The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpersonal Synergies
Open accessAbstract
We present the perspective that interpersonal movement coordination results from establishing interpersonal synergies. Interpersonal synergies are higher-order control systems formed by coupling movement system degrees of freedom of two (or more) actors. Characteristic features of synergies identified in studies of intrapersonal coordination - dimensional compression and reciprocal compensation - are revealed in studies of interpersonal coordination that applied the uncontrolled manifold approach and principal component analysis to interpersonal movement tasks. Broader implications of the interpersonal synergy approach for movement science include an expanded notion of mechanism and an emphasis on interaction-dominant dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
It's All in the Timing: Interpersonal Synchrony Increases Affiliation
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949 · Cited by 1,334 · cited 3×
“Interpersonal synergies may help build rapport (Bernieri et al., 1996; Chartrand and Bargh, 1999; Hove and Risen, 2009; Marsh et al., 2009).”
Self-organization of cognitive performance.
Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331 · Cited by 718
Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation.
Shockley, K., Santana, M.-V., & Fowler, C. A. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.326 · Cited by 681
Self-citationDynamics of Interpersonal Coordination
Schmidt, R. C., & Richardson, M. J. (2007) · Understanding Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74479-5_14 · Cited by 415
Self-citationCohn, J. F., & Tronick, E. Z. (1988) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.386 · Cited by 364
The objective basis of behavior units
Newtson, D., Engquist, G. A., & Bois, J. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.12.847 · Cited by 324
Cited by
Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of recent research (2006–2012).
Repp, B. H., & Su, Y.-H. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0371-2 · Cited by 1,204
Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world
Hasson, U., Ghazanfar, A. A., Galantucci, B., Garrod, S., & Keysers, C. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.007 · Cited by 1,140
Eroding the Boundaries of Cognition: Implications of Embodiment1
Anderson, M. L., Richardson, M. J., & Chemero, A. (2012) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01211.x · Cited by 200
Self-citationKoban, L., Ramamoorthy, A., & Konvalinka, I. (2019) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2017.1400463 · Cited by 180
Golland, Y., Arzouan, Y., & Levit-Binnun, N. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125804 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 38-38
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4235739886
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpersonal Synergies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038
- The paper
- Riley, M. A., Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., & Ramenzoni, V. C. (2011). Interpersonal Synergies. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00038
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
