Cited by 14Muscle activation and electromyography studiesSports Performance and TrainingShoulder Injury and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Front vs Back and Barbell vs Machine Overhead Press: An Electromyographic Analysis and Implications For Resistance Training

Open access

Abstract

Overhead press is commonly performed to reinforce the muscles surrounding the shoulders. However, many overhead press variations can be executed, thus varying the stimuli to each muscle. Therefore, the current study compared the muscles excitation during overhead press performed with the barbell passing in front or behind the head or using a shoulder press machine. Eight competitive bodybuilders performed in random order front (front-BMP) or back barbell military press (back-BMP), and front (front-MSP) with neutral handgrip or back machine shoulder press (back-MSP). Normalized surface electromyographic root mean square (RMS) of anterior, medial and posterior deltoid, upper trapezius, pectoralis major and triceps brachii was recorded during both the ascending and descending phases. During the ascending phase, anterior deltoid showed greater RMS in back-BMP than back-MSP [ES: 1.42, (95% confidence interval 0.32/2.51)]. Medial deltoid showed greater RMS in back-BMP than front-BMP [ES: 3.68 (2.07/5.29)], and back-MSP [ES: 7.51 (4.73/10.29)]. Posterior deltoid showed greater RMS in back-BMP than front-BMP [ES: 9.00 (5.73/12.27)]. Pectoralis major showed greater RMS in front-BMP than back-BMP [ES: 3.11 (1.65–4.56)] and in front-MSP than back-MSP [ES: 20.52 (13.34/27.70)]. During the descending phase, anterior deltoid was more excited in back-BMP compared to front-BMP [ES: 7.66 (4.83/10.49). Medial deltoid showed greater RMS in back-BMP than front-BMP [ES: 4.56 (2.70/6.42)]. Posterior deltoid showed greater RMS in back-BMP than front-BMP [ES: 8.65 (5.50/11.80)]. Pectoralis major showed greater RMS in front-BMP than back-BMP [ES: 4.20 (2.44/5.95)]. No between-exercise difference was observed for upper trapezius. Performing back overhead press enhances the excitation of medial and posterior and partly anterior deltoid, while front overhead favors pectoralis major. Overhead press performed using barbell excites muscles more than using machine to stabilize the trajectory of the external load. Different variations of overhead press appear to provide different stimuli to the shoulder muscles and may be used accordingly during the training routine.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fphys.2022.825880

