The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 126 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet.
The Spatial and Temporal Signatures of Word Production Components: A Critical Update
Open accessAbstract
In the first decade of neurocognitive word production research the predominant approach was brain mapping, i.e., investigating the regional cerebral brain activation patterns correlated with word production tasks, such as picture naming and word generation. Indefrey and Levelt (2004) conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of word production studies that used this approach and combined the resulting spatial information on neural correlates of component processes of word production with information on the time course of word production provided by behavioral and electromagnetic studies. In recent years, neurocognitive word production research has seen a major change toward a hypothesis-testing approach. This approach is characterized by the design of experimental variables modulating single component processes of word production and testing for predicted effects on spatial or temporal neurocognitive signatures of these components. This change was accompanied by the development of a broader spectrum of measurement and analysis techniques. The article reviews the findings of recent studies using the new approach. The time course assumptions of Indefrey and Levelt (2004) have largely been confirmed requiring only minor adaptations. Adaptations of the brain structure/function relationships proposed by Indefrey and Levelt (2004) include the precise role of subregions of the left inferior frontal gyrus as well as a probable, yet to date unclear role of the inferior parietal cortex in word production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“in lab experiments participants typically need 600 ms to 800 ms to name a line drawing of a common object”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Indefrey, 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This is remarkable because utterance planning is not instantaneous but requires substantial amounts of time.”
From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Indefrey, 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain
Laitinen, L. (1989) · Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery · doi:10.1016/0303-8467(89)90128-5 · Cited by 7,565
The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2113 · Cited by 5,495 · cited 3×
“Secondly, the influential dualstream model of speech processing (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000, 2004, 2007) assumes an area at the boundary between temporal and parietal lobes (area Spt) to function as a sensorimotor interface in language production.”
BackgroundMethodA theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295 · cited 5×
“Levelt et al. (1999) assume this selection process to take place in a part of the mental lexicon (lemma level) that is linked to the conceptual level and contains information about the grammatical properties of words, such as word class or grammatical gender.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.
Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.1.204 · Cited by 4,500
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060 · cited 4×
“…prefrontal cortex, IFG, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and posterior cingulate gyrus) identified in a recent comprehensive meta-analysis by Binder et al., 2009, see also Schwartz et al., 2009, for an excellent discussion of the clinical evidence on regions involved in conceptual…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSpeaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. N. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,036
Speed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/381520a0 · Cited by 3,538
A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.
Dell, G. S. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.283 · Cited by 3,236 · cited 3×
“With respect to the insula, this pattern of reports is better compatible with a role in articulatory planning as suggested by Dronkers (1996) than a role in articulatory execution.”
BackgroundHickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011 · Cited by 2,212 · cited 4×
“, 1996; Hirano et al., 1997). An involvement of the bilateral STG in the internal loop of self-monitoring is suggested by data from Shergill et al. (2002) who manipulated the rate of inner speech. More recently, Tourville et al. (2008) used feedback with a shifted first formant frequency and applied SEM to the resulti…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe spatial and temporal signatures of word production components
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001 · Cited by 2,144 · cited 8×
“Keywords: language production, word production, picture naming, neuroimaging”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationCognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia
Gorno‐Tempini, M. L., Dronkers, N. F., Rankin, K. P., Ogar, J. M., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H. J., Johnson, J. K., Weiner, M. W., & Miller, B. L. (2004) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.10825 · Cited by 1,657 · cited 1×
“Gorno-Tempini and colleagues (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2004, 2008; Henry and Gorno-Tempini, 2010; Wilson et al., 2010) described a so-called logopenic variant of PPA in which mainly gray matter in the mid to posterior temporal lobe is affected1.”
BackgroundVentral and dorsal pathways for language
Saur, D., Kreher, B. W., Schnell, S., Kümmerer, D., Kellmeyer, P., Vry, M., Umarova, R. M., Musso, M., Glauche, V., Abel, S., et al. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805234105 · Cited by 1,617
Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validation
Turkeltaub, P. E., Eden, G. F., Jones, K. M., & Zeffiro, T. A. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1131 · Cited by 1,604
Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.
Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.4.801 · Cited by 1,489 · cited 3×
“COMPONENT PROCESSES OF WORD PRODUCTION Models of language production (Garrett, 1980; Stemberger, 1985; Dell, 1986; Butterworth, 1989; Levelt, 1989; Caramazza, 1997; Dell et al., 1997; Levelt et al., 1999) agree that there are processing levels of meaning, form, and articulation.”
BackgroundMethodCortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere
Ojemann, G. A., Ojemann, J. G., Lettich, E., & Berger, M. S. (1989) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1989.71.3.0316 · Cited by 1,487 · cited 1×
“…brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann et al., 1989; Schäffler et al., 1993; Haglund et al., 1994; Malow et al., 1996; Hamberger et al., 2001; Stewart et al., 2001).”
BackgroundOn Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework
Hagoort, P. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004 · Cited by 1,411
A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking
Roelofs, A. (1992) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-f · Cited by 1,192 · cited 2×
“The I&L estimate for the duration of lemma retrieval was based on mathematical modeling of the semantic interference effect (Levelt et al., 1991; Roelofs, 1992), suggesting a lemma retrieval duration of 100–150 ms and electrophysiological data by Schmitt et al. (2001) suggesting that grammatical…”
MethodA new brain region for coordinating speech articulation
Dronkers, N. F. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/384159a0 · Cited by 1,192 · cited 1×
“With respect to the insula, this pattern of reports is better compatible with a role in articulatory planning as suggested by Dronkers (1996) than a role in articulatory execution.”
Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception
Hickok, G. S., & Poeppel, D. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01463-7 · Cited by 1,186 · cited 2×
“Secondly, the influential dualstream model of speech processing (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000, 2004, 2007) assumes an area at the boundary between temporal and parietal lobes (area Spt) to function as a sensorimotor interface in language production.”
BackgroundMethodHow Many Levels of Processing Are There in Lexical Access?
Caramazza, A. (1997) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/026432997381664 · Cited by 1,165 · cited 3×
“COMPONENT PROCESSES OF WORD PRODUCTION Models of language production (Garrett, 1980; Stemberger, 1985; Dell, 1986; Butterworth, 1989; Levelt, 1989; Caramazza, 1997; Dell et al., 1997; Levelt et al., 1999) agree that there are processing levels of meaning, form, and articulation.”
BackgroundLevels of processing in sentence production
Garrett, M. F. (1980) · Max Planck Digital Library · Cited by 771
The logopenic/phonological variant of primary progressive aphasia
Gorno‐Tempini, M., Brambati, S. M., Ginex, V., Ogar, J., Dronkers, N. F., Marcone, A., Perani, D., Garibotto, V., Cappa, S. F., & Miller, B. L. (2008) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000320506.79811.da · Cited by 731 · cited 2×
“…is characterized by anomia and phonemic paraphasias in confrontation naming, an impairment of verbal short-term memory functions, and an absence of the phonological similarity effect on letter recall, whereas conceptual knowledge seems to be relatively unaffected (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2008).”
BackgroundBrain organization for language from the perspective of electrical stimulation mapping
Ojemann, G. A. (1983) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00015491 · Cited by 710 · cited 1×
“…brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann et al., 1989; Schäffler et al., 1993; Haglund et al., 1994; Malow et al., 1996; Hamberger et al., 2001; Stewart et al., 2001).”
BackgroundNeural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech
Tourville, J. A., Reilly, K. J., & Guenther, F. H. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.054 · Cited by 649
The time course of lexical access in speech production: A study of picture naming.
Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H. J., Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T., & Havinga, J. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.1.122 · Cited by 636 · cited 2×
“The I&L estimate for the duration of lemma retrieval was based on mathematical modeling of the semantic interference effect (Levelt et al., 1991; Roelofs, 1992), suggesting a lemma retrieval duration of 100–150 ms and electrophysiological data by Schmitt et al. (2001) suggesting that grammatical…”
MethodConnected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia
Wilson, S. M., Henry, M. L., Besbris, M., Ogar, J. M., Dronkers, N. F., Jarrold, W., Miller, B. L., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq129 · Cited by 546 · cited 1×
“Gorno-Tempini and colleagues (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2004, 2008; Henry and Gorno-Tempini, 2010; Wilson et al., 2010) described a so-called logopenic variant of PPA in which mainly gray matter in the mid to posterior temporal lobe is affected1.”
BackgroundBilingual language control: An event-related brain potential study
Christoffels, I. K., Firk, C., & Schiller, N. O. (2007) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.01.137 · Cited by 524 · cited 6×
“Christoffels et al., 2007b, see also van de Ven et al., 2009) studied self-monitoring using verbal feedback without distortion.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrain regions involved in articulation
Wise, R., Greene, J., Büchel, C., & Scott, S. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07491-1 · Cited by 517 · cited 1×
“…IFG (Broca’s area) was the only remaining core area that was not more often reported in experiments using overt responses (see Murphy et al., 1997; Wise et al., 1999; Huang et al., 2001; and more recently Ackermann and Riecker, 2004, for the absence of Broca’s area activation in direct…”
BackgroundCortical Localization of Temporal Lobe Language Sites in Patients with Gliomas
Haglund, M. M., Berger, M. S., Shamseldin, M., Lettich, E., & Ojemann, G. A. (1994) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/00006123-199404000-00001 · Cited by 455 · cited 2×
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundSequential Processing of Lexical, Grammatical, and Phonological Information Within Broca’s Area
Sahin, N. T., Pinker, S., Cash, S. S., Schomer, D., & Halgren, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1174481 · Cited by 452
Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model.
Dell, G. S., Burger, L. K., & Svec, W. R. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.123 · Cited by 443
Lexical competition and the acquisition of novel words
Gaskell, M. G., & Dumay, N. (2003) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00070-2 · Cited by 399 · cited 1×
“Gaskell and Dumay (2003) showed that pseudowords only become fully integrated in the lexicon, i.e., showing competition effects on phonologically similar words) after consolidation during a sleep phase.”
BackgroundThe neural correlates of language production
Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2000) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 395
Self-citationDynamics of brain activation during picture naming
Salmelin, R. H., Hari, R., Lounasmaa, O. V., et al. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/368463a0 · Cited by 381 · cited 3×
“To date, four MEG studies (Salmelin et al., 1994; Levelt et al., 1998; Sörös et al., 2003; Hultén et al., 2009) provide timing data on the activation of posterior STG and MTG.”
BackgroundMethodSchwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Walker, G. M., Faseyitan, O. K., Brecher, A. R., Dell, G. S., & Coslett, H. B. (2009) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awp284 · Cited by 376 · cited 2×
“Analyzing data from 64 aphasic patients, Schwartz et al. (2009) found a significant association between semantic errors in language production and lesions in three cortical areas: the left prefrontal lobe, the left posterior MTG, and the left anterior to mid MTG. Importantly, after factoring out…”
BackgroundEffects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words.
Damian, M., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(01)00135-4 · Cited by 351 · cited 4×
“It is, therefore, fortunate, that one of the first studies using a hypothesis-testing approach in an fMRI experiment on word production (de Zubicaray et al., 2001) investigated the neural correlates of lemma selection. They used a semantic picture-word interference paradigm. In this paradigm, competition at the lemma…”
BackgroundInfluentialThe contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production: A review and a hypothesis
Ackermann, H., & Riecker, A. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/s0093-934x(03)00347-x · Cited by 343 · cited 11×
“, 2001; and more recently Ackermann and Riecker, 2004, for the absence of Broca’s area activation in direct comparisons of overt and covert responses). The somewhat indirect conclusion that Broca’s area is the most likely candidate area for syllabification has more recently been challenged for different reasons. First…”
BackgroundInfluentialfMRI reveals two distinct cerebral networks subserving speech motor control
Riecker, A., Mathiak, K., Wildgruber, D., Erb, M., Hertrich, I., Grodd, W., & Ackermann, H. (2005) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000152156.90779.89 · Cited by 327 · cited 1×
“In another study, insular activation increased linearly with syllable repetition rate (Riecker et al., 2005).”
BackgroundLearning and Consolidation of Novel Spoken Words
Davis, M. H., Betta, A. M. D., Macdonald, M. J. E., & Gaskell, M. G. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21059 · Cited by 317 · cited 2×
“Davis et al. (2008) linked this behavioral effect to changes in hemodynamic activation.”
BackgroundStrijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp153 · Cited by 314 · cited 6×
“Both in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and in electroencephalography (EEG) methods have been developed that allow for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAn MEG Study of Picture Naming
Levelt, W. J. M., Praamstra, P., Meyer, A. S., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. H. (1998) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892998562960 · Cited by 308 · cited 1×
“To date, four MEG studies (Salmelin et al., 1994; Levelt et al., 1998; Sörös et al., 2003; Hultén et al., 2009) provide timing data on the activation of posterior STG and MTG.”
BackgroundMonitoring the Time Course of Phonological Encoding
Wheeldon, L. R., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1995) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1014 · Cited by 286 · cited 5×
“Wheeldon and Levelt (1995) measured a 125 ms difference between RTs for the first and the last phoneme of bisyllabic words with on average six phonemes. van Turennout et al. (1997) measured a corresponding 80 ms difference for words with on average 4.5 phonemes.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialLexical Access in Speech Production
Butterworth, B. L. (1989) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4213.003.0007 · Cited by 285 · cited 2×
“Based on the comparison of chronometric data from reaction time studies, modeling data, and electrophysiological studies, I&L provided the following estimates for the duration of the different processing components in the picture naming task: Conceptual preparation (from picture onset to selection…”
BackgroundMethodSpeed of processing in the human visual system
Thorpe, S. J., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72148-8 · Cited by 282 · cited 2×
“The I&L estimate for the duration of conceptual preparation until the selection of a target concept was based on data showing the availability of information about whether a picture showed an animal or not (Thorpe et al., 1996, around 150 ms; Schmitt et al., 2000, around 200 ms).”
BackgroundMethodBrain Activity During Speaking: From Syntax to Phonology in 40 Milliseconds
van Turennout, M., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5363.572 · Cited by 275 · cited 1×
“The I&L estimate for the duration of phonological code retrieval was based on the difference between the lateralized readiness potential (LRP) onsets for a grammatical gender compared to a first phoneme decision in a study by van Turennout et al. (1998).”
MethodA systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production
Eickhoff, S. B., Heim, S., Zilles, K., & Amunts, K. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0287 · Cited by 259 · cited 2×
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodFunctional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D., & Frith, C. (1996) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/119.3.907 · Cited by 257
Neural correlates of verbal feedback processing: an fMRI study employing overt speech
Christoffels, I. K., Formisano, E., & Schiller, N. O. (2007) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20315 · Cited by 254 · cited 7×
“Christoffels et al., 2007b, see also van de Ven et al., 2009) studied self-monitoring using verbal feedback without distortion.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialComprehending written language: a blueprint of the reader
Perfetti, C. A. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198507932.003.0006 · Cited by 244
Some neurophysiological constraints on models of word naming
Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Desai, R. H., Conant, L. L., & Liebenthal, E. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.029 · Cited by 238 · cited 1×
“A more recent study by Binder et al. (2005) suggests that this area and the adjacent angular gyrus can even be deactivated for pseudoword reading compared to a fixation condition.”
