, especially the IMP3 -positive CTCs and H/M-type CTCs, are related to the metastasis of osteosarcoma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2023.819357

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In osteosarcoma, CTC burden, phenotype, and dynamic changes have been associated with metastatic disease, treatment response, and prognosis.

    “In osteosarcoma, CTC burden, phenotype, and dynamic changes have been associated with metastatic disease, treatment response, and prognosis [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].”
  • CTC-based methods provide complementary biological information, particularly in osteosarcoma.

    “CTC-based methods provide complementary biological information, particularly in osteosarcoma, but their broader application across soft-tissue sarcomas remains limited by platform heterogeneity and uncertain prevalence [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 39 ].”
  • Broad plasma panels, CNA-based WGS, methylation-based assays, cfRNA approaches, and CTC-based strategies remain more exploratory or proof-of-concept in most sarcoma subtypes, particularly when applied to low-volume MRD or routine surveillance settings.

    “In contrast, broad plasma panels, CNA-based WGS, methylation-based assays, cfRNA approaches, and CTC-based strategies remain more exploratory or proof-of-concept in most sarcoma subtypes, particularly when applied to low-volume MRD or routine surveillance settings [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 ].”
  • CTC detection is technically difficult in mesenchymal tumors, especially when platforms rely on epithelial markers such as EpCAM or cytokeratins.

    “However, CTC detection is technically difficult in mesenchymal tumors, especially when platforms rely on epithelial markers such as EpCAM or cytokeratins.”
  • The broader application of CTC-based methods across soft-tissue sarcomas remains limited by platform heterogeneity and uncertain prevalence.

    “CTC-based methods provide complementary biological information, particularly in osteosarcoma, but their broader application across soft-tissue sarcomas remains limited by platform heterogeneity and uncertain prevalence [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 39 ].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dai, S., Shao, X., Wei, Q., Du, S., Hou, C., Li, H., & Jin, D.
Affiliations
  • Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (CN)
  • The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Li, Haomiao
  • Jin, Dadi
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2023-02-23
Volume
13
Pages
819357-819357
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321598048
Cited by
20
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
osteosarcoma, circulating tumor cells, IGF2BP3, metastasis, prognostic factors, liquid biopsy, Enneking stage, disease progression monitoring, RNA in situ hybridization, disease-free survival, overall survival, recurrence-free survival

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review