Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 401

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic and Reliable Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques

Open access
Chowdhury, Muhammad E. H., Rahman, Tawsifur, Khandakar, Amith, Ayari, Mohamed Arselene, Khan, Aftab Ullah, Khan, Muhammad Salman, Al-Emadi, Nasser, Reaz, Mamun Bin Ibne, Islam, Mohammad Tariqul, Ali, Sawal Hamid Md·2021·AgriEngineering

Abstract

Plants are a major source of food for the world population. Plant diseases contribute to production loss, which can be tackled with continuous monitoring. Manual plant disease monitoring is both laborious and error-prone. Early detection of plant diseases using computer vision and artificial intelligence (AI) can help to reduce the adverse effects of diseases and also overcome the shortcomings of continuous human monitoring. In this work, we propose the use of a deep learning architecture based on a recent convolutional neural network called EfficientNet on 18,161 plain and segmented tomato leaf images to classify tomato diseases. The performance of two segmentation models i.e., U-net and Modified U-net, for the segmentation of leaves is reported. The comparative performance of the models for binary classification (healthy and unhealthy leaves), six-class classification (healthy and various groups of diseased leaves), and ten-class classification (healthy and various types of unhealthy leaves) are also reported. The modified U-net segmentation model showed accuracy, IoU, and Dice score of 98.66%, 98.5%, and 98.73%, respectively, for the segmentation of leaf images. EfficientNet-B7 showed superior performance for the binary classification and six-class classification using segmented images with an accuracy of 99.95% and 99.12%, respectively. Finally, EfficientNet-B4 achieved an accuracy of 99.89% for ten-class classification using segmented images. It can be concluded that all the architectures performed better in classifying the diseases when trained with deeper networks on segmented images. The performance of each of the experimental studies reported in this work outperforms the existing literature.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agriengineering3020020

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

See all 401

Metadata

Authors
Chowdhury, M. E. H., Rahman, T., Khandakar, A., Ayari, M. A., Khan, A. U., Khan, M. S., Al-Emadi, N., Reaz, M. B. I., Islam, M. T., & Ali, S. H. M.
Venue
AgriEngineering
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-20
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
294-312
ISSN
2624-7402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3163885127
Cited by
401
References
44
FWCI
32.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Automatic and Reliable Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/agriengineering3020020
The paper
Chowdhury, M. E. H., Rahman, T., Khandakar, A., Ayari, M. A., Khan, A. U., Khan, M. S., Al-Emadi, N., Reaz, M. B. I., Islam, M. T., & Ali, S. H. M. (2021). Automatic and Reliable Leaf Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Techniques. AgriEngineering. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering3020020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.