The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Automatic and Reliable Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques
Open accessAbstract
Plants are a major source of food for the world population. Plant diseases contribute to production loss, which can be tackled with continuous monitoring. Manual plant disease monitoring is both laborious and error-prone. Early detection of plant diseases using computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) can help to reduce the adverse effects of diseases and also overcome the shortcomings of continuous human monitoring. In this work, we propose the use of a deep learning architecture based on a recent convolutional neural network called EfficientNet on 18,161 plain and segmented tomato leaf images to classify tomato diseases. The performance of two segmentation models i.e., U-net and Modified U-net, for the segmentation of leaves is reported. The comparative performance of the models for binary classification (healthy and unhealthy leaves), six-class classification (healthy and various groups of diseased leaves), and ten-class classification (healthy and various types of unhealthy leaves) are also reported. The modified U-net segmentation model showed accuracy, IoU, and Dice score of 98.66%, 98.5%, and 98.73%, respectively, for the segmentation of leaf images. EfficientNet-B7 showed superior performance for the binary classification and six-class classification using segmented images with an accuracy of 99.95% and 99.12%, respectively. Finally, EfficientNet-B4 achieved an accuracy of 99.89% for ten-class classification using segmented images. It can be concluded that all the architectures performed better in classifying the diseases when trained with deeper networks on segmented images. The performance of each of the experimental studies reported in this work outperforms the existing literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., & Sun, G. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00745 · Cited by 35,667
Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-Based Localization
Selvaraju, R. R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., & Batra, D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2017.74 · Cited by 24,513
EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks
Tan, M., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.11946 · Cited by 17,072
Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks
Hu, J., Shen, L., Albanie, S., Sun, G., & Wu, E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2019.2913372 · Cited by 12,157
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
(2022) · Permanent Missions to the United Nations · doi:10.18356/9789210018289c230 · Cited by 5,384
OERKE, E.-C. (2006) · The Journal of Agricultural Science · doi:10.1017/s0021859605005708 · Cited by 5,283
Grad-CAM++: Generalized Gradient-Based Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networks
Chattopadhay, A., Sarkar, A., Howlader, P., & Balasubramanian, V. N. (2018) · 2018 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2018.00097 · Cited by 3,639
MnasNet: Platform-Aware Neural Architecture Search for Mobile
Tan, M., Chen, B., Pang, R., Vasudevan, V., Sandler, M., Howard, A., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00293 · Cited by 3,416
Attention gated networks: learning to leverage salient regions in medical images
Schlemper, J., Oktay, O., Schaap, M., Heinrich, M., Kainz, B., Glocker, B., & Rueckert, D. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.01.012 · Cited by 2,014
Cited by
Applications of deep learning in precision weed management: A review
Rai, N., Zhang, Y., Ram, B. G., Schumacher, L., Yellavajjala, R. K., Bajwa, S., & Sun, X. (2023) · Computers and Electronics in Agriculture · doi:10.1016/j.compag.2023.107698 · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Chowdhury, M. E. H., Rahman, T., Khandakar, A., Ayari, M. A., Khan, A. U., Khan, M. S., Al-Emadi, N., Reaz, M. B. I., Islam, M. T., & Ali, S. H. M.
- Venue
- AgriEngineering
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-05-20
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 294-312
- ISSN
- 2624-7402 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3163885127
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 32.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic and Reliable Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/agriengineering3020020
- The paper
- Chowdhury, M. E. H., Rahman, T., Khandakar, A., Ayari, M. A., Khan, A. U., Khan, M. S., Al-Emadi, N., Reaz, M. B. I., Islam, M. T., & Ali, S. H. M. (2021). Automatic and Reliable Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques. AgriEngineering. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering3020020
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.