Cited by 142Probiotics and Fermented FoodsImmune responses and vaccinationsAquaculture disease management and microbiota

The influence of probiotics on vaccine responses—A systematic review

Zimmermann, Petra, Curtis, Nigel·2018·Vaccine

Abstract

The immunomodulatory effects of probiotics may influence the response to vaccines. We systematically reviewed prospective randomised placebo-controlled studies in humans that have investigated the effect of probiotics on humoral vaccine responses. We found 26 studies, involving 3812 participants, investigating the effect of 40 different probiotic strains on the response to 17 different vaccines. A beneficial effect of probiotics was reported in about half of the studies. The evidence for a beneficial effect of probiotics on vaccine response was strongest for oral vaccinations and for parenteral influenza vaccination. However, there was substantial variation between studies in the choice of probiotic, strain, dose, viability, purity, and duration and timing of administration. The one study that investigated the effect of probiotic administration to mothers during pregnancy found lower vaccine responses in their infants. The studies in our review suggest that probiotics offer a relatively cheap intervention to improve vaccine efficacy and duration of protection. Future studies should focus on establishing optimal strains, doses and timing of administration in relation to vaccination.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.069

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Certain probiotics can enhance the immune system's response to influenza vaccination, which increases the potential benefit for the elderly, in whom the response to influenza vaccination (seroconversion) is impaired.

    “The researchers found evidence suggesting that certain probiotics can enhance the immune system’s response to influenza vaccination, which increases the potential benefit for the elderly, in whom the response to influenza vaccination (seroconversion) is impaired [179].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harris, 2016, The infant gut microbiome correlates significantly with rotavirus vaccine response in rural Ghana, J Infect Dis
  2. Redondo, 2017, Evaluation of Lactobacillus coryniformis CECT5711 strain as a coadjuvant in a vaccination process: a randomised clinical trial in healthy adults, Nutrition and Metabolism., 14

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zimmermann, P., & Curtis, N.
Affiliations
Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Zimmermann, Petra
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
207-213
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2755772860
Cited by
142
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Keywords
probiotics, vaccine response, humoral immunity, immunomodulation, oral immunization, influenza vaccination, probiotic strains, vaccine efficacy, duration of protection
MeSH terms
Humans, Placebos, Vaccines, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Probiotics, Immunity, Humoral

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review