Cited by 12Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesPalliative and Oncologic CareDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Effects of different psychosocial interventions on death anxiety in patients: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Open access
Lu, Jinhong, Yang, Youzhuan, Chen, Haiyun, Ma, Hongchao, Tan, Yulei·2024·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Objective: This research intended to assess and compare influence of psychosocial interventions in death anxiety in patients, providing evidence-based guidance for both patients and healthcare providers. Design: The present study exclusively gathered randomized controlled trials by comprehensively searching across multiple databases, comprising of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus. The methodological quality of the enrolled studies involved in the analysis was assessed using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and data analysis was performed utilizing appropriate software. Results: This research, encompassing 15 randomized controlled trials with a cumulative sample size of 926 patients, spanned from the earliest possible date to December 2023. The findings of network meta-analysis unveiled that the Rational-Emotive Hospice Care Therapy significantly reduced death anxiety among patients (Sequentially Updated Cumulative Ranking Analysis: 100%). Conclusion: The ranking plot of the network suggested that the rational-emotive hospice care therapy exhibited superior efficacy as a psychological treatment for reducing the death anxiety of patients. Systematic review registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier: [CRD42023484767].

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1362127

Cites

43 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rational-emotive hospice care therapy exhibits superior efficacy as a psychological treatment for reducing death anxiety in patients.

    “J. Lu et al. came to the conclusion that rational-emotive hospice care therapy 'exhibited superior efficacy as a psychological treatment for reducing the death anxiety of patients' [40].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ameri Z. Askari P. Heidarei A. Bakhtiarpour S. (2021). The effectiveness of spirituality therapy training on tolerance to distress and death anxiety among patients with leukemia: a pilot study. Community Health 8, 275– 288. doi: 10.22037/ch.v8i2.31349.F · DOI
  2. Sahebanmaleki M. Zandi A. Sadeghi Z. Nazari H. Eshaghzadeh M. Shafiei Z. J. C. S.. (2021). The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment-based therapy on the death anxiety of patients with advanced cancer. Clin. Schizophr. Relat. Psychoses 15: S9. doi: 10.3371/CSRP.SMAZ.010622. · DOI
  3. Woods B. Behaviour therapy in terminal care: a humanistic approach: Hj Sobel (Ed.). Ballinger, Cambridge, MA (1981).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, J., Yang, Y., Chen, H., Ma, H., & Tan, Y.
Affiliations
Zhujiang Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Lu, Jinhong
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-03-18
Volume
15
Pages
1362127-1362127
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392923622
Cited by
11
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
fear of death, psychosocial interventions, rational emotive behavior therapy, hospice care, end-of-life care, psychological intervention, patient anxiety reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review