Cited by 87Action Observation and SynchronizationDistributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Herd Those Sheep: Emergent Multiagent Coordination and Behavioral-Mode Switching

Open access
Nalepka, Patrick, Kallen, Rachel W., Chemero, Anthony, Saltzman, Elliot, Richardson, Michael J.·2017·Psychological Science

Abstract

Effectively coordinating one’s behaviors with those of others is essential for successful multiagent activity. In recent years, increased attention has been given to understanding the dynamical principles that underlie such coordination because of a growing interest in behavioral synchrony and complex-systems phenomena. Here, we examined the behavioral dynamics of a novel, multiagent shepherding task, in which pairs of individuals had to corral small herds of virtual sheep in the center of a virtual game field. Initially, all pairs adopted a complementary, search-and-recover mode of behavioral coordination, in which both members corralled sheep predominantly on their own sides of the field. Over the course of game play, however, a significant number of pairs spontaneously discovered a more effective mode of behavior: coupled oscillatory containment, in which both members synchronously oscillated around the sheep. Analysis and modeling revealed that both modes were defined by the task’s underlying dynamics and, moreover, reflected context-specific realizations of the lawful dynamics that define functional shepherding behavior more generally.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0956797617692107

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals in social settings that involve cooperation quickly and automatically converge to synchrony.

    “Behaviorally, individuals in social settings that involve cooperation have been shown to quickly and automatically converge to synchrony – as was the case in a “sheep herding” game in which dyads distinctly shifted from asynchrony to synchrony, which allowed for successful completion of the game68.”

    From Physiological and Behavioral Synchrony Predict Group Cohesion and Performance (2020) · cites this paper as [68]

    The paper’s background discussion describes spontaneous synchronization in some interpersonal rhythmic interactions, and its Results report in-phase coordination in some cooperative shepherding trials. But the Results also show that many pairs used a different strategy, while the synchronized strategy often emerged after multiple trials. The paper does not establish that people in cooperative social settings generally converge to synchrony quickly and automatically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Bennett B Trafankowski M 2012 A Comparative investigation of herding algorithms Proc. Symp. on Understanding and Modelling Collective Phenomena (UMoCoP) 33 38
  2. Kelso JAS 1995 Dynamic patterns Cambridge, MA MIT Press
  3. Sebanz N Knoblich G 2009 Prediction in Joint action: What, when, and where Topics in Cognitive Science 1 353 367 25164938

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nalepka, P., Kallen, R. W., Chemero, A., Saltzman, E., & Richardson, M. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Michael J.
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2017-04-04
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
630-650
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2605353781
Cited by
87
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01- GM105045)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
multi-agent coordination, behavioral synchrony, emergent coordination, task dynamics, functional behavior, complex systems
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Attention, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Models, Psychological, Sheep, Social Behavior, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review