The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial Species Isolated from Infected Wounds and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis: Data Emerging from a Three-Years Retrospective Study
Open accessAbstract
The antimicrobial resistance is a topic of global interest in the treatment of wound infections. The goal of this retrospective study was both the identification of the microorganisms responsible for wound infections and the determination of their drug susceptibility pattern. The study was performed from 2017 to 2019 and included 239 patients. Thirty-four species were isolated by culture methods and identified and analysed for their susceptibility patterns to antimicrobials through the Walk Away automated system. The presence of one species was the most frequent condition (75.3%), whereas a co-infection was detected in 24.7% of samples. The most common species were Gram-negative (57.9%), amongst which the most prevalent were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (40.2%), Escherichia coli (20.7%), Proteus mirabilis (11.2%), and Acinetobacter baumannii/haemolyticus (9.5%). Gram-positive bacteria were observed in 36.6%, Staphylococcus aureus (79.4%) being the most predominant species. At least one resistance to antibiotics was detected in 88.2% of isolates, while a multi-drug-resistance versus no less than 6 antimicrobials was detected in 29.2% of isolates. Although multi-drug resistant species and co-infections were observed, those were less frequently observed at the wound site. These conditions make the microorganisms eradication more difficult. The detection of a polymicrobial infection and multi-drug resistant microorganisms followed by a proper therapeutic treatment would lead to the resolution of the infection, promoting wound healing and the limitation of the spread of antibiotic resistance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury
Mehta, R. L., Kellum, J. A., Shah, S. V., Molitoris, B. A., Ronco, C., Warnock, D. G., Levin, A., & the Acute Kidney Injury Network (2007) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc5713 · Cited by 7,048
Bad Bugs, No Drugs: No ESKAPE! An Update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Boucher, H. W., Talbot, G. H., Bradley, J. S., Edwards, J. E., Gilbert, D., Rice, L. B., Scheld, M., Spellberg, B., & Bartlett, J. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/595011 · Cited by 4,958
Federal Funding for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance in Nosocomial Pathogens: No ESKAPE
Rice, L. B. (2008) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/533452 · Cited by 2,310
Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments
Han, G., & Ceilley, R. (2017) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y · Cited by 2,096
Zimlichman, E., Henderson, D., Tamir, O., Franz, C., Song, P., Yamin, C. K., Keohane, C., Denham, C. R., & Bates, D. W. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9763 · Cited by 1,847
Targeting microbial biofilms: current and prospective therapeutic strategies
Koo, H., Allan, R. N., Howlin, R. P., Stoodley, P., & Hall-Stoodley, L. (2017) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2017.99 · Cited by 1,800
James, G. A., Swogger, E., Wolcott, R., Pulcini, E. D., Secor, P., Sestrich, J., Costerton, J. W., & Stewart, P. S. (2008) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2007.00321.x · Cited by 1,543
Anderl, J. N., Franklin, M. J., & Stewart, P. S. (2000) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.44.7.1818-1824.2000 · Cited by 958
Recent advances on antimicrobial wound dressing: A review
Simões, D., Miguel, S. P., Ribeiro, M. P., Coutinho, P., Mendonça, A. G., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.02.022 · Cited by 935
Li, B., & Webster, T. J. (2018) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.23656 · Cited by 907
Cited by
Tang, Q., Tan, Y., Leng, S., Liu, Q., Zhu, L., & Wang, C. (2024) · Materials Today Bio · doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101087 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Puca, V., Marulli, R. Z., Grande, R., Vitale, I., Niro, A., Molinaro, G., Prezioso, S., Muraro, R., & Di Giovanni, P.
- Venue
- Antibiotics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-09-24
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1162
- ISSN
- 2079-6382 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3204927134
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial Species Isolated from Infected Wounds and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis: Data Emerging from a Three-Years Retrospective Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/antibiotics10101162
- The paper
- Puca, V., