The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 92 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seed Coating: A Tool for Delivering Beneficial Microbes to Agricultural Crops
Open accessAbstract
Plant beneficial microbes (PBM), such as plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB), rhizobia, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and Trichoderma can reduce the use of agrochemicals, increase plant yield, nutrition and tolerance to biotic-abiotic stresses. Yet, large-scale applications of PBM have been hampered by the high amounts of inoculum per plant or per cultivation area needed for successful colonization and consequently the economic feasibility. Seed coating, a process that consists in covering seeds with low amounts of exogenous materials is gaining attention as an efficient delivery system for PBM. Microbial seed coating comprises the use of a binder, in some cases a filler, mixed with inocula, and can be done using simple mixing-equipment (e.g. cement-mixer) or more specialized/sophisticated apparatus (e.g. fluidized bed). Binders/fillers can be used to extend microbial survival. The most reported types of seed coating are seed dressing, film coating and pelleting. Tested in more than 50 plant species with seeds of different dimensions, forms, textures and germination types (e.g. cereals, vegetables, fruits, pulses and other legumes), seed coating has been studied using various species of PGPB, rhizobia, Trichoderma and to a lesser extent AM fungi. Most of the studies regarding PBM applied via seed coating are aimed at promoting crop growth, yield and crop protection against pathogens. Studies have shown that coating seeds with PBM can assist crops in improving seedling establishment and germination or achieving high yields and food quality, under reduced chemical fertilization. The right combination of biological control agents (BCA) applied via seed coating can be a powerful tool against a wide number of diseases and pathogens. Less frequently, studies report seed coating being used for adaptation and protection of crops under abiotic stresses. Notwithstanding the promising results, there are still challenges mainly related with the scaling up from the laboratory to the field and proper formulation, including efficient microbial combinations and coating materials that can result in extended shelf-life of both seeds and coated PBM. These limitations need to be addressed and overcome in order to allow a wider use of seed coating as a cost-effective delivery method for PBM in sustainable agricultural systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(2022) · Permanent Missions to the United Nations · doi:10.18356/9789210018289c230 · Cited by 5,384
Trichoderma species — opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts
Harman, G. E., Howell, C. R., Viterbo, A., Chet, I., & Lorito, M. (2004) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro797 · Cited by 4,019
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Going back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere
Philippot, L., Raaijmakers, J. M., Lemanceau, P., & van der Putten, W. H. (2013) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3109 · Cited by 3,883
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers
Vessey, J. K. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026037216893 · Cited by 3,224
The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria
Glick, B. R. (1995) · Canadian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1139/m95-015 · Cited by 2,649
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Trichoderma Species: Our Best Fungal Allies in the Biocontrol of Plant Diseases—A Review
Guzmán-Guzmán, P., Kumar, A., de los Santos-Villalobos, S., Parra-Cota, F. I., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., Fadiji, A. E., Hyder, S., Babalola, O. O., & Santoyo, G. (2023) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants12030432 · Cited by 429
Enabling sustainable agriculture through understanding and enhancement of microbiomes
Trivedi, P., Mattupalli, C., Eversole, K., & Leach, J. E. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17319 · Cited by 348
Metaproteomics in the One Health framework for unraveling microbial effectors in microbiomes
Heyer, R., Wolf, M., Benndorf, D., Uzzau, S., Seifert, J., Grenga, L., Pabst, M., Schmitt, H., Mesuere, B., Van Den Bossche, T., et al. (2025) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-025-02119-5 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Rocha, I., Ma, Y., Souza-Alonso, P., Vosátka, M., Freitas, H., & Oliveira, R. S.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-11-06
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 1357-1357
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2982928930
- Cited by
- 455
- References
- 92
- FWCI
- 21.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seed Coating: A Tool for Delivering Beneficial Microbes to Agricultural Crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2019.01357
- The paper
- Rocha, I., Ma, Y., Souza-Alonso, P., Vosátka, M., Freitas, H., & Oliveira, R. S. (2019). Seed Coating: A Tool for Delivering Beneficial Microbes to Agricultural Crops. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.