The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update
Open accessAbstract
In the first decade of neurocognitive word production research the predominant approach was brain mapping, i.e., investigating the regional cerebral brain activation patterns correlated with word production tasks, such as picture naming and word generation. Indefrey and Levelt (2004) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of word production studies that used this approach and combined the resulting spatial information on neural correlates of component processes of word production with information on the time course of word production provided by behavioral and electromagnetic studies. In recent years, neurocognitive word production research has seen a major change toward a hypothesis-testing approach. This approach is characterized by the design of experimental variables modulating single component processes of word production and testing for predicted effects on spatial or temporal neurocognitive signatures of these components. This change was accompanied by the development of a broader spectrum of measurement and analysis techniques. The article reviews the findings of recent studies using the new approach. The time course assumptions of Indefrey and Levelt (2004) have largely been confirmed requiring only minor adaptations. Adaptations of the brain structure/function relationships proposed by Indefrey and Levelt (2004) include the precise role of subregions of the left inferior frontal gyrus as well as a probable, yet to date unclear role of the inferior parietal cortex in word production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“in lab experiments participants typically need 600 ms to 800 ms to name a line drawing of a common object”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Indefrey, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is remarkable because utterance planning is not instantaneous but requires substantial amounts of time.”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Indefrey, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495 · cited 3×
“Secondly, the influential dualstream model of speech processing (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000, 2004, 2007) assumes an area at the boundary between temporal and parietal lobes (area Spt) to function as a sensorimotor interface in language production.”
BackgroundMethodA theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295 · cited 5×
“Levelt et al. (1999) assume this selection process to take place in a part of the mental lexicon (lemma level) that is linked to the conceptual level and contains information about the grammatical properties of words, such as word class or grammatical gender.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 · Cited by 4,500
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060 · cited 4×
“…prefrontal cortex, IFG, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and posterior cingulate gyrus) identified in a recent comprehensive meta-analysis by Binder et al., 2009, see also Schwartz et al., 2009, for an excellent discussion of the clinical evidence on regions involved in conceptual…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSpeaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. N. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,036
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 3×
“With respect to the insula, this pattern of reports is better compatible with a role in articulatory planning as suggested by Dronkers (1996) than a role in articulatory execution.”
BackgroundHickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 · Cited by 2,212 · cited 4×
“, 1996; Hirano et al., 1997). An involvement of the bilateral STG in the internal loop of self-monitoring is suggested by data from Shergill et al. (2002) who manipulated the rate of inner speech. More recently, Tourville et al. (2008) used feedback with a shifted first formant frequency and applied SEM to the resulti…”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 126 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 766
Neural encoding and production of functional morphemes in the posterior temporal lobe
Lee, D. K., Fedorenko, E. G., Simon, M. V., Curry, W. T., Nahed, B. V., Cahill, D. P., & Williams, Z. M. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04235-3 · Cited by 26
Magyari, L. (2021) · Language, cognition and mind · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66175-5_5 · Cited by 27
Control adjustments in speaking: Electrophysiology of the Gratton effect in picture naming
Shitova, N., Roelofs, A., Schriefers, H. J., BASTIAANSEN, M. C. M., & Schoffelen, J. (2017) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.017 · Cited by 25
Grey Matter Correlates of Three Language Tests in Non-demented Older Adults
Zhang, H., Sachdev, P. S., Wen, W. X., Kochan, N. A., Crawford, J. D., Brodaty, H., Slavin, M. J., Reppermund, S., Kang, K., & Trollor, J. N. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080215 · Cited by 27
Phonological facilitation in picture naming: When and where? A tDCS study
Pisoni, A., Cerciello, M., Cattaneo, Z., & Papagno, C. (2017) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.03.043 · Cited by 25
Laganaro, M. (2017) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-017-0580-0 · Cited by 26
Word onset phonetic properties and motor artifacts in speech production EEG recordings
Fargier, R., Bürki, A., Pinet, S., Alario, F. ‐., & Laganaro, M. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12982 · Cited by 27
The contribution of different frequency bands in class separability of covert speech tasks for BCIs
Jahangiri, A., & Sepulveda, F. (2017) · doi:10.1109/embc.2017.8037266 · Cited by 25
Lesion analysis of language production deficits in aphasia
Faroqi‐Shah, Y., Kling, T., Solomon, J. M., Liu, S., Park, G., & Braun, A. R. (2013) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.853023 · Cited by 28
den Hollander, J. (2021) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.151478630 · Cited by 24
Wang, J., Wong, A. W.-K., Wang, S., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06186-z · Cited by 24
Ferré, P., Jarret, J., Brambati, S. M., Bellec, P., & Joanette, Y. (2020) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00007 · Cited by 25
Huang, M., Lang, J., Li, J., Qin, Z., & Cao, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2023.1189841 · Cited by 28
Perseverations in Alzheimer's disease: memory slips?
