The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vancomycin Revisited – 60 Years Later
Open accessAbstract
Vancomycin is one of the older antibiotics that has been now in clinical use close to 60 years. Earlier on, vancomycin was associated with many side effects including vestibular and renal, most likely due to impurities contained in early vancomycin lots. Over the years, the impurities have been removed and the compound has now far less vestibular adverse effects, but still possesses renal toxicity if administered at higher doses rendering trough serum levels of >15 mcg/mL or if administered for prolonged periods of time. Vancomycin is effective against most Gram-positive cocci and bacilli with the exception of rare organisms as well as enterococci that became vancomycin resistant, mostly Enterococcus faecium. The major use of vancomycin today is for infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) and amoxicillin-resistant enterococci. In its oral form, vancomycin is used to treat diarrhea caused by Clsotridium difficile. With S. aureus, there are only a handful of vancomycin-resistant strains. Nevertheless, a "vancomycin creep" that is slow upward trending of vancomycin MIC from <1 mcg/mL to higher values has been noted in several parts of the world, but not globally, and strains that have MIC's of 1.5-2 mcg/mL are associated with high therapeutic failure rates. This phenomenon has also been recently recognized in methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). While vancomycin is relatively a safe agent adverse events include the "red man" syndrome, allergic reactions, and various bone marrow effects as well as nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin has been a very important tool in our therapeutic armamentarium that remained effective for many years, it is likely remain effective as long as resistance to vancomycin remains controlled.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vancomycin Resistance in Gram-Positive Cocci
Courvalin, P. (2006) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/491711 · Cited by 1,028
Howden, B. P., Davies, J. K., Johnson, P. D. R., Stinear, T. P., & Grayson, M. L. (2010) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00042-09 · Cited by 962
Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: why are they here, and where do they come from?
Bonten, M. J., Willems, R., & Weinstein, R. A. (2001) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(01)00145-1 · Cited by 400
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Vancomycin
Matzke, G. R., Zhanel, G. G., & Guay, D. R. P. (1986) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-198611040-00001 · Cited by 360
Fridkin, S. K., Hageman, J., McDougal, L. K., Mohammed, J., Jarvis, W. R., Perl, T. M., Tenover, F. C., & the Vancomycin‐Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Epidemiology Study Group (2003) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/346207 · Cited by 344
Gasch, O., Camoez, M., Dominguez, M. A., Padilla, B., Pintado, V., Almirante, B., Molina, J., Lopez-Medrano, F., Ruiz, E., Martinez, J. A., et al. (2013) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12108 · Cited by 86
Gómez, J., García-Vázquez, E., Baños, R., Canteras, M., Ruiz, J., Baños, V., Herrero, J. A., & Valdés, M. (2007) · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1007/s10096-007-0272-x · Cited by 81
Cited by
Cong, Y., Yang, S., & Rao, X. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2019.10.005 · Cited by 527
Gan, B. H., Gaynord, J., Rowe, S. M., Deingruber, T., & Spring, D. R. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00729c · Cited by 511
Rossetti, P., Trollmann, M. F. W., Wichmann, C., Gutsmann, T., Eggeling, C., & Böckmann, R. A. (2026) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202411476 · Cited by 25
Wu, D., & Zou, Y. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.5c03236 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Rubinstein, E., & Keynan, Y.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Public Health
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-10-31
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 217-217
- ISSN
- 2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1995208533
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vancomycin Revisited – 60 Years Later. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00217
- The paper
- Rubinstein, E., & Keynan, Y. (2014). Vancomycin Revisited – 60 Years Later. Frontiers in Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2014.00217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.