Cited by 45Family and Disability Support ResearchCerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersInfant Development and Preterm Care

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early care and support for young children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Uganda: The Baby Ubuntu feasibility trial

Open access

Abstract

Background: Early care and support provision for young children with developmental disabilities is frequently lacking, yet has potential to improve child and family outcomes, and is crucial for promoting access to healthcare and early education. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, early evidence of impact and provider costs of the Baby Ubuntu participatory, peer-facilitated, group program for young children with developmental disabilities and their caregivers in Uganda. Materials and methods: A feasibility trial, with two parallel groups, compared Baby Ubuntu with standard care. Caregivers and children, aged 6–11 months with moderate-severe neurodevelopmental impairment, were recruited and followed for 12 months. Quantitative and qualitative methods captured information on feasibility (ability to recruit), acceptability (satisfactory attendance), preliminary evidence of impact (family quality of life) and provider costs. Results: One hundred twenty-six infants (median developmental quotient, 28.7) were recruited and randomized (63 per arm) over 9 months, demonstrating feasibility; 101 (80%) completed the 12-month follow-up assessment (9 died, 12 were lost to follow up, 4 withdrew). Of 63 randomized to the intervention, 59 survived (93%); of these, 51 (86%) attended ≥6 modules meeting acceptability criteria, and 49 (83%) completed the 12 month follow-up assessment. Qualitatively, Baby Ubuntu was feasible and acceptable to caregivers and facilitators. Enabling factors included community sensitization by local champions, positive and caring attitudes of facilitators toward children with disability, peer support, and the participatory approach to learning. Among 101 (86%) surviving children seen at 12 months, mixed methods evaluation provided qualitative evidence of impact on family knowledge, skills, and attitudes, however impact on a scored family quality of life tool was inconclusive. Barriers included stigma and exclusion, poverty, and the need to manage expectations around the child’s progress. Total provider cost for delivering the program per participant was USD 232. Conclusion: A pilot feasibility trial of the Baby Ubuntu program found it to be feasible and acceptable to children, caregivers and healthcare workers in Uganda. A mixed methods evaluation provided rich programmatic learning including qualitative, but not quantitative, evidence of impact. The cost estimate represents a feasible intervention for this vulnerable group, encouraging financial sustainability at scale. Clinical trial registration: [ https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN44380971 ], identifier [ISRCTN44380971].

