Cited by 164Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

Muscle Adaptations to High-Load Training and Very Low-Load Training With and Without Blood Flow Restriction

Open access
Jessee, Matthew B., Buckner, Samuel L., Mouser, J. Grant, Mattocks, Kevin T., Dankel, Scott J., Abe, Takashi, Bell, Zachary W., Bentley, John P. +1 more·2018·Frontiers in Physiology

Abstract

An inability to lift loads great enough to disrupt muscular blood flow may impair the ability to fatigue muscles, compromising the hypertrophic response. It remains unknown what level of blood flow restriction (BFR) pressure, if any, is necessary to reach failure at very low-loads (i.e., 15%1RM). The purpose of this study was to investigate muscular adaptations following resistance training with a very low-load alone (15/0), with moderate BFR (15/40), or with high BFR (15/80), and compare them to traditional high-load (70/0) resistance training. Using a within/between subject design, healthy young participants (n=40) performed four sets of unilateral knee extension to failure (up to 90 repetitions/set), twice per week for eight weeks. Data presented as mean change (95% CI). There was a condition by time interaction for 1RM (p<.001), which increased for 70/0 [3.15 (2.04,4.25) kg] only. A condition by time interaction (p=.028) revealed greater changes in endurance for 15/80 [6 (4,8) repetitions] compared to 15/0 [4 (2,6) repetitions] and 70/0 [4 (2,5) repetitions]. There was a main effect of time for isometric MVC [change = 10.51 (3.87,17.16) Nm, p=.002] and isokinetic MVC at 180/second [change = 8.61 (5.54,11.68) Nm, p<.001], however there was no change in isokinetic MVC at 60/second [2.45 (-1.84,6.74) Nm, p=.261]. Anterior and lateral muscle thickness was assessed at 30, 40, 50, and 60% of the upper leg. There was no condition by time interaction for muscle thickness sites (all p≥.313). There was a main effect of time for all sites, with increases over time (all p<.001). With the exception of the 30% lateral site (p=.059) there was also a main effect of condition (all p<.001). Generally, 70/0 was greater. Average weekly volume increased for all conditions across the eight weeks, and was greatest for 70/0 followed by 15/0, 15/40, then 15/80. With the exception of 1RM, changes in strength and muscle size are similar regardless of load or restriction. The workload required to elicit these changes lowered with increased BFR pressure. These findings may be pertinent to rehabilitative settings, future research, and program design.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2018.01448

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies in which local muscular endurance testing is based on pre-study 1RM tend to refute the benefit of low-load training for this outcome.

    “studies in which local muscular endurance testing is based on pre-study 1RM tend to refute the benefit of low-load training for this outcome.”

    From Loading recommendations for muscle strength, hypertrophy, and local endurance: a re-examination of the repetition continuum. (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Methods (Endurance; page not provided) confirm that endurance was tested at 42.5% of pre-training 1RM. But the Results (Endurance; page not provided) report significant increases in endurance in every low-load condition, with the high-BFR low-load condition improving more than high-load training. This study therefore does not refute a benefit of low-load training for endurance. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findings on isokinetic strength are conflicting; some studies show a benefit of heavy load training, others show a benefit to low-load training, and yet others show no differences between conditions.

    “the findings from available evidence are conflicting; some studies show a benefit of heavy load training [27,28], others show a benefit to low-load training [29] and yet others show no differences between conditions on this metric [30,31].”
  • Some studies evaluating the effects of different loading schemes on muscular endurance used pre-intervention (baseline) 1RM values to determine load for endurance tests, whereas others used post-intervention values.

    “some studies that evaluated the effects of training with different loading schemes on muscular endurance used the pre-intervention (baseline) 1RM values to determine load for the endurance tests, whereas others used post-intervention values [20,31].”
  • Jessee et al. [31] showed similar increases in relative muscular endurance assessed at 42.5% of the pre-test 1RM in the unilateral knee extension following an 8-week training program using loads of either 15% or 70% 1RM.

