Cited by 14Reproductive Health and TechnologiesResilience and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Association between quality of life and resilience in infertile patients: a systematic review

Open access
Liu, Kexian, Dou, Shanshan, Qin, Wei, Zhao, Di, Zheng, Wei, Wang, Dan, Zhang, Caixia, Guan, Yichun +1 more·2024·Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract

This systematic review was carried out to describe QoL and resilience in infertile patients, as well as the relationship between them, and to give a theoretical foundation for clinical practice. The databases of CNKI, Wanfang data, VIP database, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without a time limit. A narrative synthesis of relevant articles was undertaken. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO in advance. Of 21 studies eligible for inclusion in this review, 13 focused on the relationship between QoL and resilience, 5 on QoL influencing factors (resilience included), and 3 on mediation effect analysis on mental health (resilience as a mediator). Resilience can significantly predict the QoL of infertile patients. It seems plausible that more resilient couples will be less vulnerable to the stress of infertility. A global consortium of infertile population research could make cross-cultural comparisons of QoL and resilience possible. Future research should focus on resilience therapies. Systematic review registration: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO in advance (CRD42023414706).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1345899

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, K., Dou, S., Qin, W., Zhao, D., Zheng, W., Wang, D., Zhang, C., Guan, Y., & Tian, P.
Affiliations
  • Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guan, Yichun
Venue
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2024-02-27
Volume
12
Pages
1345899-1345899
ISSN
2296-2565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392373825
Cited by
14
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
quality of life, resilience, infertility, couples, stress, mental health, cross-cultural comparison
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infertility, Male, Mental Health, Quality of Life, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review