Cited by 118Insect and Arachnid Ecology and BehaviorNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchPrimate Behavior and Ecology

An exploration of the social brain hypothesis in insects.

Open access
Lihoreau, Mathieu, Latty, Tanya, Chittka, Lars·2012·Frontiers in Physiology

Abstract

The "social brain hypothesis" posits that the cognitive demands of sociality have driven the evolution of substantially enlarged brains in primates and some other mammals. Whether such reasoning can apply to all social animals is an open question. Here we examine the evolutionary relationships between sociality, cognition, and brain size in insects, a taxonomic group characterized by an extreme sophistication of social behaviors and relatively simple nervous systems. We discuss the application of the social brain hypothesis in this group, based on comparative studies of brain volumes across species exhibiting various levels of social complexity. We illustrate how some of the major behavioral innovations of social insects may in fact require little information-processing and minor adjustments of neural circuitry, thus potentially selecting for more specialized rather than bigger brains. We argue that future work aiming to understand how animal behavior, cognition, and brains are shaped by the environment (including social interactions) should focus on brain functions and identify neural circuitry correlates of social tasks, not only brain sizes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2012.00442

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Insect colony organization may involve selection for either smaller, neurally differentiated worker brains or larger brains able to metabolically offset increased production and operation costs.

    “insect colony organization may involve selection for either smaller, neurally differentiated worker brains (Lihoreau et al., 2012;Riveros et al., 2012;O'Donnell et al., 2015;Feinerman and Traniello, 2016) or larger brains (Wehner et al., 2007) able to metabolically offset increased production and operation costs (Kamhi et al., 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Chittka L. Schorn J. de Souza J. M. Ventura D. F. Camargo J. M. F. (1997). “The nest entrance signal of the Amazonian bees Partamona pearsoni – a case where insects design their own flight targets,” in Proceedings of the Colloquia on Social Insects, ed. Kipyatkov V. E. Petersburg St. 107– 116
  2. Seeley T. D. (2010). Honeybee Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lihoreau, M., Latty, T., & Chittka, L.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Lihoreau, Mathieu
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2012
Volume
3
Pages
442-442
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169198389
Cited by
118
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
social brain hypothesis, insect sociality, brain size, social complexity, insect cognition, neural circuits, evolution of social behavior, comparative neuroanatomy, brain function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review