Creative Collaboration and Collaborative Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
Studies of creativity emerging from cultural psychology and social psychology perspectives challenge individualist conceptions of creativity to argue that social interaction, communication, and collaboration are key elements in creativity. In recent work creative collaboration has been proposed to be “distributed” between audiences, materials, embodied actions, and the historico-socio-cultural affordances of the creative activity and environment, thus expanding the potentialities of creative collaboration beyond instances of direct human interaction and engagement. Music performance, improvisation and composition may be viewed as exemplary “laboratories” of creative collaboration through the combined elements of audiences, materials, embodied actions and historico-socio-cultural affordances and constraints. This article reports the findings of a systematic literature review of creative collaboration and collaborative creativity in music. We sought to identify what has been currently investigated in relation to these terms and concepts in music, with what methodologies and in what settings. Findings indicate that studies were undertaken in higher education, professional development and professional practice predominantly, leading to an emergent phenomenon of interest, collaborative creative learning. Musical genres were jazz, popular, western classical, contemporary and world musics across the musical processes of composing, improvising and performing. Studies in higher education and professional development settings focused on identifying those practices that supported learning rather than the nature of collaborative creative approaches or the outcomes of creative collaboration. Participants were primarily male, with small sample sizes. Methodologies were largely qualitative with an emphasis on case study using observation, interview and reflective diary methods. Further areas for research include: the investigation of gendered approaches to creative collaboration, collaborative creativity, and collaborative creative learning; the use of more diverse research methodologies and methods and techniques including large-scale quantitative studies and arts-based and arts-led approaches; and the investigation of more diverse music settings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bruner, J. (1996) · doi:10.4159/9780674251083 · Cited by 6,231 · see citing works
Beyond PICO: The SPIDER Tool for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732312452938 · Cited by 2,608 · see citing works
Distributed Creativity: Thinking Outside the Box of the Creative Individual
Glăveanu, V. P. (2014) · SpringerBriefs in Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05434-6 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Amabile T. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York, NY: Springer Verlag.
- Barrett M. (2006). “Creative collaboration”: an “eminence” study of teaching and learning in music composition. Psychol. Music 34, 195– 218. 10.1177/0305735606061852 · DOI
- Barrett M. S. Gromko J. E. (2007). Provoking the muse: a case study of teaching and learning in music composition. Psychol. Music 35, 213– 230. 10.1177/0305735607070305 · DOI
- Bayley A. Lizée N. (2016). Creativity layers and continuities: a case study of Nicole Lizée and the Kronos Quartet. Music. Sci. 20, 393– 412. 10.1177/1029864916631917 · DOI
- Becker H. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Biasutti M. (2015). Creativity in virtual spaces: communication modes employed during collaborative online music composition. Think. Skills Creat. 17, 117– 129. 10.1016/j.tsc.2015.06.002 · DOI
- Biasutti M. (2018). Strategies adopted during collaborative online music composition. Int. J. Music Educ. 36, 473– 490. 10.1177/0255761417741520 · DOI
- Blom D. (2012). Inside the collaborative inter-arts improvisatory process: tertiary music students' perspectives. Psychol. Music 40, 720– 737. 10.1177/0305735611401127 · DOI
- Brinck L. (2017). Jamming and learning: analysing changing collective practice of changing participation. Music Educ. Res. 19, 214– 225. 10.1080/14613808.2016.1257592 · DOI
- Cole M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- de Bruin L. R. (2016). Journeys in jazz education: learning, collaboration, and dialogue in communities of musical practice. Int. J. Community Music 9, 307– 325. 10.1386/ijcm.9.3.307_1 · DOI
- de Bruin L. R. (2019). Improvising musicians' self-regulation and distributed creativities: a phenomenological investigation. Think. Skills Creat. 32, 30– 41. 10.1016/j.tsc.2019.03.004 · DOI
- de Bruin L. R. Williamson P. Wilson E. (2019). Apprenticing the jazz performer through ensemble collaboration: a qualitative enquiry. Int. J. Music Educ. 38, 208– 225. 10.1177/0255761419887209 · DOI
- Delalande F. (2016). Postscript: music composition, creativity, and collaboration–an old story, only recently told. Music Sci. 20, 457– 461. 10.1177/1029864916646719 · DOI
- Dobson E. Littleton K. (2016). Digital technologies and the mediation of undergraduate students' collaborative music compositional practices. Learn. Media Technol. 41, 330– 350. 10.1080/17439884.2015.1047850 · DOI
- Ericsson K. A. (2014). Why expert performance is special and cannot be extrapolated from studies of performance in the general population: a response to criticisms. Intelligence 45, 81– 103. 10.1016/j.intell.2013.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Freeman J. Godfrey M. (2010). Creative collaboration between audiences and musicians in Flock. Digit. Creat. 21, 85– 99. 10.1080/14626261003786244 · DOI
- Freeman J. Van Troyer A. (2011). Collaborative textual improvisation in a laptop ensemble. Comput. Music J. 35, 8– 21. 10.1162/COMJ_a_00053 · DOI
- Glaveanu V. P. (2010a). Paradigms in the study of creativity: introducing the perspective of cultural psychology. New Ideas Psychol. 28, 79– 93. 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2009.07.007 · DOI
- Glaveanu V. P. (2010b). Principles for a cultural psychology of creativity. Cult. Psychol. 16, 147– 163. 10.1177/1354067X10361394 · DOI
- Glaveanu V. P. Gillespie A. Valsiner J. (eds.). (2014). Rethinking Creativity: Contributions From Social and Cultural Psychology. Hove/New York, NY: Routledge.