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Alves, 2018, Effect of Shoulder Position on Triceps Brachii Heads Activity in Dumbbell Elbow Extension Exercises, J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit., 58, 1247, 10.23736/S0022-4707.17.06849-9 · DOI
  2. Beato, 2021, Effects of Postactivation Potentiation after an Eccentric Overload Bout on Countermovement Jump and Lower-Limb Muscle Strength, J. Strength Cond. Res., 35, 1825, 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003005 · DOI
  3. Cools, 2015, Prevention of Shoulder Injuries in Overhead Athletes: A Science-Based Approach, Braz. J. Phys. Ther., 19, 331, 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0109 · DOI
  4. Coratella, 2015, Isoload vs Isokinetic Eccentric Exercise: a Direct Comparison of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Repeated Bout Effect, Sport Sci. Health, 11, 87, 10.1007/s11332-014-0213-x · DOI
  5. Coratella, 2016, Eccentric Resistance Training Increases and Retains Maximal Strength, Muscle Endurance, and Hypertrophy in Trained Men, Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab., 41, 1184, 10.1139/apnm-2016-0321 · DOI
  6. Coratella, 2015, Unilateral Eccentric Resistance Training: a Direct Comparison between Isokinetic and Dynamic Constant External Resistance Modalities, Eur. J. Sport Sci., 15, 720, 10.1080/17461391.2015.1060264 · DOI
  7. Coratella, 2016, Muscle Damage and Repeated Bout Effect Induced by Enhanced Eccentric Squats, J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit., 56, 1540
  8. Coratella, 2019, Effects of In-Season Enhanced Negative Work-Based vs Traditional Weight Training on Change of Direction and Hamstrings-To-Quadriceps Ratio in Soccer Players, Biol. Sport., 36, 241, 10.5114/biolsport.2019.87045 · DOI
  9. Coratella, The Effects of Verbal Instructions on Lower Limb Muscles ’ Excitation in Back-Squat, Res. Q. Exerc. Sport, 93, 429, 10.1080/02701367.2020.1840496 · DOI
  10. Coratella, An Electromyographic Analysis of Lateral Raise Variations and Frontal Raise in Competitive Bodybuilders, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 6015, 10.3390/ijerph17176015 · DOI
  11. Coratella, Specific Prime Movers’ Excitation during Free-Weight Bench Press Variations and Chest Press Machine in Competitive Bodybuilders, Eur. J. Sport Sci., 20, 571, 10.1080/17461391.2019.1655101 · DOI
  12. Coratella, 2021, He Activation of Gluteal , Thigh , and Lower Back Muscles in Different Squat Variations Performed by Competitive Bodybuilders : Implications for Resistance Training, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 772, 10.3390/ijerph18020772 · DOI
  13. Coratella, 2022, An Electromyographic Analysis of Romanian, step-Romanian, and Stiff-Leg Deadlift: Implication for Resistance Training, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 19, 1903, 10.3390/ijerph19031903 · DOI
  14. Dicus, 2018, Stability of Resistance Training Implement Alters EMG Activity during the Overhead Press, Int. J. Exerc. Sci., 11, 708
  15. Duchateau, 2016, Neural Control of Lengthening Contractions, J. Exp. Biol., 219, 197, 10.1242/jeb.123158 · DOI
  16. Escamilla, 2009, Shoulder Muscle Activity and Function in Common Shoulder Rehabilitation Exercises, Sports Med., 39, 663, 10.2165/00007256-200939080-00004 · DOI
  17. Heneghan, 2018, What Is the Effect of Prolonged Sitting and Physical Activity on Thoracic Spine Mobility? an Observational Study of Young Adults in a UK University Setting, BMJ Open, 8, e019371, 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019371 · DOI
  18. Hermens, 2000, Development of Recommendations for SEMG Sensors and Sensor Placement Procedures, J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol., 10, 361, 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Hopkins, 2009, Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science, Med. Sci. Sport. Exerc., 41, 3, 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818cb278 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Ichihashi, 2014, Kinematic Characteristics of the Scapula and Clavicle during Military Press Exercise and Shoulder Flexion, J. Shoulder Elb. Surg., 23, 649, 10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.014 · DOI
  21. Kohler, 2010, Muscle Activation Patterns while Lifting Stable and Unstable Loads on Stable and Unstable Surfaces, J. Strength Cond. Res., 24, 313, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181c8655a · DOI
  22. Kolber, 2013, Characteristics of Anterior Shoulder Instability and Hyperlaxity in the Weight-Training Population, J. Strength Cond. Res., 27, 1333, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318269f776 · DOI
  23. Kolber, 2014, Characteristichs of Shoulder Impingement in the Recreational Weight-Training Population, J. Strength Cond. Res., 28, 1081, 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000250 · DOI
  24. Lauver, 2016, Influence of Bench Angle on Upper Extremity Muscular Activation during Bench Press Exercise, Eur. J. Sport Sci., 16, 309, 10.1080/17461391.2015.1022605 · DOI
  25. Luczak, 2013, Shoulder Muscle Activation of Novice and Resistance Trained Women during Variations of Dumbbell Press Exercises, J. Sports Med., 2013, 1, 10.1155/2013/612650 · DOI
  26. Maeo, 2013, Trainability of Muscular Activity Level during Maximal Voluntary Co-Contraction: Comparison between Bodybuilders and Nonathletes, PLoS One, 8, e79486, 10.1371/journal.pone.0079486 · DOI
  27. McCaw, 1994, A Comparison of Muscle Activity between a Free Weight and Machine Bench Press, J. Strength Cond. Res., 8, 259, 10.1519/1533-4287(1994)008<0259:acomab>2.3.co;2 · DOI
  28. McKean, 2015, Overhead Shoulder Press - In-Front of the Head or behind the Head?, J. Sport Health Sci., 4, 250, 10.1016/j.jshs.2013.11.007 · DOI
  29. Merlo, 2010, Technical Aspects of Surface Electromyography for Clinicians, Torehj, 3, 98, 10.2174/1874943701003010098 · DOI
  30. Paoli, 2010, Influence of Different Ranges of Motion on Selective Recruitment of Shoulder Muscles in the Sitting Military Press: An Electromyographic Study, J. Strength Cond. Res., 24, 1578, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d756ea · DOI
  31. Pereira, 2019, Anabolic Steroids Among Resistance Training Practitioners, PLoS One, 14, e0223384, 10.1371/journal.pone.0223384 · DOI
  32. Saeterbakken, 2013, Effects of Body Position and Loading Modality on Muscle Activity and Strength in Shoulder Presses, J. Strength Cond. Res., 27, 1824, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318276b873 · DOI
  33. Saeterbakken, 2017, The Effects of Bench Press Variations in Competitive Athletes on Muscle Activity and Performance, J. Hum. Kinet., 57, 61, 10.1515/hukin-2017-0047 · DOI
  34. Schwanbeck, 2009, A Comparison of Free Weight Squat to Smith Machine Squat Using Electromyography, J. Strength Cond. Res., 23, 2588, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b1b181 · DOI
  35. Škarabot, 2020, The Knowns and Unknowns of Neural Adaptations to Resistance Training, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol., 121, 675, 10.1007/s00421-020-04567-3 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Uribe, 2010, Muscle Activation when Performing the Chest Press and Shoulder Press on a Stable Bench vs. A Swiss Ball, J. Strength Cond. Res., 24, 1028, 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181ca4fb8 · DOI
  37. Vigotsky, 2018, Interpreting Signal Amplitudes in Surface Electromyography Studies in Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, Front. Physiol., 8, 985, 10.3389/fphys.2017.00985 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Vigotsky, 2022, Longing for a Longitudinal Proxy : Acutely Measured Surface EMG Amplitude Is Not a Validated Predictor of Muscle Hypertrophy, Sports Med., 52, 193, 10.1007/s40279-021-01619-2 · DOI
  39. Williams, 2020, Activity of Shoulder Stabilizers and Prime Movers during an Unstable Overhead Press, J. Strength Cond. Res., 34, 73, 10.1519/jsc.0000000000002660 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coratella, G., Tornatore, G., Longo, S., Esposito, F., & Cè, E.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Coratella, Giuseppe
Venue
Frontiers in Physiology
Published
2022-07-22
Volume
13
Pages
825880-825880
ISSN
1664-042X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286697265
Cited by
14
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Keywords
overhead press, muscle activation, deltoid muscle, pectoralis major, triceps brachii, upper trapezius, resistance training, bodybuilders, electromyography, exercise variation, shoulder muscles, muscle fatigue, training volume, exercise frequency, exercise intensity, exercise progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review