The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbiological Safety of Chicken Litter or Chicken Litter-Based Organic Fertilizers: A Review
Open accessAbstract
Chicken litter or chicken litter-based organic fertilizers are usually recycled into the soil to improve the structure and fertility of agricultural land. As an important source of nutrients for crop production, chicken litter may also contain a variety of human pathogens that can threaten humans who consume the contaminated food or water. Composting can inactivate pathogens while creating a soil amendment beneficial for application to arable agricultural land. Some foodborne pathogens may have the potential to survive for long periods of time in raw chicken litter or its composted products after land application, and a small population of pathogenic cells may even regrow to high levels when the conditions are favorable for growth. Thermal processing is a good choice for inactivating pathogens in chicken litter or chicken litter-based organic fertilizers prior to land application. However, some populations may become acclimatized to a hostile environment during build-up or composting and develop heat resistance through cross-protection during subsequent high temperature treatment. Therefore, this paper reviews currently available information on the microbiological safety of chicken litter or chicken litter-based organic fertilizers, and discusses about further research on developing novel and effective disinfection techniques, including physical, chemical, and biological treatments, as an alternative to current methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Survival of Salmonella enterica Serovar Newport in Manure and Manure-Amended Soils
You, Y., Rankin, S. C., Aceto, H. W., Benson, C. E., Toth, J. D., & Dou, Z. (2006) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00791-06 · Cited by 188
Basics of Stress Adaptation and Implications in New-Generation Foods
Yousef, A., & Courtney, P. (2002) · Microbial Stress Adaptation and Food Safety · doi:10.1201/9781420012828.ch1 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Alegbeleye, O. O., Singleton, I., & Sant’Ana, A. S. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003 · Cited by 616
Plant antimicrobial polyphenols as potential natural food preservatives
Bouarab Chibane, L., Degraeve, P., Ferhout, H., Bouajila, J., & Oulahal, N. (2019) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.9357 · Cited by 469
V. T. Nair, D., Venkitanarayanan, K., & Kollanoor Johny, A. (2018) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods7100167 · Cited by 336
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Z., & Jiang, X.
- Venue
- Agriculture
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-01-28
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-29
- ISSN
- 2077-0472 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054393001
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 34.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbiological Safety of Chicken Litter or Chicken Litter-Based Organic Fertilizers: A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/agriculture4010001
- The paper
- Chen, Z., & Jiang, X. (2014). Microbiological Safety of Chicken Litter or Chicken Litter-Based Organic Fertilizers: A Review. Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture4010001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.