Cited by 129Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementFamily Support in Illness

A longitudinal study of psychosocial distress in breast cancer: Prevalence and risk factors

Andreu, Yolanda, Galdón, María José, Durá, Estrella, Martínez, Paula, Pérez, Sandra, Murgui, Sergio·2012·Psychology & Health

Abstract

This longitudinal study was conducted among 102 women with non-metastasic breast cancer to identify the time evolution and prevalence of distress at specific times through diagnosis and treatment of disease: preliminary diagnosis, surgery, definitive diagnosis and chemotherapy. Additionally, the study aimed to examine the role of demographic, medical and psychosocial factors on distress. The results indicated that prevalence of distress was higher at initial diagnosis (25%) than the following time points (approximately 17%). The differences inter-individuals in the levels of distress were observed over the four assessments. No relation between distress and demographic and medical factors was found. However, psychosocial aspects were significant risk factors. Patterns of emotional suppression and specific coping responses like helplessness/hopelessness, anxious preoccupation, cognitive avoidance and fatalism were positively related to distress, whereas fighting spirit and perceived social support showed a protective role. Moreover, helplessness/hopelessness and anxious preoccupation jointly predicted 75% of cases and 98% non-cases of distress. Finally, a mediational model between emotional suppression and distress through helplessness/hopelessness was tested. Results support the necessity of routine distress screening all through the illness. Implications of data for psychosocial interventions with breast cancer patients are highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08870446.2010.542814

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andreu, Y., Galdón, M. J., Durá, E., Martínez, P., Pérez, S., & Murgui, S.
Affiliations
Universitat de València (ES)
Corresponding author
Martínez, Paula
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2012-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
72-87
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W2053285137
Cited by
129
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
breast cancer, psychosocial distress, risk factors, emotional suppression, anxious preoccupation, cognitive avoidance, fatalism, fighting spirit, perceived social support, coping, distress screening, psychosocial interventions, non-metastatic breast cancer
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Spain, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review