Cited by 16Digitalization and Economic Development in AgricultureSmart Agriculture and AIAgricultural Economics and Policy

Important policy parameters for the development of inclusive digital agriculture: implications for the redistributive land reform program in South Africa

Open access
Mazwane, Sukoluhle, Makhura, Moraka N., Senyolo, Mmapatla P.·2022·Agriculture

Abstract

The creation and deployment of digital technologies throughout the agro-food system contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goal nine. However, various digitalization studies offer limited insight into the policy issues and solutions around emerging technologies and big data systems in agriculture. There is a need for an additional understanding of how agricultural policymaking should respond to the usage of digital technologies in the agri-food sector. Furthermore, evidence is limited on how existing agricultural government programs such as land reform can be linked with digitalization policy. This systematic review of literature sought to determine the transformation that is needed in the political and economic environment for the digital revolution to take place within South African land reform agriculture. A thematic analysis of data sampled from ProQuest Central, Scopus, Dimensions, and Google Scholar reveals five areas of intervention from agricultural policymaking. The digital revolution in agriculture can be brought about by transforming digital infrastructure, data interoperability and governance, digital markets, the compatibility of government incentives with the private sector, and the digital cultural landscape. This essay contributes to agricultural policy and decision-making dialogues that pay attention to digital technologies and land reform programs in South Africa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agriculture12122129

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fragmented land information systems, limited digitization, and weak monitoring further reduce the Department's ability to evaluate performance, adapt policy, and implement corrective measures in real time.

    “Fragmented land information systems, limited digitization, and weak monitoring further reduce the Department's ability to evaluate performance, adapt policy, and implement corrective measures in real time (Mazwane et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mazwane, S., Makhura, M. N., & Senyolo, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Mpumalanga (ZA)
  • University of Pretoria (ZA)
  • University of Limpopo (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mazwane, Sukoluhle
Venue
Agriculture
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-12-11
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
2129
ISSN
2077-0472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313210625
Cited by
16
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digitalization and Economic Development in Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Economics and Policy
Keywords
digital agriculture, agricultural policy, land reform, digital inclusion, South Africa, SDG 9, digital infrastructure, data interoperability, data governance, digital markets, government incentives, big data in agriculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review