BackgroundThe time course of word retrieval revealed by event-related brain potentials during overt speech
Costa, A., Strijkers, K., Martin, C. D., & Thierry, G. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908921106 · Cited by 236 · cited 3×
“…for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g., Christoffels et al., 2007a; Koester and Schiller, 2008; Costa et al., 2009; Strijkers et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodSpatiotemporal imaging of cortical activation during verb generation and picture naming
Edwards, E., Nagarajan, S. S., Dalal, S. S., Canolty, R. T., Kirsch, H. E., Barbaro, N. M., & Knight, R. T. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.035 · Cited by 219 · cited 4×
“…studies (e.g., Sörös et al., 2003; Hultén et al., 2009) and the use of intracranial electrophysiology in neurosurgical patients (Sahin et al., 2009; Edwards et al., 2010) the main development has been the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for temporarily stimulating or…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialComparing cortical activations for silent and overt speech using event-related fMRI
Huang, J., Carr, T. H., & Cao, Y. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1060 · Cited by 216 · cited 1×
“…was the only remaining core area that was not more often reported in experiments using overt responses (see Murphy et al., 1997; Wise et al., 1999; Huang et al., 2001; and more recently Ackermann and Riecker, 2004, for the absence of Broca’s area activation in direct comparisons of overt and…”
Backgroundde Zubicaray, G. I., Wilson, S. J., McMahon, K. L., & Muthiah, S. (2001) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1054 · Cited by 210 · cited 4×
“…imaging (fMRI) and in electroencephalography (EEG) methods have been developed that allow for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g.,…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialvan Turennout, M., Peter Hagoort, A., & Brown, C. M. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037//0278-7393.23.4.787 · Cited by 208
An fMRI investigation of covertly and overtly produced mono- and multisyllabic words
SHUSTER, L., & LEMIEUX, S. (2005) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.07.007 · Cited by 205 · cited 1×
“Shuster and Lemieux (2005) compared the overt production of multisyllabic words to the production of monosyllabic words.”
BackgroundSchmitt, B., Münte, T. F., & Marta Kutas, A. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3740473 · Cited by 201 · cited 2×
“…information taken from Rodriguez-Fornells et al. (2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) were approximately 170, 140, and 90 ms. Schmitt et al. (2000) reported a N200 peak difference of 90 ms. Adding the estimate of 200 ms for conceptual preparation, these numbers suggest an…”
BackgroundOn the Tip-of-the-Tongue: Neural Correlates of Increased Word-finding Failures in Normal Aging
Shafto, M. A., Burke, D. M., Stamatakis, E. A., Tam, P. P., & TYLER, L. K. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.2060 · Cited by 197 · cited 1×
“By contrast Shafto et al. (2007) found age-related word finding problems to be correlated with gray matter atrophy in the left insula but not the posterior temporal lobe.”
BackgroundA Common Neural Substrate for Language Production and Verbal Working Memory
Acheson, D. J., Hamidi, M., Binder, J. R., & Postle, B. R. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21519 · Cited by 194 · cited 4×
“Acheson et al. (2011) found a significant facilitating TMS effect on response latencies when the left mid MTG but not when the left posterior STG was stimulated between 100 ms before and 200 ms after picture onset.”
BackgroundInfluentialMaess, B., Friederici, A., Damian, M., Meyer, A., & Levelt, W. (2002) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892902317361967 · Cited by 193 · cited 4×
“Lexical selection in word production was also targeted in an MEG study on picture naming (Maess et al., 2002) by use of the semantic category interference paradigm.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialFrom phonemes to articulatory codes: an fMRI study of the role of Broca's area in speech production
Papoutsi, M., de Zwart, J. A., Jansma, J. M., Pickering, M. J., Bednar, J. A., & Horwitz, B. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhn239 · Cited by 190 · cited 3×
“To date only one study (Papoutsi et al., 2009) used an experimental variable (biphone frequency) that convincingly disentangles syllabification from later phonetic and motor processing stages and confirmed a pattern predicted for syllabification in a subregion of Broca’s area.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Left Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Participates Specifically in Accessing Lexical Phonology
Graves, W. W., Grabowski, T. J., Mehta, S. H., & Gupta, P. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20113 · Cited by 183 · cited 6×
“A third recent development in fMRI research on word production is the use of repetition suppression or adaptation paradigms (e.g., Graves et al., 2008; Peeva et al., 2010).”
MethodInfluentialModulation of activity in temporal cortex during generation of inner speech
Shergill, S. S., Brammer, M. J., Fukuda, R., Bullmore, E., Amaro, E., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.10046 · Cited by 182 · cited 1×
“An involvement of the bilateral STG in the internal loop of self-monitoring is suggested by data from Shergill et al. (2002) who manipulated the rate of inner speech.”
BackgroundGraves, W. W., Grabowski, T. J., Mehta, S., & Gordon, J. K. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.4.617 · Cited by 178 · cited 2×
“Graves et al. (2007) manipulated three variables (lexical frequency, object familiarity, and word length) to study effects at lexical phonological, semantic, and articulatory processing stages.”
BackgroundMethodEffect of word and syllable frequency on activation during lexical decision and reading aloud
Carreiras, M., Mechelli, A., & Price, C. J. (2006) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20236 · Cited by 155 · cited 1×
“Carreiras et al. (2006) also favor a role in articulatory planning based on their finding of a syllable frequency effect in the left anterior insula.”