Miozzo, M., Fischer-Baum, S., & Vliet, E. C.-V. (2013) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.10.016 · Cited by 26
From Mind to Mouth: Event Related Potentials of Sentence Production in Classic Galactosemia
Timmers, I., Jansma, B. M., & Rubio‐Gozalbo, M. E. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052826 · Cited by 24
Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in speech monitoring
Riès, S., Xie, K., Haaland, K. Y., Dronkers, N. F., & Knight, R. T. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00703 · Cited by 25
Sollmann, N., Negwer, C., Tussis, L., Hauck, T., Ille, S., Maurer, S., Giglhuber, K., Bauer, J. S., Ringel, F. A., Meyer, B., et al. (2016) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2016.1.jns152053 · Cited by 24
Radman, N., Britz, J., Buetler, K. A., Weekes, B., Spierer, L., & Annoni, J. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00490 · Cited by 24
Powell, A., Sumnall, H. R., Smith, J. B., Kuiper, R., & Montgomery, C. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296043 · Cited by 27
Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2016) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-016-0504-4 · Cited by 23
Cohen, M., Mahé, G., Laganaro, M., & Zesiger, P. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00073 · Cited by 30
Jung, S., Lee, A., Bang, M., & Lee, S. (2019) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102022 · Cited by 23
Bourguignon, M., Molinaro, N., Lizarazu, M., Taulu, S., Jousmäki, V., Lallier, M., Carreiras, M., & Tiège, X. D. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116788 · Cited by 25
Reading aloud in Persian: ERP evidence for an early locus of the masked onset priming effect
Timmer, K., Vahid-Gharavi, N., & Schiller, N. O. (2012) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.04.013 · Cited by 23
Lexical Planning in Sentence Production Is Highly Incremental: Evidence from ERPs
Zhao, L.-M., & Yang, Y.-F. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146359 · Cited by 20
Aging Modulates the Hemispheric Specialization during Word Production
Hoyau, E., Boudiaf, N., Cousin, É., Pichat, C., Fournet, N., Krainik, A., Jaillard, A. S., & Baciu, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00125 · Cited by 29
The Structure of Word Learning in Young School-Age Children
Gray, S. I., Lancaster, H. S., Alt, M., Hogan, T. P., Green, S., Levy, R., & Cowan, N. (2020) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2020_jslhr-19-00186 · Cited by 28
Lakretz, Y., Ossmy, O., Friedmann, N., Mukamel, R., & Fried, I. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117499 · Cited by 26
Gastaldon, S., Busan, P., Arcara, G., & Peressotti, F. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad004 · Cited by 23
The use of conceptual components in language production: an ERP study
Redmann, A., FitzPatrick, I., Hellwig, F. M., et al. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00363 · Cited by 22
Self-citation“When” Does Picture Naming Take Longer Than Word Reading?
