Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 494

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery

Open access
Neves, Bruno J., Braga, Rodolpho C., Melo-Filho, Cleber C., Moreira-Filho, José Teófilo, Muratov, Eugene N., Andrade, Carolina Horta·2018·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

Virtual screening (VS) has emerged in drug discovery as a powerful computational tool to screen large libraries of small molecules for new hits with desired properties that can then be tested experimentally. Similar to other computational approaches, VS intention is not to replace in vitro or in vivo assays, but to speed up the discovery process, to reduce the number of candidates to be tested experimentally and to rationalize their choice. Moreover, VS has become very popular in pharmaceutical companies and academic organizations due to its time-, cost-, resources-, and labor-saving. When the biological target is not known or when its 3D structure or the binding mode of ligands are not available, quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) analysis can be used in VS due to their high speed of screening and good hit rate. This approach is known as QSAR-based VS. In this method, compounds with known biological property are collected from databases and the literature. Then, after data curation, chemical descriptors are calculated on different levels of representation of molecular structure, ranging from 1D to nD, where n = 0-7, and then correlated with the biological property using machine learning methods. Once developed and validated, QSAR models are applied to predict the biological property of untested compounds. Although the experimental validation of computational hits does not represent part of the QSAR methodology, this should be performed as a final step of this approach. In this mini-review, we summarize and critically analyze the recent trends of QSAR-based VS approaches in drug discovery, and demonstrate successful applications in identifying perspective compounds with desired properties. Moreover, we provide some recommendations about best practices for the QSAR-based virtual screening along with the future perspectives of this approach.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2018.01275

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 494

Metadata

Authors
Neves, B. J., Braga, R. C., Melo-Filho, C. C., Moreira-Filho, J. T., Muratov, E. N., & Andrade, C. H.
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2018-11-13
Volume
9
Pages
1275-1275
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901719664
Cited by
494
References
43
FWCI
22.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fphar.2018.01275
The paper
Neves, B. J., Braga, R. C., Melo-Filho, C. C., Moreira-Filho, J. T., Muratov, E. N., & Andrade, C. H. (2018). QSAR-Based Virtual Screening: Advances and Applications in Drug Discovery. Frontiers in Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.