Cited by 11Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The Importance of Alexithymia in Post-surgery. Differences on Body Image and Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Patients

Open access
Gutiérrez Hermoso, Lorena, Velasco Furlong, Lilian, Sánchez-Román, Sofía, Salas Costumero, Lorena·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Breast cancer is a disease that is difficult to face and that often hinders body acceptance. Body changes due to surgery can be very emotionally challenging for those who experience them. The aim of this study is to explore the differences on body image and psychological adjustment on women with breast cancer with high and low alexithymia according to the type of surgery. In this cross-sectional study, 119 women diagnosed with breast cancer (stages I, II, and III) were evaluated with different self-report questionnaires. Afterward, patients were divided into two groups (high and low levels of alexithymia) to analyze dependent variables (body image and psychological adjustment) according to the type of surgery (radical mastectomy or breast conserving therapy). The results of the General Linear Model suggest that when patients show high alexithymia combined with having undergone a radical mastectomy, they show higher levels of Hopelessness. Furthermore, in patients with high alexithymia, higher scores of maladaptive coping styles and greater distortion of body image were found. Alexithymia seems to play an important role in the way in which women cope with their disease, especially in those with radical mastectomy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604004

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Spain, women who had radical mastectomy showed higher levels of hopelessness, body image issues, and psychological distress compared with other groups.

    “Women who had radical mastectomy showed higher levels of hopelessness, body image issues, and had psychological distress when compared with other groups.”

    From Coping in Post-Mastectomy Breast Cancer Survivors and Need for Intervention: Systematic Review. (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Results (pages unavailable) report greater body-image distortion after radical mastectomy and higher hopelessness particularly when mastectomy is combined with high alexithymia. The claim omits that qualification and adds psychological distress as a comparative finding, which the reported surgery comparisons do not establish. The Participants section also shows the sample included women from both Mexico and Spain, not Spain alone. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gutiérrez Hermoso, L., Velasco Furlong, L., Sánchez-Román, S., & Salas Costumero, L.
Affiliations
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (MX)
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-12-18
Volume
11
Pages
604004-604004
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111790060
Cited by
11
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
alexithymia, breast cancer, body image, psychological adjustment, radical mastectomy, breast-conserving therapy, hopelessness, maladaptive coping, body acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review