Cited by 6Human-Automation Interaction and SafetyUsability and User Interface DesignSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

JSwarm: A Jingulu-Inspired Human-AI-Teaming Language for Context-Aware Swarm Guidance

Open access
Abbass, Hussein A., Petraki, Eleni, Hunjet, Robert·2022·Frontiers in Physics

Abstract

Bi-directional communication between humans and swarm systems begs for efficient languages to communicate information between the humans and the Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled agents in a manner that is most appropriate for the context. We discuss the criteria for effective teaming and functional bi-directional communication between humans and AI, and the design choices required to create effective languages. We then present a human-AI-teaming communication language inspired by the Australian Aboriginal language of Jingulu, which we call JSwarm. We present the motivation and structure of the language. An example is used to demonstrate how the language operates for a shepherding swarm guidance task.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphy.2022.944064

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The historical alliance between colonialism, capitalism, and research practices involved traditional knowledges being extracted from communities to serve Western science and commerce at the expense of those communities.

    “We are mindful of the historical alliance between colonialism, capitalism, and research practices where traditional knowledges were extracted from communities to serve Western science and commerce at the expense of those communities (e.g., Abbass et al. 2022).”

    From Abundant intelligences: placing AI within Indigenous knowledge frameworks (2025) · cites this paper as Abbass et al. 2022

    Sections 2.1–2.2 describe Aboriginal languages and explain how the authors drew on Jingulu grammar for an AI-teaming language. They do not address a historical alliance between colonialism, capitalism, and research, or say that traditional knowledge was extracted for Western science and commerce at communities’ expense. Searches for those concepts and for Indigenous-knowledge appropriation found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Coulmas F. Sociolinguistics: The Study of Speakers' Choices. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (2013).
  2. Bocklisch T, Faulkner J, Pawlowski N, Nichol A. Rasa: Open Source Language Understanding and Dialogue Management. arXiv preprint (2017).
  3. Simpson J. Warlpiri Morpho-Syntax: A Lexicalist Approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media Dordrecht (1991).
  4. Reynolds CW. Flocks, Herds and Schools: A Distributed Behavioral Model. SIGGRAPH Comput Graph (1987) 21:25-34. doi:10.1145/280811.28100810. 1145/37402.37406 · DOI
  5. Kalantar S, Zimmer U. A Formation Control Approach to Adaptation of Contour-Shaped Robotic Formations. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems; 09-15 October 2006;
  6. Nalepka P, Kallen RW, Chemero A, Saltzman E, Richardson MJ. Herd Those Sheep: Emergent Multiagent Coordination and Behavioral-Mode Switching. Psychol Sci (2017) 28:630-50. doi:10.1177/0956797617692107 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hepworth AJ, Baxter DP, Hussein A, Yaxley KJ, Debie E, Abbass HA. Human- swarm-teaming Transparency and Trust Architecture. IEEE/CAA J Automatica Sinica (2020) 8:1281-95.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abbass, H. A., Petraki, E., & Hunjet, R.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Canberra (AU)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
  • Defence Science and Technology Group (AU)
Corresponding author
Abbass, Hussein A.
Venue
Frontiers in Physics
Published
2022-07-14
Volume
10
ISSN
2296-424X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285389911
Cited by
6
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Office of Naval Research Global (N62909-18-1-2140)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
human-AI teaming, Aboriginal languages, context-aware communication, two-way communication, swarm robotics, shepherding, language design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review