Cited by 7Medicinal Plants and NeuroprotectionPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesMedicinal Plant Research

The Effect of Production and Post-Harvest Processing Practices on Quality Attributes in Centella asiatica (L.) Urban—A Review

Open access
Singh, Rambir, Kharsyntiew, Balasiewdor, Sharma, Poonam, Sahoo, Uttam Kumar, Sarangi, Prakash Kumar, Prus, Piotr, Imbrea, Florin·2023·Agronomy

Abstract

Centella asiatica is well known for its miraculous therapeutic properties in various systems of traditional medicine across the world. However, significant variation in its pharmacological activities has been reported due to the unavailability of quality raw material and non-standardized formulations. A number of research papers have been published on the collection of C. asiatica plants from different regions for the identification of a suitable agroclimate with elite germplasms. Efforts have been made to standardize production and post-harvest practices for the availability of quality raw material with a high centelloside content. The ecological niche modeling approach revealed that the Indian subcontinent has high climatic suitability for the production of C. asiatica, and genotypes with a high content of centelloside were predominantly found in the Western Ghats, North East, Eastern Himalaya and Western Himalaya in India. Open cultivation of C. asiatica is more suitable in these agroclimatic zones in India. Cultivation under shade is also suitable in the plains of Central India. Hydroponic and tissue culture of C. asiatica has also been successfully established for the enhanced production of centelloside using supplements and elicitors such as sucrose, auxins, cytokinins, kinetin, methyl jasmonate, etc. Freeze drying has been identified as the most efficient post-harvest method for the high pharmacological activities of C. asiatica extracts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy13081999

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singh, R., Kharsyntiew, B., Sharma, P., Sahoo, U. K., Sarangi, P. K., Prus, P., & Imbrea, F.
Affiliations
  • Mizoram University (IN)
  • Indira Gandhi National Tribal University (IN)
  • Central Agricultural University (IN)
  • Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology (PL)
  • Univesity of Life Science "King Mihai I" from Timisoara (RO)
Corresponding author
  • Singh, Rambir
  • Sahoo, Uttam Kumar
  • Imbrea, Florin
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-07-28
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1999
ISSN
2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385342056
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • scheme “Increasing the impact of excellence research on the capacity for innovation and technology transfer within USV Timișoara (6PFE)
  • University of Life Sciences “King Mihai I”, Romania (6PFE)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plants and Neuroprotection
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
Centella asiatica, centellosides, post-harvest processing, cultivation techniques, agroclimatic suitability, ecological niche modeling, germplasm, shade cultivation, hydroponics, tissue culture, elicitors, freeze-drying, raw material quality, pharmacological activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review