Cited by 39Animal Disease Management and EpidemiologyMicrobial infections and disease researchAnimal health and immunology

Biosecurity practices in Belgian veal calf farming: level of implementation, attitudes, strengths, weaknesses and constraints

Open access
Damiaans, Bert, Renault, Véronique, Sarrazin, Steven, Berge, Anna Catharina, Pardon, Bart, Ribbens, Stefaan, Saegerman, Claude, Dewulf, Jeroen·2019·Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Abstract

The shift from cure toward prevention in veterinary medicine involves the implementation of biosecurity. In cattle farming, the application of biosecurity measures has been described to a limited degree, yet no data on biosecurity on veal farms is available. A high degree of commingling of veal calves from multiple farms causes frequent disease outbreaks, and thereby high antimicrobial usage and increased risk of antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the current implementation of biosecurity on veal farms in Belgium. To this extent, a list of the most important calf diseases (n = 34) was created, and risk factors and related biosecurity measures for these diseases were determined and included in a questionnaire. Herd visits and face-to-face interviews were conducted on 20 randomly selected veal farms, comprising 8.3% of the target population. A categorical principal component and clustering analysis were performed to determine the influence of the veal companies on the farms' biosecurity level. Awareness of biosecurity was very low among the farmers. All farms used an "all-in, all-out" production system with calves originating from multiple farms without quarantine. On average, farms were filled in 11.4 days (range 2-52). The degree of commingling for these farms was 1.24, meaning that, on average, 124 calves originated from 100 farms. Veterinarians wore farm-specific boots on eight farms (40%) and farm-specific clothes on six farms (30%), while technical advisors wore farm-specific boots on six farms (30%) and farm-specific clothes on four farms (20%). Disinfection footbaths were only used in five farms (25%) despite being present in all farms in the sample. Concerning internal biosecurity, none of the farmers isolated sick animals; only one farmer (5%) had a physically separated hospital pen, and only 11 farmers (55%) both cleaned and disinfected the stables after each production cycle. In most farms, animals were of comparable age. Healthy calves generally remained in the same compartment during the entire production cycle, limiting the risks associated with the movement of animals. No influence of the integrations on the biosecurity level could be determined. It can be concluded that a few biosecurity measures, such as "'all-in, all-out" and compartmentation, are implemented relatively well, while other measures, such as good cleaning and disinfection and proper entrance measures for visitors and personnel can easily be improved. The improvement of measures regarding the introduction of animals of different origins will require more fundamental changes in the veal industry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104768

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Transport, in most cases, involves the commingling of calves, and this poses a high risk for the spread of pathogens.

    “Transport, in most cases, involves the commingling of calves, and this poses a high risk for the spread of pathogens (39).”

    From Effect of source and journey on physiological variables in calves transported by road and ferry between Ireland and the Netherlands (2023) · cites this paper as [39]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes transport and commingling of veal calves as aggravating disease-introduction risk by increasing susceptibility to new infections. It does not establish that transport involves commingling in most cases or specifically characterize the risk of pathogen spread during transport as high. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brown Claxton Global veal market overview presentation International Veal Conference Noordwijk aan Zee, the Netherlands 2011

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Damiaans, B., Renault, V., Sarrazin, S., Berge, A. C., Pardon, B., Ribbens, S., Saegerman, C., & Dewulf, J.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • University of Liège (BE)
Corresponding author
Damiaans, Bert
Venue
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
172
Pages
104768
ISSN
0167-5877 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972002518
Cited by
39
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Preventive Veterinary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
FOD Volksgezondheid, Veiligheid van de Voedselketen en Leefmilieu
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
Keywords
calf diseases, disinfection, foot bath, herd health, farmer attitudes, antimicrobial resistance, disease prevention, Belgium, compartmentalization, risk factors, outbreak, antimicrobial use
MeSH terms
Farmers, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Belgium, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Communicable Disease Control, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review