BackgroundCerebral areas associated with motor control of speech in humans
Murphy, K., Corfield, D. R., Guz, A., Fink, G. R., Wise, R. J. S., Harrison, J., & Adams, L. (1997) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1997.83.5.1438 · Cited by 149 · cited 3×
“Peeva et al. (2010) found fMRI adaptation for repeated syllables in the left ventral premotor cortex, suggesting syllablelevel representations in this region.”
BackgroundElectrophysiological Chronometry of Semantic Context Effects in Language Production
Aristei, S., Melinger, A., & Rahman, R. A. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21474 · Cited by 141 · cited 4×
“In a complex design combining semantic blocking and picture-word interference, Aristei et al. (2011) found increases in naming latencies of category coordinates for both manipulations.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAnatomic dissociation of auditory and visual naming in the lateral temporal cortex
Hamberger, M. J., Goodman, R. R., Perrine, K. R., & Tamny, T. R. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.1.56 · Cited by 140 · cited 2×
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundMorphological priming in overt language production: Electrophysiological evidence from Dutch
Koester, D., & Schiller, N. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.043 · Cited by 138 · cited 1×
“…for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g., Christoffels et al., 2007a; Koester and Schiller, 2008; Costa et al., 2009; Strijkers et al., 2010).”
BackgroundPeeva, M. G., Guenther, F. H., Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castanon, A., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., & Alario, F.-X. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.065 · Cited by 135 · cited 3×
“The study of Peeva et al. (2010) is a nice example of this approach.”
BackgroundHeim, S., Eickhoff, S. B., & Amunts, K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.06.044 · Cited by 123 · cited 3×
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodHanulová, J., Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2010) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690965.2010.509946 · Cited by 120 · cited 4×
“In a study by Hanulová et al. (2011) N200 nogo responses were contingent on a man-made/natural decision, showing an N200 onset latency of around 300 ms. Note that the latency of N200 responses includes the time needed for the decision to withhold the button press, so that the information on which…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationRiecker, A., Ackermann, H., Wildgruber, D., Meyer, J., Dogil, G., Haider, H., & Grodd, W. (2000) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2356 · Cited by 114 · cited 1×
“By contrast, Ackermann and Riecker (2004) and Riecker et al. (2000) directly compared overt and covert responses and found insular activation only for overt responses.”
BackgroundBrain regions underlying word finding difficulties in temporal lobe epilepsy
Trébuchon, A., Guedj, É., Alario, F. ‐., Laguitton, V., MUNDLER, O., Chauvel, P., & Liégeois‐Chauvel, C. (2009) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awp083 · Cited by 113 · cited 1×
“In patients with temporal lobe epilepsy, Trebuchon-Da Fonseca et al. (2009) found a relationship between TOT states and reduced resting-state metabolism (measured with 18-fluoro-2-desoxy-dglucose-PET) in the left inferior parietal lobe and the posterior superior and inferior temporal cortex.”
Schmitt, B., Schiltz, K., Zaake, W., Marta Kutas, A., & Münte, T. F. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290152001925 · Cited by 112 · cited 1×
“…interference effect (Levelt et al., 1991; Roelofs, 1992), suggesting a lemma retrieval duration of 100–150 ms and electrophysiological data by Schmitt et al. (2001) suggesting that grammatical gender information is available about 75 ms later than conceptual information about the physical…”
BackgroundWilson, S. M., Isenberg, A. L., & Hickok, G. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20782 · Cited by 110 · cited 2×
“This study, thus, provides much stronger support than previous studies for an involvement of anterior to mid temporal regions in lemma selection, which had been called into question by some authors (e.g., Wilson et al., 2009).”
BackgroundResultRodríguez‐Fornells, A. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00188-9 · Cited by 108 · cited 2×
“Two more recent studies (Rodriguez-Fornells et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2005) also used paradigms in which go/nogo responses were contingent on an animal/object decision.”
BackgroundResultde Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M., & Pringle, A. J. (2006) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20227 · Cited by 108 · cited 1×
“In a more recent study, de Zubicaray et al., 2006, see, however, Abel et al., 2009, for a negative finding in left mid MTG in a similar contrast) ruled out this possible concern by showing increased mid STG and posterior STG activation for the naming of target words that were preceded by the…”
BackgroundCortical processing mechanism for vocalization with auditory verbal feedback
Hirano, S., Kojima, H., Naito, Y., Honjo, I., Kamoto, Y., Okazawa, H., Ishizu, K., Yonekura, Y., Nagahama, Y., Fukuyama, H., et al. (1997) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-199707070-00055 · Cited by 107 · cited 1×
“…the bilateral STG in the external loop of self-monitoring based on studies showing additional bilateral superior temporal activations by distorting the subjects’ feedback of their own voice or presenting the subjects with alien feedback while they spoke (McGuire et al., 1996; Hirano et al., 1997).”
BackgroundMultiple perspectives on word production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99451775 · Cited by 107
Sörös, P., Cornelissen, K. K., Laine, M., & Salmelin, R. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00217-9 · Cited by 105 · cited 6×
“Including more recent MEG and TMS studies there are now five studies providing temporal data on left IFG activation in picture naming (Salmelin et al., 1994; Sörös et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006; Hultén et al., 2009; Schuhmann et al., 2009) summarized in Table 3.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLearning new names for new objects: Cortical effects as measured by magnetoencephalography☆
Cornelissen, K. K., Laine, M., Renvall, K., et al. (2004) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2003.12.007 · Cited by 103 · cited 3×
“In an fMRI study using the picture-word interference paradigm, de Zubicaray et al. (2002) targeted lexical word form retrieval by using distractor words that were phonologically related to the picture names.”
