Cited by 113Reproductive Health and TechnologiesNutritional Studies and DietOvarian function and disorders

The Influence of Diet on Fertility and the Implications for Public Health Nutrition in the United States

Open access
Panth, Neelima, Gavarkovs, Adam, Tamez, Martha, Mattei, Josiemer·2018·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

Despite growing evidence of the impact of diet on human fertility, few studies have examined the public health implications of this association in the United States (U.S.). This narrative review summarizes current scientific evidence on associations between dietary intake and fertility, discusses challenges in the public health landscape surrounding infertility, and proposes evidence-based recommendations to address these issues. Diets high in unsaturated fats, whole grains, vegetables, and fish have been associated with improved fertility in both women and men. While current evidence on the role of dairy, alcohol, and caffeine is inconsistent, saturated fats and sugar have been associated with poorer fertility outcomes in women and men. Furthermore, women and men with obesity (body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30kg/m2) have a higher risk of infertility. This risk is extended to women who are underweight (BMI <20 kg/m2). Diet and BMI influence outcomes during clinical treatment for infertility. Further, women in the U.S. who belong to an underrepresented minority group, have low income, or have low educational attainment, have significantly higher rates of infertility outcomes as compared to women who are non-Hispanic white, have high income, or have high educational attainment. Given this, it may be prudent to integrate nutrition counseling into both clinical guidelines for infertility as well as national dietary guidelines for individuals of reproductive age. Further studies on diet and reproductive health may enhance our ability to improve existing fertility programs across the U.S. and to deliver tailored care to women and men within at-risk groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00211

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is well-established that obesity is related to menstrual disorders, infertility, miscarriage, obstetric complications, live birth rate and can affect the success of assisted reproductive technology.

    “It is well-established that obesity is related to menstrual disorders, infertility, miscarriage, obstetric complications, live birth rate and can affect the success of assisted reproductive technology.29–32”

    From Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles (2019) · cites this paper as [31]

    The 'Evidence on diet and fertility > Body mass index' section (page unavailable) links obesity to ovulatory-disorder infertility and lower ART treatment success. It does not establish a relationship with menstrual disorders generally, miscarriage, obstetric complications, or live-birth rate; those additional outcomes are unsupported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Fertility Problems: Assessment And Treatment. Clinical Guideline 156 (2013). 31804780

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panth, N., Gavarkovs, A., Tamez, M., & Mattei, J.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Mattei, Josiemer
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2018-07-31
Volume
6
Pages
211-211
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883048904
Cited by
113
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL120951)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
diet and fertility, infertility, public health nutrition, unsaturated fat, whole grains, fish consumption, saturated fat, sugar consumption, obesity, underweight, body mass index, socioeconomic disparities, underrepresented minorities, nutrition counseling, infertility treatment outcomes, dietary guidelines, reproductive health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review