Cited by 13Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant Disease Management TechniquesPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Biocontrol Potential and Mitigation of Abiotic Stress Effects of Meyerozyma guilliermondii on Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)

Open access
Gomez-Garay, Arancha, Bonaventura Roca-Campos, Darío, Irles Sánchez, Sofía, Pintos López, Beatriz·2024·Agriculture

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the biocontrol potential of Meyerozyma guilliermondii (CECT13190), an endophytic yeast, and its role in mitigating the adverse effects of abiotic and biotic stress in cucumber plants. The relevance of this study lies in addressing the threat of Fusarium wilt, a major fungal disease that impacts cucumber crop productivity, as well as the exacerbation of food scarcity caused by climate change-induced abiotic stress factors such as high temperatures and drought. The study was conducted in a greenhouse environment where Cucumis sativus seedlings were exposed to biotic (F. oxysporum inoculation) and abiotic stress conditions (heat and water deficit). The impact of M. guilliermondii on treated plants’ physiology, growth, development, and flowering was assessed. The study confirmed the biocontrol activity of M. guilliermondii against F. oxysporum and highlighted its positive effects as a plant growth promoter. It enhanced overall plant health, activated natural defense mechanisms against F. oxysporum, and alleviated the detrimental impacts of abiotic stress. Notably, M. guilliermondii also induced early flowering in cucumber plants. This research underscores the potential of M. guilliermondii as a biocontrol agent for managing Fusarium wilt, enhancing stress tolerance, promoting early flowering, and offering promising prospects for sustainable crop production amidst fungal diseases and climate change-induced stressors. The findings emphasize the importance of utilizing M. guilliermondii to improve cucumber crop productivity and address food scarcity challenges.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agriculture14071189

