Cited by 8Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAmphibian and Reptile BiologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Western Hognose Snakes (Heterodon nasicus) Prefer Environmental Enrichment

Open access
Nagabaskaran, Gokulan, Skinner, Morgan, Miller, Noam·2022·Animals

Abstract

The environmental enrichment needs of snakes are often disregarded. Using preference testing, we aimed to shed light on the enrichment preferences of a popular pet species, the western hognose snake (Heterodon nasicus). Snakes’ enclosures were divided into enriched and standard sides. The enriched half had substrate for burrowing, interactive stimuli, and a large water dish. The standard half had paper towel substrate and a small water dish. Each side also contained a single shelter. We provided belly heat to create a thermal gradient on one side of the cage. Snakes were observed for 6 days, four times daily. We predicted a preference for enriched conditions and, as snakes are ectothermic, a preference for the warmer side. Snakes were additionally given an exploration assay, to explore whether differences in preference for environmental enrichment interact with boldness levels. We found that hognose snakes preferred enrichment, and the strength of this preference increased over time. Preference for enrichment was stronger when the enriched side was cooler. This may be due to the burrowing tendencies of these snakes. We found no relationship between preference and boldness. These findings emphasise the importance of preference testing in establishing research-informed enrichment opportunities for reptiles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani12233347

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social enrichment is necessary for health and well-being in mammals, and there is growing awareness of its importance to reptiles and amphibians.

    “Social enrichment is widely understood to be necessary for health and well-being in mammals, and there is a growing awareness of its importance to reptiles and amphibians [67,68].”

    From The social origins of consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [67]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says environmental enrichment has documented benefits in mammals and that evidence of benefits in reptiles is growing. It defines enrichment as potentially including conspecifics, but does not establish that social enrichment is necessary for mammalian health and well-being or discuss its importance to amphibians. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]Young R.J. Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2013
  2. [34]Jeffreys H. The Theory of Probability Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 1961

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagabaskaran, G., Skinner, M., & Miller, N.
Affiliations
Wilfrid Laurier University (CA)
Corresponding author
Nagabaskaran, Gokulan
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-11-29
Volume
12
Issue
23
Pages
3347
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4310375419
Cited by
8
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) (RGPIN-2016-06138)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Amphibian and Reptile Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Heterodon nasicus, environmental enrichment, temperature gradient, boldness, exploratory behavior, reptile welfare, preference test

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review