Cited by 47Smart Agriculture and AIAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsIndustrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Precision agriculture with YOLO-Leaf: advanced methods for detecting apple leaf diseases

Open access
Li, Tong, Zhang, Liyuan, Lin, Jianchu·2024·Frontiers in Plant Science

Abstract

The detection of apple leaf diseases plays a crucial role in ensuring crop health and yield. However, due to variations in lighting and shadow, as well as the complex relationships between perceptual fields and target scales, current detection methods face significant challenges. To address these issues, we propose a new model called YOLO-Leaf. Specifically, YOLO-Leaf utilizes Dynamic Snake Convolution (DSConv) for robust feature extraction, employs BiFormer to enhance the attention mechanism, and introduces IF-CIoU to improve bounding box regression for increased detection accuracy and generalization ability. Experimental results on the FGVC7 and FGVC8 datasets show that YOLO-Leaf significantly outperforms existing models in terms of detection accuracy, achieving mAP50 scores of 93.88% and 95.69%, respectively. This advancement not only validates the effectiveness of our approach but also highlights its practical application potential in agricultural disease detection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpls.2024.1452502

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Overall network architecture diagram of YOLO-Leaf.
Figure 1 Overall network architecture diagram of YOLO-Leaf.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 YOLOv8 network architecture diagram (Jocher et al., 2023).
Figure 2 YOLOv8 network architecture diagram (Jocher et al., 2023).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Dynamic snake convolution network architecture diagram (Qi et al., 2023).
Figure 3 Dynamic snake convolution network architecture diagram (Qi et al., 2023).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 BiFormer network architecture (Zhu et al., 2023).
Figure 4 BiFormer network architecture (Zhu et al., 2023).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Sample display. (A) Healthy. (B) Scab.(C) Rust. (D) multiple diseases.
Figure 5 Sample display. (A) Healthy. (B) Scab.(C) Rust. (D) multiple diseases.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Sample display. (A) Mosaic disease. (B) Powdery mildew. (C) Rust. (D) Frog eye leaf spot. (E) Scab.
Figure 6 Sample display. (A) Mosaic disease. (B) Powdery mildew. (C) Rust. (D) Frog eye leaf spot. (E) Scab.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 RGB Distribution of the Datasets. (A) Plant Pathology 2020-FGVC. (B) Plant Pathology 2021-FGVC.
Figure 7 RGB Distribution of the Datasets. (A) Plant Pathology 2020-FGVC. (B) Plant Pathology 2021-FGVC.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Effect of non-local means denoising on apple leaf images. (A) Original noisy image. (B) Denoised image.
Figure 8 Effect of non-local means denoising on apple leaf images. (A) Original noisy image. (B) Denoised image.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 The results of the proposed model.
Figure 9 The results of the proposed model.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 10 Different model parameter comparisons.
Figure 10 Different model parameter comparisons.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 11 YOLO-Leaf detection results. (A) leaf Powdery, (B) leaf rust, (C) leaf scab.
Figure 11 YOLO-Leaf detection results. (A) leaf Powdery, (B) leaf rust, (C) leaf scab.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 12 Performance of the YOLO-Leaf model on powdery mildew.
Figure 12 Performance of the YOLO-Leaf model on powdery mildew.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Ait Nasser, 2024, A hybrid deep learning architecture for apple foliar disease detection, Computers, 13, 116, 10.3390/computers13050116 · DOI
  2. Bonkra, 2021, Apple leaf diseases detection system: a review of the different segmentation and deep learning methods, 263
  3. Chen, 2023, Apple leaf disease identification via improved cyclegan and convolutional neural network, Soft Computing, 27, 9773, 10.1007/s00500-023-07811-y · DOI
  4. Eunice, 2022, Deep learning-based leaf disease detection in crops using images for agricultural applications, Agronomy, 12, 2395, 10.3390/agronomy12102395 · DOI
  5. Fan, 2022, Leaf image based plant disease identification using transfer learning and feature fusion, Comput. Electron. Agric., 196, 106892, 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106892 · DOI
  6. Gao, 2020, Multi-class fruit-on-plant detection for apple in snap system using faster r-cnn, Comput. Electron. Agric., 176, 105634, 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105634 · DOI
  7. Gao, 2023, Apple leaf disease identification in complex background based on bam-net, Agronomy, 13, 1240, 10.3390/agronomy13051240 · DOI
  8. Gong, 2023, A high-precision detection method of apple leaf diseases using improved faster r-cnn, Agriculture, 13, 240, 10.3390/agriculture13020240 · DOI
  9. Hameed Al-bayati, 2020, Evolutionary feature optimization for plant leaf disease detection by deep neural networks, Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst., 13, 12, 10.2991/ijcis.d.200108.001 · DOI
