Cited by 3,163Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPharmaceutical studies and practicesPharmacy and Medical Practices

American Geriatrics Society 2019 Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults

By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel·2019·Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

Abstract

The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Beers Criteria® (AGS Beers Criteria®) for Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) Use in Older Adults are widely used by clinicians, educators, researchers, healthcare administrators, and regulators. Since 2011, the AGS has been the steward of the criteria and has produced updates on a 3‐year cycle. The AGS Beers Criteria® is an explicit list of PIMs that are typically best avoided by older adults in most circumstances or under specific situations, such as in certain diseases or conditions. For the 2019 update, an interdisciplinary expert panel reviewed the evidence published since the last update (2015) to determine if new criteria should be added or if existing criteria should be removed or undergo changes to their recommendation, rationale, level of evidence, or strength of recommendation. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:674–694, 2019.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jgs.15767

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Awareness of drug interaction effects is a difficult and growing issue, particularly in geriatrics.

    “Awareness of drug interaction effects is a difficult and growing issue181–184, particularly in geriatrics, which gave rise to Beer’s criteria185.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel
Affiliations
American Geriatrics Society (US)
Corresponding author
By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel
Venue
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-01-29
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
674-694
ISSN
  • 0002-8614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5415
OpenAlex
W4241984066
Cited by
3,163
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 150 · 2025: 214 · 2024: 413 · 2023: 581 · 2022: 622 · 2021: 595 · 2020: 437 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
236.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
potentially inappropriate medications, older adults, Beers criteria, drug safety, polypharmacy, inappropriate medication use, expert panel review, strength of recommendation, level of evidence
MeSH terms
Potentially Inappropriate Medication List, Aged, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review