Cited by 34Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeProbiotics and Fermented FoodsPneumonia and Respiratory Infections

Probiotics reduce health care cost and societal impact of flu-like respiratory tract infections in the USA: An economic modeling study

Open access
Lenoir-Wijnkoop, Irene, Merenstein, Dan, Korchagina, Daria, Broholm, Christa, Sanders, Mary Ellen, Tancredi, Dan·2019·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

Acute respiratory tract infections (RTIs) of viral origin place a substantial burden on health care resources and society. Randomized controlled trials have shown positive effects of probiotics on clinical outcomes in these commonly occurring RTIs. Two meta-analyses published by the York Health Economics Consortium (YHEC) and Cochrane reported the efficacy of probiotics in reducing incidence and duration of RTIs, number of antibiotic courses, and days absent from work. The aim of this study was to assess the potential health-economic impact of probiotics on RTI-associated events and expenses in the US primary care setting. A state-transition microsimulation model reproduced a study population representative of the US national demographics for age and gender (1/1,000 sample). RTI incidence was based on the influenza-like illness outpatient consultation rate reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) FluView. Data on vaccination, on factors that negatively impact RTI outcomes, on resource utilization, and on productivity loss were obtained from US national databases. Analyses were performed for both meta-analyses independently. Outcomes included cost savings for the health care payer, related to a reduced number of RTI episodes, less outpatient consultations, and decreased medical prescriptions as well as cost savings from a broader societal perspective related to productivity loss. The analysis showed that generalized probiotic intake in the US population for 2017-2018 would have allowed cost savings for the health care payer of 4.6 million USD based on the YHEC scenario and 373 million USD for the Cochrane scenario, by averting 19 million and 54.5 million RTI sick days, respectively, compared to no probiotics. Antibiotic prescriptions decreased with 1.39-2.16 million courses, whereas absence from work decreased by 3.58-4.2 million days when applying the YHEC and Cochrane data, respectively. When productivity loss is included, total savings for society represented 784 million or 1.4 billion USD for the YHEC and Cochrane scenarios, respectively. Subgroup analyses demonstrated an incremental benefit of probiotics in at-risk groups, which might be of relevance for targeted interventions. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the model outcomes. Our analysis demonstrated a positive impact of probiotics on the health care and economic burden of flu-like RTIs. Improved disease outcomes translated into considerable cost savings for both the payer and society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2019.00980

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Economic modeling study applied to US population, utilizing Cochrane data, concluded probiotic use could achieve >54 million fewer days of infection, >2 million averted antibiotic courses, and >4 million avoided missed work days.

    “Additionally, an economic modeling study applied to the US population, utilizing this same Cochrane data, concluded that probiotic use could achieve >54 million fewer days of infection, >2 million averted antibiotic courses, and >4 million avoided missed work days (Lenoir-Wijnkoop et al., 2019).”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Lenoir-Wijnkoop et al., 2019

  • Benefit in cost savings translated to US population only would represent approximately 1.4 billion USD annually.

    “The benefit of this in terms of cost savings, translated to the US population only, would represent approximately 1.4 billion USD annually.”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Lenoir-Wijnkoop et al., 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dasaraju P. V. Liu C. (1996). “Infections of the Respiratory System,” editor. Source Medical Microbiology. 4th edition. Medical Microbiology. Dasaraju PV Liu C. Editors In: Baron S1 21413304

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lenoir-Wijnkoop, I., Merenstein, D., Korchagina, D., Broholm, C., Sanders, M. E., & Tancredi, D.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • IQVIA (France) (FR)
  • Chr. Hansen (Denmark) (DK)
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2019-08-28
Volume
10
Pages
1182-1182
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2966785525
Cited by
34
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Keywords
probiotics, acute respiratory infections, influenza-like illness, economic burden, health care costs, productivity loss, antibiotic prescribing, absenteeism, primary care, societal cost savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review