Cited by 60Language, Metaphor, and CognitionEmbodied and Extended CognitionAction Observation and Synchronization

Metaphors are Embodied, and so are Their Literal Counterparts

Open access
Santana, Eduardo, de Vega, Manuel·2011·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

This study investigates whether understanding up/down metaphors as well as semantically homologous literal sentences activates embodied representations online. Participants read orientational literal sentences (e.g., she climbed up the hill), metaphors (e.g., she climbed up in the company), and abstract sentences with similar meaning to the metaphors (e.g., she succeeded in the company). In Experiments 1 and 2, participants were asked to perform a speeded upward or downward hand motion while they were reading the sentence verb. The hand motion either matched or mismatched the direction connoted by the sentence. The results showed a meaning-action effect for metaphors and literals, that is, faster hand motion responses in the matching conditions. Notably, the matching advantage was also found for homologous abstract sentences, indicating that some abstract ideas are conceptually organized in the vertical dimension, even when they are expressed by means of literal sentences. In Experiment 3, participants responded to an upward or downward visual motion associated with the sentence verb by pressing a single key. In this case, the facilitation effect for matching visual motion-sentence meaning faded, indicating that the visual motion component is less important than the action component in conceptual metaphors. Most up and down metaphors convey emotionally positive and negative information, respectively. We suggest that metaphorical meaning elicits upward/downward movements because they are grounded on the bodily expression of the corresponding emotions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00090

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even 'offline' and seemingly abstract cognitive processes, such as number representation and metaphor, appear to be 'body based'.

    “Even ‘offline’ and seemingly abstract cognitive processes, such as number representation and metaphor, appear to be ‘body based’ [31,129], and many allegedly abstract, centralized cognitive processes recruit distributed sensory–motor systems that evolved to control bodily movement [31].”

    From Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum (2012) · cites this paper as [129]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Buccino G. Riggio L. Melli G. Binkofski F. Gallese V. Rizzolatti G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioural study. Cogn. Brain Res. 24, 355– 363 16099349
  2. Torralbo A. Santiago J. Lupiáñez J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cogn. Sci. 30, 745– 757 21702834
  3. Wilson N. Gibbs R. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cogn. Sci. 31, 721– 731 21635315

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Santana, E., & de Vega, M.
Affiliations
Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
2
Pages
90-90
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150482569
Cited by
60
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
  • Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
conceptual metaphor, embodied cognition, vertical dimension, emotional valence, visual motion, hand movement, metaphor comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review