The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming
Open accessAbstract
Agriculture is undergoing a new technology revolution supported by policy-makers around the world.While smart technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence, robotics, and the Internet of Things, could play an important role in achieving enhanced productivity and greater eco-efficiency, critics have suggested that the consideration of social implications is being side-lined.Research illustrates that some agricultural practitioners are concerned about using certain smart technologies.Indeed, some studies argue that agricultural societies may be changed, or "re-scripted," in undesirable ways, and there is precedent to suggest that wider society may be concerned about radical new agricultural technologies.We therefore encourage policy-makers, funders, technology companies, and researchers to consider the views of both farming communities and wider society.In agriculture, the concept of responsible innovation has not been widely considered, although two recent papers have made useful suggestions.We build on these interventions by arguing that key dimensions of responsible innovation-anticipation, inclusion, reflexivity, and responsiveness-should be applied to this fourth agricultural revolution.We argue, however, that ideas of responsible innovation should be further developed in order to make them relevant and robust for emergent agri-tech, and that frameworks should be tested in practice to see if they can actively shape innovation trajectories.In making suggestions on how to construct a more comprehensive framework for responsible innovation in sustainable agriculture, we call for: (i) a more systemic approach that maps and attends to the wider ecology of innovations associated with this fourth agricultural revolution; (ii) a broadening of notions of "inclusion" in responsible innovation to account better for diverse and already existing spaces of participation in agri-tech, and (iii) greater testing of frameworks in practice to see if they are capable of making innovation processes more socially responsible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019) · NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 · Cited by 1,307
Enhancing smart farming through the applications of Agriculture 4.0 technologies
Javaid, M., Haleem, A., Singh, R. P., & Suman, R. (2022) · International Journal of Intelligent Networks · doi:10.1016/j.ijin.2022.09.004 · Cited by 573
Lajoie-O'Malley, A., Bronson, K., van der Burg, S., & Klerkx, L. (2020) · Ecosystem Services · doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101183 · Cited by 390
Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet
Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C.-A. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933 · Cited by 346
Self-citationDigitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review
Fielke, S., Taylor, B., & Jakku, E. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102763 · Cited by 331
Metadata
- Authors
- Rose, D. C., & Chilvers, J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-12-21
- Volume
- 2
- ISSN
- 2571-581X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2906617064
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 89.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087
- The paper
- Rose, D. C., & Chilvers, J. (2018). Agriculture 4.0: Broadening Responsible Innovation in an Era of Smart Farming. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.