Cited by 42Misinformation and Its ImpactsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesLiteracy, Media, and Education

The role of self-efficacy beliefs in dealing with misinformation among adolescents

Open access
Paciello, Marinella, Corbelli, Giuseppe, D’Errico, Francesca·2023·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The present study aims to understand the processes involved in misinformation among adolescents by examining the role of self-efficacy beliefs in dealing with misleading news. Specifically, we argue that the perceived capability to analyze and reflect critically on the reliability of online information sources should be stayed with the perceived self-regulatory capability to resist online social pressures to share unverifiable news. Moreover, we posited that specific online self-efficacies beliefs can be promoted by the capabilities related to regulating emotions and reflecting on new problems. In a sample of 273, we tested a path analysis model. The results attest that self-efficacy beliefs in dealing with online misinformation refer to specific capabilities: an active one, related to checking the sources of the news in order to validate their content, and an inhibitory one, related to the capability to refrain from sharing the news that seems unreliable. Moreover, self-efficacy beliefs in self-control during online interaction spreading misleading news are supported by cognitive reflective capability and self-efficacy in regulating negative emotion. The relationship between active self-efficacy related to fact-checking and sharing misleading news is not significant. The role of regulation in sharing misinformation during activated online dynamics is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1155280

Cites

33 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescents with strong assertiveness skills are less likely to become victims of online grooming.

    “This is consistent with the findings of Paciello et al. (2023), who emphasized that adolescents with strong assertiveness skills are less likely to become victims of online grooming.”

    From Surfing Online Safety: Assertiveness and Parental Involvement in Adolescents’ Attitudes Toward Cyber Grooming (2025) · cites this paper as Paciello et al., 2023

    The Introduction and Discussion address adolescents’ self-efficacy in resisting the impulse to share misinformation, not assertiveness or victimization. Searches for online grooming and assertiveness found no passage linking those skills to a lower risk of grooming. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bandura A. (1992). “ Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism,” in Self-efficacy: thought control of action, vol. 1, 3– 37.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paciello, M., Corbelli, G., & D’Errico, F.
Affiliations
  • UniNettuno University (IT)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
Corresponding author
Corbelli, Giuseppe
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2023-05-18
Volume
14
Pages
1155280-1155280
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4377104090
Cited by
38
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1
FWCI
16.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Compagnia di San Paolo (CUP: B99C20000640007, B99C20000640007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literacy, Media, and Education
Keywords
self-efficacy, misinformation, adolescents, online misinformation, fact-checking, self-regulation, emotion regulation, cognitive reflection, source reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review