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fped.2022.981976

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 2018, Developmental disabilities among children younger than 5 years in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016., Lancet Glob Health., 6, e1100, 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30309-7 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2015, The Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health (2016-2030).
  3. Lawn, 2013, Beyond newborn survival: the world you are born into determines your risk of disability-free survival., Pediatr Res., 74, 1, 10.1038/pr.2013.202 · DOI
  4. Nakamanya, 2015, Maternal experiences of caring for an infant with neurological impairment after neonatal encephalopathy in Uganda: a qualitative study., Disabil Rehabil., 37, 1470, 10.3109/09638288.2014.972582 · DOI
  5. Andrews, 2022, Functional development in children with cerebral palsy in Uganda: population-based longitudinal cohort study., Dev Med Child Neurol., 64, 70, 10.1111/dmcn.14996 · DOI
  6. Adugna, 2020, Barriers and facilitators to healthcare access for children with disabilities in low and middle income sub-Saharan African countries: a scoping review., BMC Health Serv Res., 20, 10.1186/s12913-019-4822-6 · DOI
  7. Monteath-van Dok, 2013, Include Us! A Study of Disability Amongst Plan International’s Sponsored Children.
  8. 2014, The North West Cameroon Disability Study Country Report.
  9. Lee, 2013, Intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy incidence and impairment at regional and global levels for 2010 with trends from 1990., Pediatr Res., 74, 50, 10.1038/pr.2013.206 · DOI
  10. Morgan, 2016, Sensitivity and specificity of General Movements Assessment for diagnostic accuracy of detecting cerebral palsy early in an Australian context., J Paediatr Child Health., 52, 54, 10.1111/jpc.12995 · DOI
  11. Guralnick, 2006, Promoting the peer-related social development of young children with mild developmental delays: effectiveness of a comprehensive intervention., Am J Ment Retard., 111, 336, 10.1352/0895-8017(2006)111[336:PTPSDO]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wallander, 2010, Brain research to ameliorate impaired neurodevelopment–home-based intervention trial (BRAIN-HIT)., BMC Pediatr., 10, 10.1186/1471-2431-10-27 · DOI
  13. 2012, School Readiness: A Conceptual Framework.
  14. Kohli-Lynch, 2019, Early intervention for children at high risk of developmental disability in low- and middle-income countries: a narrative review., Int J Environ Res Public Health., 16, 10.3390/ijerph16224449 · DOI
  15. Tann, 2021, Surviving and thriving: early intervention for neonatal survivors with developmental disability in Uganda., Infants Young Child., 34, 17, 10.1097/IYC.0000000000000182 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Britto, 2017, Nurturing care: promoting early childhood development., Lancet., 389, 91, 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31390-3 · DOI · Paper page
  17. McConachie, 2000, A randomized controlled trial of alternative modes of service provision to young children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh., J Pediatr., 137, 769, 10.1067/mpd.2000.110135 · DOI
  18. Shin, 2009, The effects of a home-based intervention for young children with intellectual disabilities in Vietnam., J Intellect Disabil Res., 53, 339, 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01151.x · DOI
  19. Bao, 1999, Early intervention promotes intellectual development of premature infants: a preliminary report. Early intervention of premature infants cooperative research group., Chin Med J., 112, 520
  20. Gardner, 2003, A randomized controlled trial of a home-visiting intervention on cognition and behavior in term low birth weight infants., J Pediatr., 143, 634, 10.1067/S0022-3476(03)00455-4 · DOI
  21. Walker, 2004, Psychosocial intervention improves the development of term low-birth-weight infants., J Nutr., 134, 1417, 10.1093/jn/134.6.1417 · DOI
  22. Carlo, 2013, Randomized trial of early developmental intervention on outcomes in children after birth asphyxia in developing countries., J Pediatr., 162, 705, 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.09.052 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Jolley, 2022, Measuring the impact of a training intervention for early childhood centre staff on child development outcomes: findings from a cluster randomized control field trial in rural Malawi., Child Care Health Dev., 48, 736, 10.1111/cch.12981 · DOI
  24. Hamdani, 2017, WHO Parents Skills Training (PST) programme for children with developmental disorders and delays delivered by Family Volunteers in rural Pakistan: study protocol for effectiveness implementation hybrid cluster randomized controlled trial., Glob Ment Health., 4, 10.1017/gmh.2017.7 · DOI
  25. Duttine, 2019, Development and assessment of the feasibility of a Zika family support programme: a study protocol., Wellcome Open Res., 4, 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15085.1 · DOI
  26. Karim, 2021, Outcome of community-based early intervention and rehabilitation for children with cerebral palsy in rural Bangladesh: a quasi-experimental study., Brain Sci., 11, 10.3390/brainsci11091189 · DOI
  27. Al Imam, 2021, Supporting Ultra Poor People with Rehabilitation and Therapy among families of children with Cerebral Palsy in rural Bangladesh (SUPPORT CP): protocol of a randomised controlled trial., PLoS One., 16, 10.1371/journal.pone.0261148 · DOI
