Cited by 14Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesAnimal health and immunologyEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

A survey of calf housing facilities pre-weaning, management practices and farmer perceptions of calf welfare on Irish dairy farms

Open access
Sinnott, Alison M., Bokkers, Eddie A. M., Murphy, John Paul, Kennedy, Emer·2023·Animals

Abstract

It is unknown whether calf rearing facilities in the Republic of Ireland are fit for purpose, or if facilities sufficiently consider calf and farmer welfare. The aim of this study was to review current calf housing facilities and management practices on Irish farms to determine if calves are reared in structurally appropriate facilities with management decisions that safeguard calf and farmer welfare. Fifty-one farms located in the Munster region in the Republic of Ireland were visited twice: (1) Pre-calving (December–January) and (2) During peak calving (January–March). During visit one, herd owners completed a questionnaire regarding calf housing and management practices on-farm and each facility used to rear calves was measured (measurement of cubic air capacity, ventilation, pen area, drainage etc.) without calves being present. Visit two consisted of a short interview with the principal calf manager to validate previously asked questions and environmental based measurements of each calf house that had been recorded, with any deviation from the first visit noted (measurements of temperature, wind speed, light intensity, facility provisions in-house and in-pen; calves present). Average herd size was 254, operating a spring calving system with a median calving season length of 11.6 weeks. While most farms expanded (88%; N = 51), this did not appear to have negatively affected calf space allowances (9.9% houses overcrowded at a space allowance of 1.5 m2/calf; N = 121). Calves were most commonly housed in group sizes of <12 (71.6% of all groupings; N = 394), with farmers moving away from individual housing for a period immediately post-birth, to grouping them immediately instead (58.8%; N = 51). The number of farmers testing colostrum was 31.4% (N = 51). Although the calving season was compact, most farmers were unconcerned about the upcoming spring workload (58.8%; N = 51). Farms appeared sufficiently prepared for spring, with most using the same number or less sheds during visit two than declared in visit one (76.5%; N = 51). To conclude, farmers made sufficient provision for calf housing and space allowances for calves that facilitated group housing post-birth. While structural and management components of rearing systems appear in line with sectoral recommendations, certain areas require attention on many farms (e.g., colostrum testing) to safeguard calf welfare and reduce the workload associated with calf rearing for farmers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ani13061019

Cites

56 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Calves are commonly fed 3 L of milk or milk replacer twice a day in Ireland.

    “Regulations do not state the amount of milk (replacer) that must be fed, but calves are commonly fed 3 L of milk or milk replacer twice a day in Ireland (9).”

    From Effect of source and journey on physiological variables in calves transported by road and ferry between Ireland and the Netherlands (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    Results §3.8 reports that bull calves were mainly offered whole milk and heifers predominantly milk replacer, and that some farms switched from twice-daily to once-daily feeding. Its 2–3 L figure refers to the first feed of colostrum, not a routine serving of milk or replacer. The paper therefore does not establish that calves commonly receive 3 L twice a day; §2.1 also cautions that the surveyed farms are not representative of all Ireland. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [2]Forde A. Over 1000 New Entrants to Dairy Post-Quota. Irish Farmers Journal. Last Updated: 17 March 2021 Available online: https://www.farmersjournal.ie/over-1-000-new-entrants-to-dairy-post-quota-602702 (accessed on 30 August 2022)
  2. [4]EU Council Directive 2008/119/EC Laying Down Minimum Standards for the Protection of Calves. Official Journal of the European Union. 2008. 1 Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0119 (accessed on 30 August 2022)
  3. [9]AHI 2021a. Converting Existing Houses into Calf Accommodation. Animal Health Ireland. 3–6 Available online: https://animalhealthireland.ie/assets/uploads/2021/10/AHI-Bulletin-October-2021-FINAL.pdf?dl=1 (accessed on 30 August 2022)
  4. [21]DAFM Minimum specification for calf housing. Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine 2016, pp. 1–12 Available online: https://www.gov.ie/en/collection/65f5b-tams-farm-building-and-structures-specifications/ (accessed on 30 August 2022)
  5. [22]McGuirk S.M. Steps I. Solving calf morbidity and mortality problems Proceedings of the American Association of Bovine Practitioners, 36th Annual Conference Columbus, OH, USA 1–13 September 2003
  6. [49]Schaufeli W.B. Leiter M.P. Maslach C. Jackson S.E. The MBI General Survey Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual Maslach C. Jackson S.E. Leiter M.P. Consulting Psychologist Press Palo Alto, CA, USA 1996 19 26
  7. [70]Fleming A. A Suggested Approach to Help Improve Farmers’ FINANCIAL literacy and Business Management Skills on-FARM. Kellogg Rural Leadership Programme. 2020, 1, 1–25 Available online: https://ruralleaders.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Fleming-Annie_Kellogg-Report-final.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2022)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sinnott, A. M., Bokkers, E. A. M., Murphy, J. P., & Kennedy, E.
Affiliations
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Emer
Venue
Animals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-03-10
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
1019
ISSN
2076-2615 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4324091511
Cited by
14
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Animals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Walsh Fellowship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
Keywords
calf housing, calf welfare, dairy farms, group housing, farmer perceptions, ventilation, spring calving, Irish dairy farms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review