- Hill B. Fitzgerald J. (2012). Human machine music: an analysis of creative practices among Australian live electronica musicians. Perfect Beat 13, 161– 180. 10.1558/prbt.v13i2.161 · DOI
- Hill M. Hill B. Walsh R. (2018). Conflict in collaborative musical composition: a case study. Psychol. Music 46, 192– 207. 10.1177/0305735617704712 · DOI
- John-Steiner V. (2000). Creative Collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Kenny A. (2014). Collaborative creativity within a jazz ensemble as a musical and social practice. Think. Skills Creat. 13, 1– 8. 10.1016/j.tsc.2014.02.002 · DOI
- Khodyakov D. M. (2007). The complexity of trust-control relationships in creative organizations: insights from a qualitative analysis of a conductorless orchestra. Soc. Forces 86, 1– 22. 10.1353/sof.2007.0100 · DOI
- Lincoln Y. Guba E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
- MacDonald R. Miell D. Wilson G. (2005). Talking about music: a vehicle for identity development, in Musical Communication, eds Miell D. MacDonald R. Hargreaves D. (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 321– 338.
- MacDonald R. A. R. Wilson G. B. (2006). Constructions of jazz: how jazz musicians present their collaborative musical practice. Music. Sci. 10, 59– 83. 10.1177/102986490601000104 · DOI
- Marchini M. Ramirez R. Papiotis P. Maestre E. (2014). The sense of ensemble: a machine learning approach to expressive performance modelling in string quartets. J. New Music Res. 43, 303– 317. 10.1080/09298215.2014.922999 · DOI
- Moher D. Liberati A. Tetzlaff J. Altman D. G. PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. (2009) 6:e1000097. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072 PMC2707599 · DOI · Paper page
- Morgan E. Gunes H. Bryan-Kinns N. (2015). Using affective and behavioural sensors to explore aspects of collaborative music making. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 82, 31– 47. 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.002 · DOI
- Mumford M. D. (ed.). (2012). Handbook of Organizational Creativity. Dan Diego, CA: Academic Press.
- Paulus P. B. Nijstad B. A. (eds.). (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Group Creativity and Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Ravet P. (2016). Negotiated authority, shared creativity: cooperation models among conductors and performers. Music. Sci. 20, 287– 303. 10.1177/1029864915617232 · DOI
- Sawyer R. K. (2017). Group Genius: The Creative Power of Collaboration (Revised Edition). New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Seddon F. A. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation. Br. J. Music Educ. 22, 47– 61. 10.1017/S0265051704005984 · DOI
- Tan L. Tjoeng J. Sin H. X. (2020). “Ngeli”: flowing together in a Gamelan ensemble. Psychol. Music 49, 804– 816. 10.1177/0305735620909482 · DOI
- van Nort D. (2018). Conducting the in-between: improvisation and intersubjective engagement in soundpainted electro-acoustic ensemble performance. Digit. Creat. 29, 68– 81. 10.1080/14626268.2018.1423997 · DOI
- Virkkula E. (2016). Communities of practice in the conservatory: learning with a professional musician. Br. J. Music Educ. 33, 27– 42. 10.1017/S026505171500011X · DOI
- Vygotsky L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Vygotsky L. (1986). Thought and Language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Wilson G. B. MacDonald R. A. R. (2012). The sign of silence: negotiating musical identities in an improvising ensemble. Psychol. Music 40, 558– 573. 10.1177/0305735612449506 · DOI
- Wilson G. B. MacDonald R. A. R. (2017). The construction of meaning within free improvising groups: a qualitative psychological investigation. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 11, 136– 146. 10.1037/aca0000075 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing and understanding creativity in large language models
Zhao, Y., Zhang, R., Li, W., & Li, L. (2025) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-025-1546-4 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Exploring the Collaborative Co-Creation Process with AI: A Case Study in Novice Music Production
Fu, Y., Newman, M., Going, L., Feng, Q., & Lee, J. H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3715336.3735829 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“The creative collaboration has been proposed to be “dis-tributed” among audiences, materials, embodied actions, and the socio-cultural environment, which expand the collaboration concept to beyond direct human collaboration [20].”
Playwriting with Large Language Models: Perceived Features, Interaction Strategies and Outcomes
Grigis, P., & De Angeli, A. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces · doi:10.1145/3656650.3656688 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Social skills are also necessary, as creativity is facilitated by collaboration [7, 26].”
BackgroundExploring the Collaborative Co-Creation Process with AI: A Case Study in Novice Music Production
Fu, Y., Newman, M., Going, L., Feng, Q., & Lee, J. H. (2025) · arXiv · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“The creative collaboration has been proposed to be “dis-tributed” among audiences, materials, embodied actions, and the socio-cultural environment, which expand the collaboration concept to beyond direct human collaboration [20].”
- Authors
- Barrett, M. S., Creech, A., & Zhukov, K.
- Affiliations
- Monash University (AU)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Barrett, Margaret S.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Psychology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-08-09
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 713445-713445
- ISSN
- 1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8380918
- OpenAlex
- W3188645211
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 28.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Australian Research Council
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Keywords
- co-creation, collaborative creativity, music composition, musical improvisation, music performance, distributed creativity, embodied action, audience, music education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review