Cited by 6Organic Food and AgricultureBusiness Strategies and InnovationUrban Agriculture and Sustainability

Developing a local food business model and innovation framework: a systematic literature review

Open access
Fobbe, Lea, Hilletofth, Per·2025·Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems

Abstract

Local food production has been identified as a key lever for advancing sustainable and resilient food systems, yet its development remains limited in scope. To address this challenge, scholars have increasingly examined local food businesses through a business model (BM) perspective, which provides insights into producers’ value intentions and how they propose, create, deliver, and capture value. However, research on these BM components and their potential for innovation has thus far been fragmented and not comprehensively examined. In response, this study conducts a systematic literature review, selecting 44 articles in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Based on this review, the article proposes a local food BM and innovation framework, that includes (i) a comprehensive overview of BM components in the local food context, (ii) preconditions, approaches and 10 strategies for innovating local food BMs, and (iii) a discussion of the interdependencies and multidimensional relationships between BM components and innovation strategies. Finally, the article outlines future research directions and managerial implications to guide both scholars and practitioners in strengthening local food production and advancing the transition towards sustainable food systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fsufs.2025.1703973

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Producers allocate output across direct-to-consumer and direct-to-retail channels, implying different capacities for reaching beyond local consumer bases and accessing larger and more distant markets.

    “Studies confirm that producers allocate output across DTC and DTR channels [21,29], implying different capacities for reaching beyond local consumer bases and the ability to access larger and more distant markets.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fobbe, L., & Hilletofth, P.
Affiliations
University of Gävle (SE)
Corresponding author
Fobbe, Lea
Venue
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Published
2025-12-05
Volume
9
ISSN
2571-581X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4417024081
Cited by
3
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DiVA (University of Gävle) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Dalarna University College Electronic Archive (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Keywords
local food production, local food businesses, business models, business model innovation, innovation strategy, sustainable food systems, food system resilience, value creation, innovation framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review