Cited by 87Language Development and DisordersPsychometric Methodologies and TestingVoice and Speech Disorders

Psychometric properties of language assessments for children aged 4–12 years: A systematic review

Open access
Denman, Deborah, Speyer, Renée, Munro, Natalie, Pearce, Wendy M., Chen, Yu-Wei, Cordier, Reinie·2017·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Introduction: Standardized assessments are widely used by speech pathologists in clinical and research settings to evaluate the language abilities of school-aged children and inform decisions about diagnosis, eligibility for services and intervention. Given the significance of these decisions, it is important that assessments have sound psychometric properties. Objective: The aim of this systematic review was to examine the psychometric quality of currently available comprehensive language assessments for school-aged children and identify assessments with the best evidence for use. Methods: Using the PRISMA framework as a guideline, a search of five databases and a review of websites and textbooks was undertaken to identify language assessments and published material on the reliability and validity of these assessments. The methodological quality of selected studies was evaluated using the COSMIN taxonomy and checklist. Results: Fifteen assessments were evaluated. For most assessments evidence of hypothesis testing (convergent and discriminant validity) was identified; with a smaller number of assessments having some evidence of reliability and content validity. No assessments presented with evidence of structural validity, internal consistency or error measurement. Overall, all assessments were identified as having limitations with regards to evidence of psychometric quality. Conclusions: Further research is required to provide good evidence of psychometric quality for currently available language assessments. Of the assessments evaluated, the Assessment of Literacy and Language, the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals- 5th Edition, the Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Preschool: 2nd Edition and the Preschool Language Scales – 5th Edition presented with most evidence and are thus recommended for use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01515

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Carrow-Woolfolk E. (2011). Oral and Written Language Scales, 2nd Edn. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Psychcorp.
  2. Haynes W. O. Pindzola R. H. (2012). Diagnosis and Evaluation in Speech Pathology, 8th Edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Inc.
  3. Paul R. Norbury C. F. (2012a). Chapter 1: Models of child language disorders, in Language Disorders from Infancy through Adolescence: Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writting and Communicating, 4th Edn, eds Paul R. Norbury C. F. (St Louis, MI: Mosby Elsevier), 1– 21.
  4. Paul R. Norbury C. F. (2012c). Chapter 8: Assessment of developing Language, in Language Disorders from Infancy through Adolescence: Listening, Speaking, Reading, Writting and Communicating, 4th Edn, eds Paul R. Norbury C. F. (St Louis, MI: Mosby Elsevier), 280– 346.
  5. Reed V. A. (2005). Assessment, in An Introduction to Children with Language Disorders, 3nd Edn, ed Reed V. A. (Boston, MA: Pearson Education), 404– 442.
  6. Seymour H. N. Roeper T. W. de Villiers J. de Villiers P. A. (2005). Diagnostic Evaluation of Langauge Variation. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Psychcorp.
  7. Wiig E. H. Secord W. A. Semel E. (2004). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals-Preschool, 2nd Edn. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Psychcorp.
  8. Wiig E. H. Semel E. Secord W. A. (2013). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals, 5th Edn. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Psychcorp.
  9. Zimmerman I. L. Steiner V. G. Pond R. E. (2011). Preschool Language Scales, 5th Edn. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Psychcorp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denman, D., Speyer, R., Munro, N., Pearce, W. M., Chen, Y.-W., & Cordier, R.
Affiliations
  • James Cook University (AU)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Denman, Deborah
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2017-09-07
Volume
8
Pages
1515-1515
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2753923668
Cited by
87
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
language assessment, psychometric properties, school-aged children, reliability statistics, validity, content validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, speech-language pathology, standardized testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review