Cited by 7Robot Manipulation and LearningSocial Robot Interaction and HRIRobotics and Automated Systems

Collaborative Robots with Cognitive Capabilities for Industry 4.0 and Beyond

Open access
Sandini, Giulio, Sciutti, Alessandra, Morasso, Pietro·2024·AI

Abstract

The robots that entered the manufacturing sector in the second and third Industrial Revolutions (IR2 and IR3) were designed for carrying out predefined routines without physical interaction with humans. In contrast, IR4* robots (i.e., robots since IR4 and beyond) are supposed to interact with humans in a cooperative way for enhancing flexibility, autonomy, and adaptability, thus dramatically improving productivity. However, human–robot cooperation implies cognitive capabilities that the cooperative robots (CoBots) in the market do not have. The common wisdom is that such a cognitive lack can be filled in a straightforward way by integrating well-established ICT technologies with new AI technologies. This short paper expresses the view that this approach is not promising and suggests a different one based on artificial cognition rather than artificial intelligence, founded on concepts of embodied cognition, developmental robotics, and social robotics. We suggest giving these IR4* robots designed according to such principles the name CoCoBots. The paper also addresses the ethical problems that can be raised in cases of critical emergencies. In normal operating conditions, CoCoBots and human partners, starting from individual evaluations, will routinely develop joint decisions on the course of action to be taken through mutual understanding and explanation. In case a joint decision cannot be reached and/or in the limited case that an emergency is detected and declared by top sec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ai5040092

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hybrid AI methods integrating fuzzy logic, neural networks, and reinforcement learning with a three-layer fusion model improve efficiency in multi-agent human-robot collaboration with moderate overhead.

    “Hybrid Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods integrate fuzzy logic, neural networks, and RL with a three-layer fusion model, improving efficiency in multi-agent HRC [8,41], with moderate overhead [42].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandini, G., Sciutti, A., & Morasso, P.
Affiliations
Italian Institute of Technology (IT)
Corresponding author
Morasso, Pietro
Venue
AI
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-10-09
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
1858-1869
ISSN
2673-2688 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403303190
Cited by
7
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AI (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fondazione Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, RBCS Department, in relation with the iCog Initiative (804388)
  • European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (804388)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
Keywords
collaborative robots, human-robot collaboration, Industry 4.0, artificial cognition, embodied cognition, developmental robotics, social robotics, shared decision-making, human-robot interaction, manufacturing automation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review