CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Different Liver Test Thresholds for Drug-Induced Liver Injury: Updated RUCAM versus Other Methods

Yang, Hongyi, Guo, Daihong, Xu, Yuanjie, Zhu, Man, Yao, Chong, Chen, Chao, Jia, Wangping·2019·Frontiers in Pharmacology
DOI 10.3389/fphar.2019.00816PMC PMC6658872
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2019.00816

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Chalasani, 2014, ACG Clinical Guideline: the diagnosis and management of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury, Am. J. Gastroenterol., 109, 950, 10.1038/ajg.2014.131 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chen, 2018, Development of a computer-assisted adverse drug events alarm and assessment system for hospital inpatients in China, 10.1177/2168479018810193 · DOI
  3. Cirulli, 2019, A missense variant in PTPN22 is a risk factor for drug-induced liver injury, Gastroenterology, 156, 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.034 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Dakhoul, 2018, Heavy consumption of alcohol is not associated with worse outcomes in patients with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury compared to non-drinkers, Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 16, 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.12.036 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Danan, 2016, RUCAM in drug and herb induced liver injury: the update, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17, 14, 10.3390/ijms17010014 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Donato, 2019, Stem-cell derived hepatocyte-like cells for the assessment of drug-induced liver injury, Differentiation, 106, 15, 10.1016/j.diff.2019.02.004 · DOI
  7. Fontana, 2018, The role of HLA-A*33:01 in patients with cholestatic hepatitis attributed to terbinafine, J. Hepatol., 69, 1317, 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.08.004 · DOI
  8. Fontana, 2009, Drug-Induced Liver Injury Network (DILIN) prospective study, Drug Saf., 32, 55, 10.2165/00002018-200932010-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Heidar, 2017, Consistency of commonly used orthopedic special tests of the shoulder when used with the McKenzie system of mechanical diagnosis and therapy, Musculoskelet. Sci. Pract., 33, 11, 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.10.001 · DOI
  10. Iorga, 2017, Drug-induced liver injury: cascade of events leading to cell death, apoptosis or necrosis, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 18, 1018, 10.3390/ijms18051018 · DOI
  11. Jing, 2018, Traditional Chinese medicine and herb-induced liver injury: comparison with drug-induced liver injury, J. Clin. Transl. Hepatol., 6, 57, 10.14218/JCTH.2017.00033 · DOI
  12. Lucena, 2011, Susceptibility to amoxicillin-clavulanate-induced liver injury is influenced by multiple HLA class I and II alleles, Gastroenterology, 141, 338, 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Molokhia, 2006, EUDRAGENE: European collaboration to establish a case-control DNA collection for studying the genetic basis of adverse drug reactions, Pharmacogenomics, 7, 633, 10.2217/14622416.7.4.633 · DOI
  14. Real, 2018, Drug-induced liver injury: highlights of the recent literature, Drug Saf., 42, 365, 10.1007/s40264-018-0743-2 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Robles-Diaz, 2014, Use of Hy’s law and a new composite algorithm to predict acute liver failure in patients with drug-induced liver injury, Gastroenterology, 147, 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.03.050 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Temple, 2006, Hy’s law: predicting serious hepatotoxicity, Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf., 15, 241, 10.1002/pds.1211 · DOI
  17. Teschke, 2018, Drug induced liver injury with analysis of alternative causes as confounding variables, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 84, 1467, 10.1111/bcp.13593 · DOI
  18. Teschke, 2014, Drug induced liver injury: accuracy of diagnosis in published reports, Ann. Hepatol., 13, 248, 10.1016/S1665-2681(19)30888-9 · DOI
  19. Teschke, 2016, Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and herbal hepatotoxicity: RUCAM and the role of novel diagnostic biomarkers such as MicroRNAs, Medicines (Basel), 3, 18, 10.3390/medicines3030018 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Teschke, 2013, Herbal hepatotoxicity: suspected cases assessed for alternative causes, Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 25, 1093, 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283603e89 · DOI
  21. Wang, 2018, Clinical characteristics and outcomes of traditional Chinese medicine-induced liver injury: a systematic review, Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 12, 425, 10.1080/17474124.2018.1427581 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Zhu, 2016, Hepatobiliary and pancreatic: comparison between Chinese herbal medicine and Western medicine-induced liver injury of 1985 patients, J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 31, 1476, 10.1111/jgh.13323 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Yang, H., Guo, D., Xu, Y., Zhu, M., Yao, C., Chen, C., & Jia, W.
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2019-07-19
Volume
10
ISSN
1663-9812
DOI
10.3389/fphar.2019.00816
PMC
PMC6658872
Cited by
23
References
1
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81773825)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review