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Paris, 2011, Occidental diffusion of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) 500–1300 CE: Two routes to Europe, Ann. Bot., 109, 117, 10.1093/aob/mcr281 · DOI
  2. Wan, 2017, Effect of biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens SN16-1 and plant pathogen Fusarium oxysporum on tomato rhizosphere bacterial community composition, Biol. Control, 112, 1, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.05.014 · DOI
  3. Scarlett, 2013, Detection and quantification of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum in environmental samples using a specific quantitative PCR assay, Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 137, 315, 10.1007/s10658-013-0244-1 · DOI
  4. Kim, 2015, Antagonistic activities of novel peptides from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PT14 against Fusarium solani and Fusarium oxysporum, J. Agric. Food Chem., 63, 10380, 10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04068 · DOI
  5. Abro, 2019, Biocontrol potential of fungal endophytes against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp., cucumerinum causing wilt in cucumber. Plant Pathol. J., 35, 598
  6. Lan, 2023, Screening, Identification and Biocontrol Effect of Antagonistic Strain against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum, Chin. J. Biol. Control, 39, 184
  7. Palmieri, D., Ianiri, G., Conte, T., Castoria, R., Lima, G., and De Curtis, F. (2022). Influence of Biocontrol and Integrated Strategies and Treatment Timing on Plum Brown Rot Incidence and Fungicide Residues in Fruits. Agriculture, 12. · DOI
  8. Bita, C.E., and Gerats, T. (2013). Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: Scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front. Plant Sci., 4. · DOI
  9. Ortiz, 2008, Mejora de los recursos genéticos del trigo por parte del Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz y Trigo (CIMMYT), Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 55, 1095, 10.1007/s10722-008-9372-4 · DOI
  10. Caputo, 2004, Use of fluorescent amplified fragment length polymorphism (fAFLP) to identify specific molecular markers for the biocontrol agent Aureobasidium pullulans strain LS30, Postharvest Biol. Technol., 34, 179, 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.008 · DOI
  11. Liu, 2013, Utilization of antagonistic yeasts to manage postharvest fungal diseases of fruit, Int. J. Food Microbiol., 167, 153, 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.09.004 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Nakayan, 2013, Phosphate-solubilizing soil yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii CC1 improves maize (Zea mays L.) productivity and minimizes requisite chemical fertilization, Plant Soil, 373, 301, 10.1007/s11104-013-1792-z · DOI
  13. Kthiri, Z., Jabeur, M.B., Chairi, F., López-Cristoffanini, C., López-Carbonell, M., Serret, M.D., Araus, J.L., Karmous, C., and Hamada, W. (2021). Exploring the potential of Meyerozyma guilliermondii on physiological performances and defense response against Fusarium crown rot on durum wheat. Pathogens, 10. · DOI
  14. Arnold, 2003, Fungal endophytes limit pathogen damage in a tropical tree, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 15649, 10.1073/pnas.2533483100 · DOI
  15. Gouveia, 2020, Selenium toxicity stress-induced phenotypical, biochemical and physiological responses in rice plants: Characterization of symptoms and plant metabolic adjustment, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 202, 110916, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110916 · DOI
  16. Sharma, 2020, Photosynthetic response of plants under different abiotic stresses: A review, J. Plant Growth Regul., 39, 509, 10.1007/s00344-019-10018-x · DOI
  17. Tello, 2019, First Report of Fusarium equiseti Causing Vascular Wilt Disease on Vitis vinifera in Spain, Plant Dis., 103, 2471, 10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0067-PDN · DOI
  18. Alonso de Robador, J.M., Ortega Pérez, N., Sanchez-Ballesta, M.T., Tello Mariscal, M.L., Pintos López, B., and Gómez-Garay, A. (2023). Plant Defence Induction by Meyerozyma guilliermondii in Vitis vinifera L.. Agronomy, 13. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Schindelin, 2012, Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods, 9, 676, 10.1038/nmeth.2019 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lamelas, 2021, The rainbow protocol: A sequential method for quantifying pigments, sugars, free amino acids, phenolics, flavonoids, and MDA from a small amount of sample, Curr. Protoc., 44, 1977
  21. Wellburn, 1994, The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution, J. Plant Physiol., 144, 307, 10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2 · DOI
  22. Ezziyyani, 2004, Biocontrol by Streptomyces rochei -Ziyani-, of pepper rot (Capsicum annuum L.) caused by Phytophthora capsici, Anales Biología, 26, 69
  23. Savary, 2019, The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops, Nat. Ecol. Evol., 3, 430, 10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y · DOI · Paper page
  24. 2023, Unraveling efficient strategies for inducing systemic resistance in crops for managing biotic stress, Plant Stress, 8, 100156, 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100156 · DOI
  25. Agrios, G.N. (2005). Introduction to Plant Pathology, Elsevier Academic Press. · DOI
  26. Fravel, 2005, Commercialization and implementation of biocontrol, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 43, 337, 10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.032904.092924 · DOI
  27. Ongena, 2008, Bacillus lipopeptides: Versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol, Trends Microbiol., 16, 115, 10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009 · DOI
  28. Chaudhry, 2022, Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: A comprehensive review, Plant Cell Rep., 41, 1, 10.1007/s00299-021-02759-5 · DOI
  29. Yin, 2013, Impact of biocontrol agents Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24 and CPF10 on the bacterial community in the cucumber rhizosphere, Eur. J. Soil Biol., 59, 36, 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2013.09.001 · DOI
  30. Dong, 2012, Fusaric acid is a crucial factor in the disturbance of leaf water imbalance in Fusarium-infected banana plants, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 60, 171, 10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.08.004 · DOI
  31. Rodriguez, 2009, Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles, New Phytol., 182, 314, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02773.x · DOI
  32. Mitter, B., Petric, A., Shin, M.W., Chain, P.S., Hauberg-Lotte, L., Reinhold-Hurek, B., and Sessitsch, A. (2013). Comparative genome analysis of Burkholderia phytofirmans PsJN reveals a wide spectrum of endophytic lifestyles based on interaction strategies with host plants. Front. Plant Sci., 4. · DOI
  33. Takeno, 2016, Stress-induced flowering: The third category of flowering response, J. Exp. Bot., 67, 4925, 10.1093/jxb/erw272 · DOI
  34. Ausin, 2005, Environmental regulation of flowering, Int. J. Dev. Biol., 49, 689, 10.1387/ijdb.052022ia · DOI
  35. Kim, 2017, Colonization by the endophyte Piriformospora indica leads to early flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana likely by triggering gibberellin biosynthesis, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 490, 1162, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.06.169 · DOI
  36. Tao, 2018, Mutational studies of the Aux/IAA proteins in Physcomitrella reveal novel insights into their function, New Phytol., 218, 1534, 10.1111/nph.15039 · DOI
  37. Cho, 2017, The control of flowering time by environmental factors, Plant J., 90, 708, 10.1111/tpj.13461 · DOI
  38. Waqas, 2012, Endophytic fungi produce gibberellins and indoleacetic acid and promotes host-plant growth during stress, Molecules, 17, 10754, 10.3390/molecules170910754 · DOI
  39. Gechev, 2006, Reactive oxygen species as signals that modulate plant stress responses and programmed cell death, BioEssays, 28, 1091, 10.1002/bies.20493 · DOI
  40. Mesa-Marín, J., Del-Saz, N.F., Rodríguez-Llorente, I.D., Redondo-Gómez, S., Pajuelo, E., Ribas-Carbó, M., and Mateos-Naranjo, E. (2018). PGPR Reduce Root Respiration and Oxidative Stress Enhancing Spartina maritima Root Growth and Heavy Metal Rhizoaccumulation. Front. Plant Sci., 9. · DOI
  41. Oerke, 2006, Crop losses to pests, J. Agric. Sci., 144, 31, 10.1017/S0021859605005708 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Young, 1991, The photoprotective role of carotenoids in higher plants, Physiol. Plant., 83, 702, 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb02490.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gomez-Garay, A., Bonaventura Roca-Campos, D., Irles Sánchez, S., & Pintos López, B.
Affiliations
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, C/ José Antonio Novais, 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Venue
Agriculture
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-07-19
Volume
14
Issue
7
Pages
1189
ISSN
2077-0472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400808342
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agriculture (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
Candida guilliermondii, endophytic yeasts, biological control, Fusarium wilt, Fusarium oxysporum, cucumber, abiotic stress, drought stress, heat stress, plant growth promotion, early flowering, plant defense, climate change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review