  28. Al Imam, 2022, A social business model of early intervention and rehabilitation for people with disability in rural Bangladesh., Brain Sci., 12, 10.3390/brainsci12020264 · DOI
  29. 2019, Situation Analysis of Children in Uganda—2019.
  30. 2016, Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016.
  31. 2015, Health Sector Development Plan 2015/16-2019/20.
  32. 2016, The National Integrated Early Childhood Development Policy Action Plan of Uganda (2016-2021).
  33. Nampijja, 2019, Randomised controlled pilot feasibility trial of an early intervention programme for young infants with neurodevelopmental impairment in Uganda: a study protocol., BMJ Open., 9, 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032705 · DOI
  34. Sadoo, 2022, Early detection and intervention for young children with early developmental disabilities in Western Uganda: a mixed-methods evaluation., BMC Pediatr., 22, 10.1186/s12887-022-03184-7 · DOI
  35. Huntley, 1996, Griffiths Mental Development Scales: From Birth to 2 Years.
  36. Gladstone, 2010, The Malawi Developmental Assessment Tool (MDAT): the creation, validation, and reliability of a tool to assess child development in rural African settings., PLoS Med., 7, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000273 · DOI
  37. Varni, 2003, The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: feasibility, reliability, and validity., Ambul Pediatr., 3, 329, 10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0329:TPAAPP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  38. Haley, 1992, Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory: Development, Standardization and Administration Manual.
  39. Abidin, 2012, Parenting Stress Index.
  40. Amankwaa, 2007, Measuring maternal responsiveness., ABNF J., 18, 4
  41. Caldwell, 1984, Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME)-Revised Edition.
  42. Smythe, 2021, Early intervention for children with developmental disabilities in low and middle-income countries - the case for action., Int Health., 13, 222, 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa044 · DOI
  43. Alexander, 1994, When expectations work: race and socioeconomic differences in school performance., Soc Psychol Q., 57, 283, 10.2307/2787156 · DOI
  44. Heiman, 2002, Parents of children with disabilities: resilience, coping, and future expectations., J. Dev Phys Disabil., 14, 159, 10.1186/s12913-016-1423-5 · DOI
  45. Ambikile, 2012, Challenges of caring for children with mental disorders: experiences and views of caregivers attending the outpatient clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam - Tanzania., Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health., 6, 10.1186/1753-2000-6-16 · DOI
  46. Yousafzai, 2014, Moving beyond prevalence studies: screening and interventions for children with disabilities in low-income and middle-income countries., Arch Dis Child., 99, 840, 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302066 · DOI
  47. Morgan, 2016, Single blind randomised controlled trial of GAME (Goals - Activity - Motor Enrichment) in infants at high risk of cerebral palsy., Res Dev Disabil., 55, 256, 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.04.005 · DOI
  48. Nastasi, 2012, The participatory intervention model: a framework for conceptualizing and promoting intervention acceptability., Sch Psychol Q., 15, 207, 10.1037/h0088785 · DOI
  49. Kohli-Lynch, 2020, Human resources and curricula content for early child development implementation: multicountry mixed methods evaluation., BMJ Open., 10, 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032134 · DOI
  50. Drummond, 2015, Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes.
  51. Vassall, 2017, Reference Case for Estimating the Costs of Global Health Services and Interventions.
  52. Vaughan, 2015, Cost-effectiveness of a Community-based Rehabilitation Programme in Nepal., Disabil CBR Incl Dev., 26, 5, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.07.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nanyunja, C., Sadoo, S., Kohli-Lynch, M., Nalugya, R., Nyonyintono, J., Muhumuza, A., Katumba, K. R., Trautner, E., Magnusson, B., Kabugo, D., Cowan, F. M., Zuurmond, M., Morgan, C., Lester, D., Seeley, J., Webb, E. L., Otai, C., Greco, G., Nampijja, M., & Tann, C. J.
Affiliations
  • MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit (UG)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Kiwoko Hospital (UG)
  • Mulago Hospital (UG)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Canadian Red Cross Society (CA)
  • African Population and Health Research Center (KE)
  • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
Tann, Cally J.
Venue
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Published
2022-09-13
Volume
10
Pages
981976-981976
ISSN
2296-2360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4295847313
Cited by
45
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • Grand Challenges Canada
  • Cerebral Palsy Alliance Research Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
early intervention, developmental disabilities, neurodevelopmental impairment, infants, caregivers, participatory approach, family quality of life, stigma, provider costs, feasibility and acceptability, Uganda, community sensitization, financial sustainability, health care access, child survival, program learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review