Valente, A., Pinet, S., Alario, F. ‐., & Laganaro, M. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00031 · Cited by 23
Lorenz, A., & Zwitserlood, P. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01943 · Cited by 22
Covert Speech vs. Motor Imagery: a comparative study of class separability in identical environments
Jahangiri, A., Chau, J. M., Achanccaray, D., & Sepulveda, F. (2018) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2018.8512724 · Cited by 22
Functional Parcellation of the Speech Production Cortex
Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castañón, A., Heyne, M., & Guenther, F. H. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0442 · Cited by 22
Qu, Q., Feng, C., Hou, F., et al. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107559 · Cited by 22
Angrick, M., Luo, S., Rabbani, Q., Candrea, D. N., Shah, S., Milsap, G. W., Anderson, W. S., Gordon, C. R., Rosenblatt, K. R., Clawson, L., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.06.30.23291352 · Cited by 95
“…phoneme decoding over fixed window sizes of 400 ms (Mugler, 2014) and 500 ms (Ramsey, 2018; Jiang, 2016) around speech onset times, suggesting that the nVAD model benefited from neural activity during speech planning and phonological processing (Indefrey, 2011) when identifying speech onset.”
InfluentialLanguage Production and Prediction in a Parallel Activation Model
Pickering, M. J., & Strijkers, K. (2024) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12775 · Cited by 31
Faroqi‐Shah, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Language Sciences · doi:10.3389/flang.2023.1118739 · Cited by 24
High-level language brain regions process sublexical regularities
Regev, T. I., Kim, H. S., Chen, X. J., Affourtit, J., Schipper, A. E., Bergen, L., Mahowald, K., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2024) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhae077 · Cited by 26
Sollmann, N., Ille, S., Negwer, C., Boeckh‐Behrens, T., Ringel, F. A., Meyer, B., & Krieg, S. M. (2016) · Brain Imaging and Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11682-016-9574-x · Cited by 21
Objective support for subjective reports of successful inner speech in two people with aphasia
Hayward, W., Snider, S. F., Luta, G., Friedman, R. B., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2016) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2016.1192998 · Cited by 22
Klaus, J., Schutter, D. J. L. G., & Piai, V. (2019) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24860 · Cited by 25
Preserved meaning in the context of impaired naming in temporal lobe epilepsy.
Miozzo, M., & Hamberger, M. J. (2014) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000097 · Cited by 20
Roelofs, A. (2022) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105094 · Cited by 20
Aberrant neurophysiological signaling associated with speech impairments in Parkinson’s disease
Wiesman, A. I., Donhauser, P. W., Degroot, C., Diab, S., Kousaie, S., Fon, E. A., Klein, D., Baillet, S., Villeneuve, S., & Quebec Parkinson Network (2023) · npj Parkinson s Disease · doi:10.1038/s41531-023-00495-z · Cited by 20
The neurobiology of taboo language processing: fMRI evidence during spoken word production
Hansen, S. J., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz009 · Cited by 20
Krott, A., Medaglia, M. T., & Porcaro, C. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00696 · Cited by 22
Pestalozzi, M. I., Annoni, J., Müri, R. M., & Jost, L. B. (2020) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2020.104775 · Cited by 20
Amoruso, L., Geng, S., Molinaro, N., Timofeeva, P., Gisbert‐Muñoz, S., Robles, S. G., Pomposo, I., Quiñones, I., & Carreiras, M. (2020) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.25328 · Cited by 20
Meyer, A. M., Faria, A. V., Tippett, D. C., Hillis, A. E., & Friedman, R. B. (2017) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2017.1296557 · Cited by 20
Wang, J., Wong, A. W.-K., & Chen, H.-C. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1325-5 · Cited by 20
Roelofs, A., & Shitova, N. (2016) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2016.1274415 · Cited by 20
The time course of cross-modal representations of conceptual categories
Dirani, J., & Liina Pylkkänen, A. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120254 · Cited by 19
Associative facilitation in the Stroop task: Comment on Mahon et al. (2012)
Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.03.001 · Cited by 19
Kireev, M. V., Slioussar, N., Korotkov, A. D., Chernigovskaya, T. V., & Medvedev, S. V. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00036 · Cited by 19
Wong, A. W.-K., Chiu, H.-C., Wang, J., et al. (2017) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2017.1355060 · Cited by 19
Diaz, M. T., Johnson, M. A., Burke, D. M., Truong, T., & Madden, D. J. (2018) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-018-00671-2 · Cited by 20
Syllables are Retrieved before Segments in the Spoken Production of Mandarin Chinese: An ERP Study
Feng, C., Yue, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48033-3 · Cited by 19
Rezaie, R., Schiller, K., Embury, L. M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1097/wnp.0000000000000499 · Cited by 19
Stille, C. M., Bekolay, T., Blouw, P., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01594 · Cited by 19
How attention controls naming: Lessons from Wundt 2.0.