  10. Krishnarji, 2024, Detection of apple plant diseases using leaf images through convolutional neural network, Int. J. Innovative Eng. Manage. Res., 13, 10.2139/ssrn.4789758 · DOI
  11. Li, 2024, Learning adversarial semantic embeddings for zero-shot recognition in open worlds, Pattern Recognition, 149, 110258, 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110258 · DOI
  12. Li, 2022, Symptom recognition of disease and insect damage based on mask r-cnn, wavelet transform, and f-rnet, Front. Plant Sci., 13, 10.3389/fpls.2022.922797 · DOI
  13. Li, 2021, Plant disease detection and classification by deep learning—a review, IEEE Access, 9, 56683, 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3069646 · DOI
  14. Ma, 2023, Detection and counting of small target apples under complicated environments by using improved yolov7-tiny, Agronomy, 13, 1419, 10.3390/agronomy13051419 · DOI
  15. Omrani, 2014, Potential of radial basis function-based support vector regression for apple disease detection, Measurement, 55, 512, 10.1016/j.measurement.2014.05.033 · DOI
  16. Pal, 2023, Agridet: Plant leaf disease severity classification using agriculture detection framework, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 119, 105754, 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105754 · DOI
  17. Ren, 2024, Strategic priorities, tasks, and pathways for advancing new productivity in the chinese-style modernization, J. Xi’an Univ. Finance Economics, 37, 3, 10.19331/j.cnki.jxufe.20240008.002 · DOI
  18. Sun, 2021, Mean-ssd: A novel real-time detector for apple leaf diseases using improved light-weight convolutional neural networks, Comput. Electron. Agric., 189, 106379, 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106379 · DOI
  19. Thapa, 2020, The plant pathology 2020 challenge dataset to classify foliar disease of apples, Appl. Plant Sci, 8, e11390, 10.1002/aps3.11390 · DOI
  20. Tian, 2021, Diagnosis of typical apple diseases: a deep learning method based on multi-scale dense classification network, Front. Plant Sci., 12, 10.3389/fpls.2021.698474 · DOI
  21. Tian, 2019, Apple detection during different growth stages in orchards using the improved yolo-v3 model, Comput. Electron. Agric., 157, 417, 10.1016/j.compag.2019.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Wang, 2024, Towards robust lidar-camera fusion in bev space via mutual deformable attention and temporal aggregation, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol., 1, 10.1109/TCSVT.2024.3366664 · DOI
  23. Wang, 2022, Mga-yolo: A lightweight one-stage network for apple leaf disease detection, Front. Plant Sci., 13, 10.3389/fpls.2022.927424 · DOI
  24. Wani, 2022, Machine learning and deep learning based computational techniques in automatic agricultural diseases detection: Methodologies, applications, and challenges, Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., 29, 641, 10.1007/s11831-021-09588-5 · DOI
  25. Xing, 2023, The evaluation of the grade of leaf disease in apple trees based on pca-logistic regression analysis, Forests, 14, 1290, 10.3390/f14071290 · DOI
  26. Xinming, 2023, Comparative study on leaf disease identification using yolo v4 and yolo v7 algorithm, AgBioForum, 25
  27. Yao, 2024, The new development concept helps accelerate the formation of new quality productivity: Theoretical logic and implementation paths, J. Xi’an Univ. Finance Economics, 37, 3
  28. Yu, 2022, Apple leaf disease recognition method with improved residual network, Multimedia Tools Appl., 81, 7759, 10.1007/s11042-022-11915-2 · DOI
  29. Zhang, 2023, Research of segmentation recognition of small disease spots on apple leaves based on hybrid loss function and cbam, Front. Plant Sci., 14, 10.3389/fpls.2023.1175027 · DOI
  30. Zhang, 2023, Inner-iou: more effective intersection over union loss with auxiliary bounding box, arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.02877, 10.48550/arXiv.2311.02877 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Zhang, 2024, Towards effective person search with deep learning: A survey from systematic perspective, Pattern Recognition, 110434, 10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110434 · DOI
  32. Zhang, 2022, Deep multi-scale dual-channel convolutional neural network for internet of things apple disease detection, Comput. Electron. Agric., 194, 106749, 10.1016/j.compag.2022.106749 · DOI
  33. Zhong, 2020, Research on deep learning in apple leaf disease recognition, Comput. Electron. Agric., 168, 105146, 10.1016/j.compag.2019.105146 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Li, T., Zhang, L., & Lin, J.
Affiliations
  • Lanzhou University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Liyuan
Venue
Frontiers in Plant Science
Published
2024-10-15
Volume
15
Pages
1452502-1452502
ISSN
1664-462X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403440761
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 3
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Plant Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62341118)
  • Government of Jiangsu Province
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Keywords
apple leaf disease detection, object detection, dynamic snake convolution, BiFormer, attention mechanism, bounding box regression, precision agriculture, plant disease diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review