The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox
Open accessAbstract
In the social sciences it is common practice to test specific theoretically motivated research hypotheses using formal statistical procedures. Typically, students in these disciplines are trained in such methods starting at an early stage in their academic tenure. On the other hand, in psychophysical research, where parameter estimates are generally obtained using a maximum-likelihood (ML) criterion and data do not lend themselves well to the least-squares methods taught in introductory courses, it is relatively uncommon to see formal model comparisons performed. Rather, it is common practice to estimate the parameters of interest (e.g., detection thresholds) and their standard errors individually across the different experimental conditions and to 'eyeball' whether the observed pattern of parameter estimates supports or contradicts some proposed hypothesis. We believe that this is at least in part due to a lack of training in the proper methodology as well as a lack of available software to perform such model comparisons when ML estimators are used. We introduce here a relatively new toolbox of Matlab routines called Palamedes which allows users to perform sophisticated model comparisons. In Palamedes, we implement the model-comparison approach to hypothesis testing. This approach allows researchers considerable flexibility in targeting specific research hypotheses. We discuss in a non-technical manner how this method can be used to perform statistical model comparisons when ML estimators are used. With Palamedes we hope to make sophisticated statistical model comparisons available to researchers who may not have the statistical background or the programming skills to perform such model comparisons from scratch. Note that while Palamedes is specifically geared toward psychophysical data, the core ideas behind the model-comparison approach that our paper discusses generalize to any field in which statistical hypotheses are tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
An Introduction to the Bootstrap
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994) · doi:10.1201/9780429246593 · Cited by 40,500
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 · Cited by 10,505
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005) · CHANCE · doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754 · Cited by 4,702 · cited 1×
“P-values and the NHST The usefulness of p-values and the NHST in science has been the subject of continuous debate (e.g., Cohen, 1994; Ioannidis, 2005).”
BackgroundProbability Theory: The Logic of Science
Jaynes, E. T. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790423 · Cited by 4,045
Cohen, J. (1994) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.49.12.997 · Cited by 4,003
Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method
Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03202828 · Cited by 2,410
Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research.
Kline, R. B. (2004) · doi:10.1037/10693-000 · Cited by 1,034
Bayesian adaptive estimation of psychometric slope and threshold
Kontsevich, L. L., & Tyler, C. W. (1999) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00285-5 · Cited by 668
Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2015) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2015.1012991 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Which hand is mine? Discriminating body ownership perception in a two-alternative forced-choice task
Chancel, M., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2020) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02107-x · Cited by 73
Supporting Accessible Data Visualization Through Audio Data Narratives
Siu, A., S-H Kim, G., O'Modhrain, S., & Follmer, S. (2022) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3491102.3517678 · Cited by 64
Castillo-Serrano, J. G., Norman, L. J., Foresteire, D., & Thaler, L. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81220-9 · Cited by 24
Experimentally disambiguating models of sensory cue integration
Scarfe, P. (2022) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/jov.22.1.5 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Prins, N., & Kingdom, F. A. A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-07-23
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 1250-1250
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2810425927
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 22.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01250
- The paper
- Prins, N., & Kingdom, F. A. A. (2018). Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01250
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.