    “Jessee et al. [31] showed similar increases in relative muscular endurance assessed at 42.5% of the pre-test 1RM in the unilateral knee extension following performance of an 8-week training program using loads of either 15% or 70% 1RM.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Buckner S. L. Dankel S. J. Mattocks K. T. Jessee M. B. Mouser J. G. Counts B. R. (2017a). Differentiating swelling and hypertrophy through indirect assessment of muscle damage in untrained men following repeated bouts of resistance exercise. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 117 213– 224. 10.1007/s00421-016-3521-9 28012037 · DOI
  2. Buckner S. L. Jessee M. B. Mattocks K. T. Mouser J. G. Counts B. R. Dankel S. J. (2017b). Determining strength: a case for multiple methods of measurement. Sports Med. 47 193– 195. 10.1007/s40279-016-0580-3 27380100 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Burd N. A. Andrews R. J. West D. W. Little J. P. Cochran A. J. Hector A. J. (2012). Muscle time under tension during resistance exercise stimulates differential muscle protein sub-fractional synthetic responses in men. J. Physiol. 590 351– 362. 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.221200 22106173 PMC3285070 · DOI
  4. Counts B. R. Dankel S. J. Barnett B. E. Kim D. Mouser J. G. Allen K. M. (2016). Influence of relative blood flow restriction pressure on muscle activation and muscle adaptation. Muscle Nerve 53 438– 445. 10.1002/mus.24756 26137897 · DOI
  5. Dankel S. J. Jessee M. B. Mattocks K. T. Buckner S. L. Mouser J. G. Bell Z. W. (2018). Perceptual and arterial occlusion responses to very low load blood flow restricted exercise performed to volitional failure. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 10.1111/cpf.12535 [Epub ahead of print]. 29938892 · DOI
  6. Dankel S. J. Jessee M. B. Mattocks K. T. Mouser J. G. Counts B. R. Buckner S. L. (2016). Training to fatigue: the answer for standardization when assessing muscle hypertrophy? Sports Med. 47 1021– 1027. 10.1007/s40279-016-0633-7 27677915 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fahs C. A. Loenneke J. P. Thiebaud R. S. Rossow L. M. Kim D. Abe T. (2015). Muscular adaptations to fatiguing exercise with and without blood flow restriction. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 35 167– 176. 10.1111/cpf.12141 24612120 · DOI
  8. Farup J. de Paoli F. Bjerg K. Riis S. Ringgard S. Vissing K. (2015). Blood flow restricted and traditional resistance training performed to fatigue produce equal muscle hypertrophy. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 25 754– 763. 10.1111/sms.12396 25603897 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Ferguson R. A. Hunt J. E. A. Lewis M. P. Martin N. R. W. Player D. J. Stangier C. (2018). The acute angiogenic signalling response to low-load resistance exercise with blood flow restriction. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 18 397– 406. 10.1080/17461391.2017.1422281 29343183 · DOI
  10. Ganesan G. Cotter J. A. Reuland W. Cerussi A. E. Tromberg B. J. Galassetti P. (2015). Effect of blood flow restriction on tissue oxygenation during knee extension. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 47 185– 193. 10.1249/mss.0000000000000393 24870580 PMC4246015 · DOI
  11. Holm L. Reitelseder S. Pedersen T. G. Doessing S. Petersen S. G. Flyvbjerg A. (2008). Changes in muscle size and MHC composition in response to resistance exercise with heavy and light loading intensity. J. Appl. Physiol. 105 1454– 1461. 10.1152/japplphysiol.90538.2008 18787090 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hunter S. K. Enoka R. M. (2001). Sex differences in the fatigability of arm muscles depends on absolute force during isometric contractions. J. Appl. Physiol. 91 2686– 2694. 11717235
  13. Jessee M. B. Dankel S. J. Buckner S. L. Mouser J. G. Mattocks K. T. Loenneke J. P. (2017). The cardiovascular and perceptual response to very low load blood flow restricted exercise. Int. J. Sports Med. 38 597– 603. 10.1055/s-0043-109555 28651256 · DOI
  14. Kacin A. Strazar K. (2011). Frequent low-load ischemic resistance exercise to failure enhances muscle oxygen delivery and endurance capacity. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 21 e231– e241. 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01260.x 21385216 · DOI
  15. Larkin K. A. Macneil R. G. Dirain M. Sandesara B. Manini T. M. Buford T. W. (2012). Blood flow restriction enhances post-resistance exercise angiogenic gene expression. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44 2077– 2083. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182625928 22677927 PMC3633075 · DOI
  16. Lasevicius T. Ugrinowitsch C. Schoenfeld B. J. Roschel H. Tavares L. D. De Souza E. O. (2018). Effects of different intensities of resistance training with equated volume load on muscle strength and hypertrophy. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 18 772– 780. 10.1080/17461391.2018.1450898 29564973 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Laurentino G. C. Ugrinowitsch C. Roschel H. Aoki M. S. Soares A. G. Neves M. (2012). Strength training with blood flow restriction diminishes myostatin gene expression. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 44 406– 412. 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318233b4bc 21900845 · DOI
  18. Lixandrão M. E. Ugrinowitsch C. Berton R. Vechin F. C. Conceição M. S. Damas F. (2018). Magnitude of muscle strength and mass adaptations between high-load resistance training versus low-load resistance training associated with blood-flow restriction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 48 361– 378. 10.1007/s40279-017-0795-y 29043659 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lixandrao M. E. Ugrinowitsch C. Laurentino G. Libardi C. A. Aihara A. Y. Cardoso F. N. (2015). Effects of exercise intensity and occlusion pressure after 12 weeks of resistance training with blood-flow restriction. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 115 2471– 2480. 10.1007/s00421-015-3253-2 26323350 · DOI
  20. MacInnis M. J. McGlory C. Gibala M. J. Phillips S. M. (2017). Investigating human skeletal muscle physiology with unilateral exercise models: when one limb is more powerful than two. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 42 563– 570. 10.1139/apnm-2016-0645 28177712 · DOI
  21. Motykie G. D. Zebala L. P. Caprini J. A. Lee C. E. Arcelus J. I. Reyna J. J. (2000). A guide to venous thromboembolism risk factor assessment. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 9 253– 262. 10728025
  22. Shinohara M. Kouzaki M. Yoshihisa T. Fukunaga T. (1998). Efficacy of tourniquet ischemia for strength training with low resistance. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 77 189– 191. 9459541
  23. Sugaya M. Yasuda T. Suga T. Okita K. Abe T. (2011). Change in intramuscular inorganic phosphate during multiple sets of blood flow-restricted low-intensity exercise. Clin. Physiol. Funct. Imaging 31 411– 413. 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01033.x 21771263 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jessee, M. B., Buckner, S. L., Mouser, J. G., Mattocks, K. T., Dankel, S. J., Abe, T., Bell, Z. W., Bentley, J. P., & Loenneke, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Mississippi (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Troy University (US)
  • Lindenwood University (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Loenneke, Jeremy P.
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2018-10-16
Volume
9
Pages
1448-1448
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893001864
Cited by
164
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 15
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
blood flow restriction training, high-load resistance training, muscle hypertrophy, muscular endurance, knee extension, muscle thickness, isokinetic strength, one-repetition maximum, muscle fatigue, muscle blood flow, muscle fiber cross-sectional area, muscle fiber diameter, muscle fiber length

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review