Electronic Performance Monitoring in the Digital Workplace: Conceptualization, Review of Effects and Moderators, and Future Research Opportunities
Open accessAbstract
The rise of digital and interconnected technology within the workplace, including programs that facilitate monitoring and surveillance of employees is unstoppable. The COVID-19-induced lockdowns and the resulting increase in home office adoption even increased this trend. Apart from major benefits that may come along with such information and communication technologies (e.g., productivity increases, better resource planning, and increased worker safety), they also enable comprehensive Electronic Performance Monitoring (EPM) which may also have negative effects (e.g., increased stress and a reduction in job satisfaction). This conceptual article investigates EPM to better understand the development, adoption, and impact of EPM systems in organizations. The EPM literature published since the 1980s constitutes the basis for this conceptual article. We present a framework which is intended to serve as foundation for future studies. Moreover, we reviewed more than three decades of empirical EPM research and identified six major outcomes that are influenced by the use of an EPM system, as well as a large number of moderator variables. Based on our conceptual analyses and the resulting insights, which also include privacy, ethical, and cultural considerations, we discuss future research opportunities where we also refer to design implications for EPM systems.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736 · see citing works
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As indicated by March and Smith (1995), evaluation refers to how well an artifact works, and metrics have to be used to assess the performance, utility, quality, effects, and/or efficacy of the artifact (Walls et al., 1992; Hevner et al., 2004; Gregor and Jones, 2007).”
BackgroundDuan, Y., Edwards, J. S., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021 · Cited by 2,628 · see citing works
Privacy in the Digital Age: a Review of Information Privacy Research in Information Systems1
Bélanger, F., & Crossler, R. E. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41409971 · Cited by 1,339 · see citing works
A balance theory of job design for stress reduction
Smith, M. J., & Sainfort, P. C. (1989) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0169-8141(89)90051-6 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Call centers as Lean service environments: job-related strain and the mediating role of work design
Sprigg, C. A., & Jackson, P. R. (2006) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.11.2.197 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Stanton, J. M., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.6.738 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kalischko, T., & Riedl, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Kalischko, Thomas
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-05-21
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 633031-633031
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8176029
- OpenAlex
- W3162436046
- Cited by
- 96
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Austrian Science Fund (P30865)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
- Keywords
- electronic performance monitoring, workplace surveillance, employee monitoring, information and communication technologies, remote work, COVID-19 lockdown, occupational stress, job satisfaction, privacy, cultural factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review