The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Indigenous Peoples' Rights in Data: a contribution toward Indigenous Research Sovereignty
Open accessAbstract
Indigenous Peoples' right to sovereignty forms the foundation for advocacy and actions toward greater Indigenous self-determination and control across a range of domains that impact Indigenous Peoples' communities and cultures. Declarations for sovereignty are rising throughout Indigenous communities and across diverse fields, including Network Sovereignty, Food Sovereignty, Energy Sovereignty, and Data Sovereignty. Indigenous Research Sovereignty draws in the sovereignty discourse of these initiatives to consider their applications to the broader research ecosystem. Our exploration of Indigenous Research Sovereignty, or Indigenous self-determination in the context of research activities, has been focused on the relationship between Indigenous Data Sovereignty and efforts to describe Indigenous Peoples' Rights in data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“AI data stewardship applies this approach to dataset collection for training AI models, especially when these have knowledge gaps about marginalized communities (cf. [20, 59]).”
From Engaging Communities Meaningfully in Defining Disability Representation for AI Image Generation (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Within this paradigm, AI is governed by Indigenous law and ethics rather than optimisation logics (Hudson et al., 2023;Kukutai & Taylor, 2016).”
From Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings (2026) · cites this paper as Hudson et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Refusal here is not withdrawal; it is an affirmative method to safeguard language, resist extractive infrastructures, and insist that infrastructural choices answer to Indigenous legal orders (Hudson et al., 2023).”
From Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings (2026) · cites this paper as Hudson et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It requires governance boards, binding agreements, and technical protocols granting communities authority over datasets, models, and deployment (Christen & Anderson, 2019b;Hudson et al., 2023).”
From Towards a decolonial AI sovereignty model for indigenous educational settings (2026) · cites this paper as Hudson et al., 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“UNDRIP, the Nagoya Protocol, and the Global Indigenous Data Alliance have detailed numerous rights that Indigenous Peoples have in relation to data (United Nations General Assembly, 1993, 2007; UN Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010; Hudson et al., 2023).”
From Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance (2023) · cites this paper as Hudson et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance
Carroll, S. R., Garba, I., Figueroa-Rodríguez, O. L., Holbrook, J., Lovett, R., Materechera, S., Parsons, M., Raseroka, K., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., Rowe, R., et al. (2020) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2020-043 · Cited by 1,408
Self-citationUnited Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 2007
(2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316677117.041 · Cited by 1,020
A roadmap to increase diversity in genomic studies
Fatumo, S., Chikowore, T., Choudhury, A., Ayub, M., Martin, A. R., & Kuchenbaecker, K. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-021-01672-4 · Cited by 707
(2016) · doi:10.22459/caepr38.11.2016 · Cited by 696
Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures
Carroll, S. R., Herczog, E., Hudson, M., Russell, K., & Stall, S. (2021) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0 · Cited by 483
Self-citationA global assessment of Indigenous community engagement in climate research
David-Chavez, D., & Gavin, M. C. (2018) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aaf300 · Cited by 390
Self-citationScientists' Warning to Humanity on Threats to Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems
Fernández‐Llamazares, Á., Lepofsky, D., Lertzman, K. P., Armstrong, C. G., Brondízio, E. S., Gavin, M. C., Lyver, P. O., Nicholas, G., Pascua, P., Reo, N. J., et al. (2021) · Journal of Ethnobiology · doi:10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.144 · Cited by 388
Self-citationRights, Interests and Expectations: Indigenous Perspectives on Unrestricted Access to Genomic Data
Hudson, M., Garrison, N. A., Sterling, R., Caron, N. R., Fox, K., Yracheta, J., Anderson, J., Wilcox, P., Arbour, L., Brown, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-020-0228-x · Cited by 320
Self-citationIndigenous Data Sovereignty and Policy
Walter, M., Kukutai, T., Carroll, S. R., & Rodriguez-Lonebear, D. (2020) · doi:10.4324/9780429273957 · Cited by 273
Self-citationIndigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations
Carroll, S. R., Rodriguez-Lonebear, D., & Martinez, A. (2019) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2019-031 · Cited by 264
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Anderson, 2019, Decolonizing attribution, J. Rad. Librar., 5, 113
- Duarte, 2017, Network Sovereignty: Building the Internet Across Indian Country.
- Kukutai, 2020, “Indigenous Data Sovereignty,”, 654
- Kukutai, 2023, Māori data sovereignty and privacy. Tikanga in Technology
- WilsonS. Research Is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods (First Edition). Fernwood Publishing2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buchan, M. C., Bhawra, J., & Katapally, T. R. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00293-x · Cited by 176
Applying the ‘CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance’ to ecology and biodiversity research
Jennings, L. L., Anderson, T. G., Martinez, A. O., Sterling, R., David-Chavez, D., Garba, I., Hudson, M. L., Garrison, N. A., & Carroll, S. R. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02161-2 · Cited by 153
Self-citationIndigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance
Garba, I., Sterling, R., Plevel, R., Carson, W., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Cummins, J., Curley, C., David-Chavez, D., Fernandez, A., Hiraldo, D., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2023.1272318 · Cited by 56
Self-citationDavid-Chavez, D., Gavin, M. C., Ortiz, N., Valdez, S., & Carroll, S. R. (2024) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-14768-290211 · Cited by 62
Self-citationCentering Indigenous Knowledges in ecology and beyond
Wolf, J. G., Ignace, D. D., David-Chavez, D., Jennings, L. L., Smiles, N. D., Blanchard, P., Simmons, E., Doan-Crider, D. L., Kills, R. P. S., Montgomery, M., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.2776 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hudson, M., Carroll, S. R., Anderson, J., Blackwater, D., Cordova-Marks, F. M., Cummins, J., David-Chavez, D., Fernandez, A., Garba, I., Hiraldo, D., Jäger, M. B., Jennings, L. L., Martinez, A., Sterling, R., Walker, J. D., & Rowe, R. K.
- Affiliations
- University of Waikato (NZ)
- University of Arizona (US)
- New York University (US)
- Colorado State University (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- McMaster University (CA)
- Queen's University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Hudson, Maui
- ORCID
- Venue
- Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-05-04
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 1173805-1173805
- ISSN
- 2504-0537 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10192690
- OpenAlex
- W4377565371
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 28.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- Ministry for Business Innovation and Employment
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Keywords
- Indigenous data sovereignty, indigenous rights, Indigenous self-determination, Indigenous data governance, Indigenous research ethics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
