Cited by 6Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmacy and Medical PracticesPain Management and Opioid Use

Case Report: The Complexities of Managing Medications and the Importance of Deprescribing Anticholinergics in Older Adults

Open access
Elliott, Taylor, Eckmann, Lynne, Moga, Daniela C.·2021·Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract

Potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medications (including over-the-counter products), polypharmacy, and the existence of communication barriers among members of the interprofessional team frequently contribute to clinical complexity in older adults. We present the case of a frail 86-year old female from the perspective of a community pharmacist managing outpatient medications and transitions of care. CD’s past medical history is significant for dementia, multiple falls, recurrent urinary tract infections, depression, cardiac arrhythmia, macular degeneration, chronic pain, depression, and cerebrovascular disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphar.2021.584667

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Carers' knowledge (e.g., health literacy, the patient's care needs) was linked to their experience of carer burden, and use of urgent care after returning home, and contributed to the ways they engaged with information provided at discharge.

    “Carers’ knowledge (e.g., health literacy, the patient’s care needs) was linked to their experience of carer burden, and use of urgent care after returning home, and contributed to the ways they engaged with information provided at discharge [43, 44, 57, 59, 60, 64, 66, 67].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Use of different electronic health record systems between providers presented an additional communication barrier, further limiting the transfer of diagnosis information.

    “Use of different electronic health record systems between providers presented an additional communication barrier, further limiting the transfer of diagnosis information [45, 50, 53, 66].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Discussion (page not available) says that EHR systems did not interface, making timely communication of necessary information among the patient’s providers nearly impossible. The Limitations section adds that the pharmacist could not access care notes and lab results, but the paper does not specifically identify transfer of diagnosis information as the problem. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Healthcare professionals working outside of geriatric care were often unaware of dementia diagnoses.

    “As a result, HCPs working outside of geriatric care were often unaware of dementia diagnoses (CMOC14) [50, 53, 59, 66, 79, 86, 89].”

    From Do hospital-to-home transitions work for older adults with multiple long-term conditions including dementia? A realist review (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Introduction identifies one patient as having diagnosed dementia. The Discussion describes communication difficulties among her healthcare providers, but does not say that providers outside geriatric care were unaware of her diagnosis or that this often occurred. Searches for provider awareness of dementia diagnoses found no passage addressing that point. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Elliott, T., Eckmann, L., & Moga, D. C.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Moga, Daniela C.
Venue
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Published
2021-04-16
Volume
12
Pages
584667-584667
ISSN
1663-9812 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3152691811
Cited by
6
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG054130)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
potentially inappropriate medications, polypharmacy, older adults, frailty, community pharmacy, care transitions, interprofessional communication, dementia, falls, urinary tract infection, medication management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review