The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery
Open accessAbstract
Virtual screening (VS) has emerged in drug discovery as a powerful computational tool to screen large libraries of small molecules for new hits with desired properties that can then be tested experimentally. Similar to other computational approaches, VS intention is not to replace in vitro or in vivo assays, but to speed up the discovery process, to reduce the number of candidates to be tested experimentally and to rationalize their choice. Moreover, VS has become very popular in pharmaceutical companies and academic organizations due to its time-, cost-, resources-, and labor-saving. When the biological target is not known or when its 3D structure or the binding mode of ligands are not available, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis can be used in VS due to their high speed of screening and good hit rate. This approach is known as QSAR-based VS. In this method, compounds with known biological property are collected from databases and the literature. Then, after data curation, chemical descriptors are calculated on different levels of representation of molecular structure, ranging from 1D to nD, where n = 0-7, and then correlated with the biological property using machine learning methods. Once developed and validated, QSAR models are applied to predict the biological property of untested compounds. Although the experimental validation of computational hits does not represent part of the QSAR methodology, this should be performed as a final step of this approach. In this mini-review, we summarize and critically analyze the recent trends of QSAR-based VS approaches in drug discovery, and demonstrate successful applications in identifying perspective compounds with desired properties. Moreover, we provide some recommendations about best practices for the QSAR-based virtual screening along with the future perspectives of this approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (1997) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(96)00423-1 · Cited by 11,385
Colley, D. G., Bustinduy, A. L., Secor, W. E., & King, C. H. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)61949-2 · Cited by 2,444
p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure
Hansch, C., & Fujita, T. (1964) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01062a035 · Cited by 2,313 · cited 1×
“Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analysis is a ligand-based drug design method developed more than 50 years ago by Hansch and Fujita (1964).”
MethodQSAR Modeling: Where have you been? Where are you going to?
Cherkasov, A., Muratov, E. N., Fourches, D., Varnek, A., Baskin, I. I., Cronin, M., Dearden, J., Gramatica, P., Martin, Y. C., Todeschini, R., et al. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm4004285 · Cited by 2,164
Self-citationBest Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation
Tropsha, A. (2010) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201000061 · Cited by 2,024
Salmina, E., Haider, N., & Tetko, I. (2015) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21010001 · Cited by 1,041
Nichols, D. E., & Nichols, C. D. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr078224o · Cited by 895 · cited 1×
“The 5-hydroxytryptamine 1A (5-HT 1A ) serotonin receptor has been an attractive target for treating mood and anxiety disorders such as schizophrenia (Nichols and Nichols, 2008; Lacivita et al., 2012).”
BackgroundFourches, D., Muratov, E., & Tropsha, A. (2010) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci100176x · Cited by 832
Self-citationDeep learning for computational chemistry
Goh, G. B., Hodas, N. O., & Vishnu, A. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24764 · Cited by 809
Cited by
Artificial intelligence to deep learning: machine intelligence approach for drug discovery
Gupta, R., Srivastava, D., Sahu, M., Tiwari, S., Ambasta, R. K., & Kumar, P. (2021) · Molecular Diversity · doi:10.1007/s11030-021-10217-3 · Cited by 1,473
Gan, B. H., Gaynord, J., Rowe, S. M., Deingruber, T., & Spring, D. R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00729c · Cited by 511
Uncertainty quantification: Can we trust artificial intelligence in drug discovery?
Yu, J., Wang, D., & Zheng, M. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.104814 · Cited by 59
Targeting GPCRs and Their Signaling as a Therapeutic Option in Melanoma
Raymond, J. H., Aktary, Z., Larue, L., & Delmas, V. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14030706 · Cited by 20
Tse, E. G., Aithani, L., Anderson, M., Cardoso-Silva, J., Cincilla, G., Conduit, G. J., Galushka, M., Guan, D., Hallyburton, I., Irwin, B. W. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c00313 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Neves, B. J., Braga, R. C., Melo-Filho, C. C., Moreira-Filho, J. T., Muratov, E. N., & Andrade, C. H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-11-13
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1275-1275
- ISSN
- 1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2901719664
- Cited by
- 494
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 22.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphar.2018.01275
- The paper
- Neves, B. J., Braga, R. C., Melo-Filho, C. C., Moreira-Filho, J. T., Muratov, E. N., & Andrade, C. H. (2018). QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery. Frontiers in Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01275
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.