Cited by 81Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsAgricultural Science and FertilizationMycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions

Long-term effects of biochar-based organic amendments on soil microbial parameters

Open access
Brtnicky, Martin, Dokulilova, Tereza, Holatko, Jiri, Pecina, Vaclav, Kintl, Antonin, Latal, Oldrich, Vyhnanek, Tomas, Prichystalova, Jitka +1 more·2019·Agronomy

Abstract

Biochar application to the soil has been recommended as a carbon (C) management approach to sequester C and improve soil quality. Three-year experiments were conducted to investigate the interactive effects of three types of amendments on microbial biomass carbon, soil dehydrogenase activity and soil microbial community abundance in luvisols of arable land in the Czech Republic. Four different treatments were studied, which were, only NPK as a control, NPK + cattle manure, NPK + biochar and NPK + combination of manure with biochar. The results demonstrate that all amendments were effective in increasing the fungal and bacterial biomass, as is evident from the increased values of bacterial and fungal phospholipid fatty acid analysis. The ammonia-oxidizing bacteria population increases with the application of biochar, and it reaches its maximum value when biochar is applied in combination with manure. The overall results suggest that co-application of biochar with manure changes soil properties in favor of increased microbial biomass. It was confirmed that the application of biochar might increase or decrease soil activity, but its addition, along with manure, always promotes microbial abundance and their activity. The obtained results can be used in the planning and execution of the biochar-based soil amendments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/agronomy9110747

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brtnicky, M., Dokulilova, T., Holatko, J., Pecina, V., Kintl, A., Latal, O., Vyhnanek, T., Prichystalova, J., & Datta, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of geology and pedology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
  • Agriculture Research, Ltd., Troubsko 66441, Czech Republic
  • Agrovyzkum Rapotin, Ltd., Rapotin 78813, Czech Republic
  • Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
  • Department of Agrochemistry, Soil Science, Microbiology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of AgriSciences, Mendel University in Brno, Brno 61300, Czech Republic
  • Mendel University in Brno (CZ)
Corresponding author
Datta, Rahul
Venue
Agronomy
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-11-12
Volume
9
Issue
11
Pages
747
ISSN
2073-4395 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2986866351
Cited by
81
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 1
FWCI
8.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Agronomy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Keywords
biochar, organic amendments, soil microbial biomass, soil dehydrogenase activity, soil microbial communities, cattle manure, phospholipid fatty acids, ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, carbon sequestration, Luvisols, arable land, NPK fertilization, long-term effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review