MethodResultWhat the Brain Does before the Tongue Slips
Moller, J., Jansma, B. M., Rodríguez‐Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl028 · Cited by 100 · cited 1×
“The SMA and/or the anterior cingulum also seem to be involved in internal speech monitoring (Möller et al., 2007).”
BackgroundCortical dynamics of visual/semantic vs. phonological analysis in picture confrontation
Vihla, M., Laine, M., & Salmelin, R. H. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.06.040 · Cited by 98 · cited 3×
“Including more recent MEG and TMS studies there are now five studies providing temporal data on left IFG activation in picture naming (Salmelin et al., 1994; Sörös et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006; Hultén et al., 2009; Schuhmann et al., 2009) summarized in Table 3.”
MethodSeeing what we know and understand: How knowledge shapes perception
Rahman, R. A., & Sommer, W. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.6.1055 · Cited by 94 · cited 4×
“However, as shown by Abdel Rahman and Sommer (2003), the relatively late availability of more peripheral conceptual information, such as the kind of food an animal prefers, does not delay lemma and word form retrieval, suggesting that conceptual processing continues to run in parallel with subsequent processing stages.”
BackgroundInfluentialde Zubicaray, G. I., McMahon, K. L., Eastburn, M., & Wilson, S. J. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1135 · Cited by 92 · cited 2×
“In an fMRI study using the picture-word interference paradigm, de Zubicaray et al. (2002) targeted lexical word form retrieval by using distractor words that were phonologically related to the picture names.”
BackgroundMethodThe separation of processing stages in a lexical interference fMRI-paradigm
Abel, S., Dressel, K., Bitzer, R., Kümmerer, D., Mader, I., Weiller, C., & Huber, W. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.018 · Cited by 90 · cited 2×
“In a more recent study, de Zubicaray et al., 2006, see, however, Abel et al., 2009, for a negative finding in left mid MTG in a similar contrast) ruled out this possible concern by showing increased mid STG and posterior STG activation for the naming of target words that were preceded by the…”
BackgroundThe logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia
Henry, M., & Gorno-Tempini, M. (2010) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0b013e32833fb93e · Cited by 88
Hocking, J., McMahon, K. L., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21114 · Cited by 87 · cited 3×
“Using a similar paradigm in an arterial spin labeling fMRI study with overt naming, Hocking et al. (2009) observed hippocampal and left mid to posterior STG activation but no mid MTG activation in the semantic blocking condition (see Frontiers in Psychology | Language Sciences October 2011 | Volume…”
BackgroundMethodComprehension deficits elicited by electrical stimulation of Broca's area
Schäffler, L., Lüders, H. O., Dinner, D. S., Lesser, R. P., & Chelune, G. J. (1993) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/116.3.695 · Cited by 84
Left posterior BA37 is involved in object recognition: a TMS study
Stewart, L., Meyer, B.-U., Uta Frith, A., & Rothwell, J. C. (2001) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(00)00084-1 · Cited by 83 · cited 2×
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundCortical Stimulation Elicits Regional Distinctions in Auditory and Visual Naming
Malow, B. A., Blaxton, T. A., Sato, S., et al. (1996) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00020.x · Cited by 82 · cited 2×
“To find out which of these regions are in fact necessary for word production (rather than just somehow involved), Indefrey (2007) compared them with brain areas in which transient lesions induced by electrocortical or TMS stimulation reliably interfered with picture naming across seven studies (Ojemann, 1983; Ojemann…”
BackgroundThe temporal characteristics of functional activation in Broca's area during overt picture naming
Schuhmann, T., Schiller, N. O., Goebel, R., et al. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.10.013 · Cited by 82 · cited 7×
“, 2010) the main development has been the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) as a tool for temporarily stimulating or interfering with neuronal activity in specific brain regions at a specific time (Schuhmann et al., 2009; Acheson et al., 2011).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAccessing newly learned names and meanings in the native language
Hultén, A., Vihla, M., Laine, M., et al. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20561 · Cited by 73 · cited 5×
“Including more recent MEG and TMS studies there are now five studies providing temporal data on left IFG activation in picture naming (Salmelin et al., 1994; Sörös et al., 2003; Vihla et al., 2006; Hultén et al., 2009; Schuhmann et al., 2009) summarized in Table 3.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBrain-imaging studies of language production
Indefrey, P. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198568971.013.0033 · Cited by 72 · cited 8×
“Indefrey and Levelt (2000, 2004, see also Indefrey, 2007) conducted comprehensive meta-analyses of word production studies that had used the mapping approach. They first analyzed the tasks with respect to lead-in processes preceding word production and core word production processes as assumed by psycholinguistic mode…”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationvan de Ven, V., Esposito, F., & Christoffels, I. K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.057 · Cited by 72 · cited 2×
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundPeter Hagoort, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181675 · Cited by 66 · cited 1×
“Considering that this activation was sensitive to word-frequency and that I&L suggested a time window for lemma selection between 175 and 250 ms, the authors (and also Hagoort and Levelt, 2009) interpreted this result as indicating a role of Broca’s area in lexical access in word production.”
