Cited by 579Plant Stress Responses and ToleranceGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetics and Plant Breeding

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 254 of the 257 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impacts of salinity stress on crop plants: improving salt tolerance through genetic and molecular dissection

Open access

Abstract

Improper use of water resources in irrigation that contain a significant amount of salts, faulty agronomic practices such as improper fertilization, climate change etc. are gradually increasing soil salinity of arable lands across the globe. It is one of the major abiotic factors that inhibits overall plant growth through ionic imbalance, osmotic stress, oxidative stress, and reduced nutrient uptake. Plants have evolved with several adaptation strategies at morphological and molecular levels to withstand salinity stress. Among various approaches, harnessing the crop genetic variability across different genepools and developing salinity tolerant crop plants offer the most sustainable way of salt stress mitigation. Some important major genetic determinants controlling salinity tolerance have been uncovered using classical genetic approaches. However, its complex inheritance pattern makes breeding for salinity tolerance challenging. Subsequently, advances in sequence based breeding approaches and functional genomics have greatly assisted in underpinning novel genetic variants controlling salinity tolerance in plants at the whole genome level. This current review aims to shed light on physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses under salt stress, defense mechanisms of plants, underlying genetics of salt tolerance through bi-parental QTL mapping and Genome Wide Association Studies, and implication of Genomic Selection to breed salt tolerant lines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2023.1241736

Cites

254 of 254 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 (A) Year wise distribution of global total saline area. (B) Global distribution of salt affected area at topsoil and subsoil. Data source: Ivushkin et al. (2019); Hossain (2019), and FAO (2021).
Figure 1 (A) Year wise distribution of global total saline area. (B) Global distribution of salt affected area at topsoil and subsoil. Data source: Ivushkin et al. (2019); Hossain (2019), and FAO (2021).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Detrimental effects of salinity stress on various plant parts at different growth stages.
Figure 2 Detrimental effects of salinity stress on various plant parts at different growth stages.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Different physiological alterations in plants under salinity and role of antioxidants in stress alleviation.
Figure 3 Different physiological alterations in plants under salinity and role of antioxidants in stress alleviation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 A schematic illustration of genomic selection to improve salinity stress tolerance in crop plants.
Figure 4 A schematic illustration of genomic selection to improve salinity stress tolerance in crop plants.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 257 references

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Abd El-Monem, 2013, Mitigation salinity stress effects on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) growth, yield and some physiological aspects by hemin, J. Appl. Sci. Res., 9, 2411
  2. Ahmad, 2012, Salt induced changes in photosynthetic activity and oxidative defence system of three cultivars of mustard (Brassica juncea L.), Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11, 2694
  3. Chakraborty, 2013, Mechanism of salinity stress tolerance in crop plants and recent developments, 466
  4. Ehtaiwesh, 2020, Growth and yield responses of libyan hard wheat (Triticum durum Desf) genotypes to salinity stress, Zawia Univ. Bull., 22, 33
  5. 2015, Status of the wor’ld's soil resources (SWSR) – main report
  6. Nahar, 2009, Germination, growth, nodulation and yield performance of three mungbean varieties under different levels of salinity stress, Green Farming., 2, 825
  7. Neto, 2011, Chlorophyll fluorescence as a possible tool for salt-stress tolerance screening in the sunflower, Rev. Ciec. Agronômica., 42, 893
  8. Reddy, 1992, Photosynthetic studies and compartmentation of ions in different tissues of Salicornia brachiata Roxb. under saline conditions, Photosynthetica, 26, 173
  9. Squires, 2004, Salination, desertification, and soil erosion
  10. Szabolcs, 1989, Salt-affected soils
  11. Taiz, 2015, Plant physiology and development (No. Ed. 6)
  12. Vorasoot, 2003, Effect of water stress on yield and agronomic characters of peanut, Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technology., 25, 283
  13. Wahid, 2014, Assessing the effects of hydrogen fluoride on mango (Mangifera indica L.) in the vicinity of a brick kiln field in southern Pakistan, Fluoride., 47, 307
  14. Zheng, 2009, Exogenous nitric oxide improves seed germination in wheat against mitochondrial oxidative damage induced by high salinity, Environ. Exp. Bot., 67, 222227, 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.05.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 579

Metadata

Authors
Atta, K., Mondal, S., Gorai, S., Singh, A. P., Kumari, A., Ghosh, T., Roy, A., Hembram, S., Gaikwad, D. J., Mondal, S., Bhattacharya, S., Jha, U. C., & Jespersen, D.
Affiliations
  • Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya (IN)
  • Indian Council of Agricultural Research (IN)
  • Government of West Bengal (IN)
  • Centurion University of Technology and Management (IN)
  • Indian Institute of Pulses Research (IN)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
  • Gorai, Shouvik
  • Jespersen, David
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2023-09-15
Volume
14
Pages
1241736-1241736
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386836861
Cited by
523
References
257
Citations by year
2026: 232 · 2025: 212 · 2024: 79
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
salt stress, salt tolerance, cultivated plants, soil salinity, osmotic stress, oxidative stress, ionic imbalance, nutrient uptake, plant adaptation strategies, QTL mapping, genome-wide association study, genomic selection, salt tolerance breeding, functional genomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review