Roelofs, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001030 · Cited by 18
Ageing effects on word production processes: an ERP topographic analysis
Valente, A., & Laganaro, M. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1059950 · Cited by 19
Bürki, A. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12885 · Cited by 18
Barthel, M., & Levinson, S. C. (2020) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2020.1716030 · Cited by 20
Indirect White Matter Pathways Are Associated With Treated Naming Improvement in Aphasia
Wilmskoetter, J., Fridriksson, J., Basilakos, A., Johnson, L. P., Marebwa, B., Rorden, C., Warner, G., Hickok, G. S., Hillis, A. E., & Bonilha, L. (2021) · Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · doi:10.1177/1545968321999052 · Cited by 18
Wolna, A., Szewczyk, J., Diaz, M. T., Domagalik, A., Marcin Szwed, A., & Wodniecka, Z. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-49375-9 · Cited by 19
Hilviu, D., Parola, A., Bosco, F. M., Marini, A., & Gabbatore, I. (2024) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2024.2401027 · Cited by 19
Response retrieval and motor planning during typing
Pinet, S., Dubarry, A., & Alario, F. ‐. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.012 · Cited by 18
Affected functional networks associated with sentence production in classic galactosemia
Timmers, I., van den Hurk, J., Hofman, P. A. M., Zimmermann, L. J. I., Uludaǧ, K., Jansma, B. M., & Rubio‐Gozalbo, M. E. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.007 · Cited by 18
Araújo, S., Huettig, F., & Meyer, A. S. (2020) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2020.1867863 · Cited by 24
Radman, N., Spierer, L., Laganaro, M., Annoni, J., & Colombo, F. (2015) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2015.1047383 · Cited by 18
On the production of interlingual homophones: delayed naming and increased N400
Christoffels, I. K., Timmer, K., Ganushchak, L. Y., & Heij, W. L. (2015) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2015.1120877 · Cited by 18
Hinojosa, J. A., Fernández‐Folgueiras, U., Albert, J., Santaniello, G., Pozo, M. A., & Capilla, A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.12.025 · Cited by 21
Interference from related actions in spoken word production: Behavioural and fMRI evidence
de Zubicaray, G. I., Fraser, D., Ramajoo, K., & McMahon, K. L. (2017) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.010 · Cited by 20
Hoyau, E., Roux-Sibilon, A., Boudiaf, N., Pichat, C., Cousin, É., Krainik, A., Jaillard, A. S., Peyrin, C., & Baciu, M. V. (2018) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.003 · Cited by 19
Baciu, M., & Roger, É. (2024) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12736 · Cited by 20
Anders, R., Llorens, A., Dubarry, A., Trébuchon, A., Liégeois‐Chauvel, C., & Alario, F. ‐. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01406 · Cited by 15
Smirni, D., Oliveri, M., Misuraca, E., Catania, A., Vernuccio, L., Picciolo, V., Inzerillo, F., Barbagallo, M., Cipolotti, L., & Turriziani, P. (2021) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-210003 · Cited by 19
Noun-phrase production as a window to language selection: An ERP study
Wolfsthurn, S. V. G. Z., Pablos, L., & Schiller, N. O. (2021) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108055 · Cited by 17
Cognitive components of aging-related increase in word-finding difficulty
Wei, H. T., Kulzhabayeva, D., Erceg, L., Robin, J., Hu, Y. Z., Chignell, M., & Meltzer, J. A. (2024) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2024.2315774 · Cited by 18
Neural dynamics of object noun, action verb and action noun production in picture naming
Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.09.004 · Cited by 18
On the nature of sonority in spoken word production: Evidence from neuropsychology