ResultName agreement in picture naming: an ERP study.
Cheng, X.-R., Schafer, G., & Akyürek, E. (2010) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.03.003 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“Results from an ERP study comparing the naming of pictures with high and low name agreement (Cheng et al., 2010) also show an early effect (100–150 ms) probably due to object recognition difficulty being one source of low name agreement.”
Naming of newly learned objects: A PET activation study
Gronholm, P. C., Rinne, J. O., Vorobyev, V., & Laine, M. (2005) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.06.010 · Cited by 59 · cited 4×
“(2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) also provided N200 onset times for first phoneme decisions around 460, 400, and 390 ms.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialTime Course of Evoked-potential Changes in Different Forms of Anomia in Aphasia
Laganaro, M., Morand, S. M., & Schnider, A. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21117 · Cited by 55 · cited 2×
“Three other studies (Christoffels et al., 2007a; Laganaro et al., 2009b; Strijkers et al., 2010) investigated the time course of the electrophysiological effects of lexical frequency and cognate status (the target language name of the depicted object sounds/doesn’t sound similar in another language…”
BackgroundDoes phonological encoding in speech production always follow the retrieval of semantic knowledge?
Rahman, R. A., & Sommer, W. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00305-1 · Cited by 55 · cited 4×
“However, as shown by Abdel Rahman and Sommer (2003), the relatively late availability of more peripheral conceptual information, such as the kind of food an animal prefers, does not delay lemma and word form retrieval, suggesting that conceptual processing continues to run in parallel with subsequent processing stages.”
BackgroundInfluentialLeft cytoarchitectonic area 44 supports selection in the mental lexicon during language production
Heim, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Friederici, A. D., & Amunts, K. (2009) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-009-0213-9 · Cited by 53 · cited 3×
“…the interaction between brain areas (structural equation modeling, SEM; dynamic causal modeling, DCM, independent component analysis, ICA) have begun to be applied to word production (Saur et al., 2008; Tourville et al., 2008; Eickhoff et al., 2009; Heim et al., 2009a; van de Ven et al., 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInterference and facilitation in overt speech production investigated with event-related potentials
Hirschfeld, G. H. F., Jansma, B. M., Bölte, J., et al. (2008) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e328309ecd1 · Cited by 53 · cited 1×
“In this study, they, furthermore, showed additional activation of the anterior cingulate (see also Hirschfeld et al., 2008), and inferior prefrontal regions suggesting the involvement of top-down control processes in the naming of target words preceded by distractors.”
BackgroundA systems perspective on the effective connectivity of overt speech production
Eickhoff, S. B., Heim, S., Zilles, K., & Amunts, K. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(09)70789-x · Cited by 52
Dissociating verbal and nonverbal audiovisual object processing
Hocking, J., & Price, C. J. (2008) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2008.10.005 · Cited by 50 · cited 1×
“…October 2011 | Volume 2 | Article 255 | 11 area may thus serve as a common store of lexical word form representations for word production and perception (see also Hocking and Price, 2009, for a lexical phonological effect on left posterior STG activation in comprehension).”
BackgroundSchiller, N. O., Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2003) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0926-6410(03)00204-0 · Cited by 49 · cited 1×
“…2011 | Volume 2 | Article 255 | 3 Table 1 | Continued Study Manipulation Onset/time window of effect (ms) Voice onset time (ms) Processing stage Schiller et al. (2003), ERP: N200 peak latencies Metrical (stress on first or second syllable) vs. syllabification (consonant in first or second…”
Lexical stress encoding in single word production estimated by event-related brain potentials
Schiller, N. O. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.027 · Cited by 47 · cited 3×
“More recently Schiller (2006) measured an N200 peak difference of 58 ms between a lexical stress decision on the first and the second syllable of bisyllabic words, confirming earlier data by Wheeldon and Levelt (1995) and van Turennout et al. (1997) that suggested a phonological encoding duration…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLaganaro, M., Morand, S., Schwitter, V., Zimmermann, C., Camen, C., & Schnider, A. (2009) · Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.09.007 · Cited by 45 · cited 3×
“Three other studies (Christoffels et al., 2007a; Laganaro et al., 2009b; Strijkers et al., 2010) investigated the time course of the electrophysiological effects of lexical frequency and cognate status (the target language name of the depicted object sounds/doesn’t sound similar in another language…”
BackgroundMethodPhonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigation
Bles, M., & Jansma, B. M. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-20 · Cited by 44 · cited 1×
“Bles and Jansma (2008) manipulated the phonological relatedness of unattended distractor pictures and also found activation decreases in the left posterior STG when the distractor pictures were phonologically related.”
Neurophysiological correlates of linearization in language production
Habets, B., Jansma, B. M., & Münte, T. F. (2008) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-9-77 · Cited by 40 · cited 3×
“Considering that this activation was sensitive to word-frequency and that I&L suggested a time window for lemma selection between 175 and 250 ms, the authors (and also Hagoort and Levelt, 2009) interpreted this result as indicating a role of Broca’s area in lexical access in word production. Note, however, that the ta…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialHuettig, F., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.2.341 · Cited by 31 · cited 3×
“A good example in this respect is an eye-tracking study by Huettig and Hartsuiker (2008) who measured very long naming latencies of more than 2000 ms.”
BackgroundInfluentialZhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2009) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2009.06.015 · Cited by 26 · cited 4×
“…et al. (2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) also provided N200 onset times for first phoneme decisions around 460, 400, and 390 ms. Zhang and Damian (2009b) report an N200 onset around 290 ms. Camen et al. (2010) using temporal segmentation analysis observed much earlier ERP…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRole of left superior temporal gyrus during name recall process: An event-related fMRI study
Yagishita, S., Watanabe, T., Asari, T., Ito, H., Kato, M., Ikehira, H., Kanno, I., Suhara, T., & Kikyo, H. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.008 · Cited by 17 · cited 1×
“Yagishita et al. (2008) asked their subjects to name famous faces during fMRI scanning.”
BackgroundCamen, C., Morand, S. M., & Laganaro, M. (2009) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/s10936-009-9124-4 · Cited by 16 · cited 6×
“Camen et al. (2010) using temporal segmentation analysis observed much earlier ERP effects related to a decision on the first phoneme (210–290 ms). The median estimate of the five studies is 390 ms. N200 peak differences between the availability of semantic and first phoneme information taken from Rodriguez-Fornells e…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialExtrafoveal processing of objects in a naming task: Evidence from word probe experiments
Morgan, J. L., van Elswijk, G., & Meyer, A. S. (2008) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.15.3.561 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“Evidence for the retrieval of word form information that does not rely on phoneme monitoring comes from a study by Morgan et al. (2008).”
BackgroundAdaptive pacing of visual stimulation for fMRI studies involving overt speech
Grabowski, T. J., Bauer, M. D., Foreman, D., Mehta, S. H., Eaton, B. L., Graves, W. W., Defoe, D. L., & Bolinger, L. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.08.064 · Cited by 13 · cited 2×
“…(EEG) methods have been developed that allow for overt speaking during experiments (for fMRI see, e.g., de Zubicaray et al., 2001; Grabowski et al., 2006; Christoffels et al., 2007b; Heim et al., 2009b; Hocking et al., 2009; for EEG see, e.g., Christoffels et al., 2007a; Koester…”
MethodFunctional neuroanatomy of verbal self-monitoring
McGuire, P. K., Silbersweig, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (1996) · European Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/0924-9338(96)88510-5 · Cited by 12 · cited 2×
“…the bilateral STG in the external loop of self-monitoring based on studies showing additional bilateral superior temporal activations by distorting the subjects’ feedback of their own voice or presenting the subjects with alien feedback while they spoke (McGuire et al., 1996; Hirano et al., 1997).”
BackgroundZhang, Q., & Damian, M. F. (2009) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.03.049 · Cited by 11 · cited 5×
“…et al. (2002), Guo et al. (2005), and Hanulová et al. (2011) also provided N200 onset times for first phoneme decisions around 460, 400, and 390 ms. Zhang and Damian (2009b) report an N200 onset around 290 ms. Camen et al. (2010) using temporal segmentation analysis observed much earlier ERP…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPeeva, M. G., Guenther, F. H., Tourville, J. A., et al. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(09)71106-1 · Cited by 6
Modulation of activity in temporal cortex during generation of inner speech
Shergill, S. S., Brammer, M. J., Fukuda, R., Bullmore, E. T., Murray, R. M., & McGuire, P. K. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(01)91943-3 · Cited by 4
Opinion: The cortical organization of speech processing
Hickok, G. S., & Poeppel, D. (2007) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 2
Ghosh (2008) · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0119
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing
Levinson, S. C. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.010 · Cited by 820
“Moreover, the language production system is notoriously slow – preparation before output begins takes 600 ms for a single word if primed [7,8], approximately 1000 ms if not [9], and around 1500 ms for a short clause [10].”
Redefining the role of Broca’s area in speech
Flinker, A., Korzeniewska, A., Shestyuk, A. Y., Franaszczuk, P. J., Dronkers, N. F., Knight, R. T., & Crone, N. E. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1414491112 · Cited by 487
“Indefrey and Levelt viewed Broca’s area as critically involved in phonological processing whereas subsequent articulatory encoding is supported by motor cortices (4, 7).”
BackgroundPredicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 581
Timing in turn-taking and its implications for processing models of language
Levinson, S. C., & Torreira, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00731 · Cited by 686
“…serial, and proceeds through conceptualization, lemma retrieval, phonological retrieval, and phonetic encoding, following a time course that seems well understood (Indefrey, 2011), extending 600–1200 ms or more before articulation depending on the ease of retrieval and the length of the turn.”
BackgroundCoupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech
Silbert, L. J., Honey, C. J., Simony, E., Poeppel, D., & Hasson, U. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1323812111 · Cited by 352
“In addition, analytical methods differ greatly between this study and previous ones: Here we measure response reliability, whereas the majority of previous studies measure signal amplitude using eventrelated averaging methods (12, 23).”
MethodResult
Metadata
- Authors
- Indefrey, P.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Indefrey, Peter
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2011
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 255-255
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3191502
- OpenAlex
- W2056949810
- Semantic Scholar
- 1d28a8977f5bd27b32e22401d7ebb700d3eb494b
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 126
- Citations by year
- 2026: 56 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 101 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- word production, neural correlates, picture naming, left inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal cortex, brain structure-function relationship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review