Miozzo, M., & Buchwald, A. B. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.006 · Cited by 17
An intracerebral exploration of functional connectivity during word production
Grappe, A., Sarma, S. V., Sacré, P., Gonzalez-Martinez, J. A., Liégeois‐Chauvel, C., & Alario, F. ‐. (2018) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-018-0699-3 · Cited by 17
A Novel EEG-Based Four-Class Linguistic BCI
Jahangiri, A., Achanccaray, D., & Sepulveda, F. (2019) · doi:10.1109/embc.2019.8856644 · Cited by 17
Cai, X., Yin, Y., & Zhang, Q. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107382 · Cited by 17
Gauvin, H. S., Mcmahon, K., & de Zubicaray, G. (2020) · Language, Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2020.1762904 · Cited by 31
Ohlerth, A.-K., Bastiaanse, R., Negwer, C., Sollmann, N., Schramm, S., Schröder, A., & Krieg, S. (2021) · Brain Science · doi:10.3390/brainsci11091190 · Cited by 14
Aspects of competition in word production: Reply to Mahon and Navarrete
Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2014) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2014.10.016 · Cited by 17
Object and proper name retrieval in temporal lobe epilepsy: a study of difficulties and latencies.
Condret-Santi, V., Barragan-Jason, G., Valton, L., Denuelle, M., Curot, J., Nespoulous, J., & Barbeau, E. (2014) · Epilepsy Research · doi:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.09.001 · Cited by 15
Functional and time-course changes in single word production from childhood to adulthood
Laganaro, M., Tzieropoulos, H., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Zesiger, P. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.027 · Cited by 17
Interference in speaking while hearing and vice versa
Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-41752-7 · Cited by 15
Neurolinguistic Approaches in Morphology
Schiller, N. O. (2020) · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.601 · Cited by 17
Johnson, J. P., Meier, E., Pan, Y., & Kiran, S. (2021) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2021.105042 · Cited by 11
Zhang, W., Jiang, M., Teo, C., Bhuvanakantham, R., Zoey, F. L., Sim, W. K. J., Guo, Z., Foo, C. H. V., Chua, R. H. J., Padmanabhan, P., et al. (2024) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2024.120629 · Cited by 16
A Phone in a Basket Looks Like a Knife in a Cup: Role-Filler Independence in Visual Processing
Hafri, A., Bonner, M., Landau, B., & Firestone, C. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00146 · Cited by 16
Sollmann, N., Tanigawa, N., Tussis, L., Hauck, T., Ille, S., Maurer, S., Negwer, C., Zimmer, C., Ringel, F. A., Meyer, B., et al. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.035 · Cited by 16
Shitova, N., Roelofs, A., Schriefers, H. J., et al. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161052 · Cited by 16
Bose, A., & Schafer, G. (2016) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1254148 · Cited by 16
Qu, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1659988 · Cited by 16
Whole-brain dynamics of articulatory, acoustic and semantic speech representations
Verwoert, M., Amigó-Vega, J., Gao, Y., Ottenhoff, M. C., Kubben, P., & Herff, C. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07862-x · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Indefrey, P.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Indefrey, Peter
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 255-255
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3191502
- OpenAlex
- W2056949810
- Semantic Scholar
- 1d28a8977f5bd27b32e22401d7ebb700d3eb494b
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- word production, neural correlates, picture naming, left inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal cortex, brain structure-function relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
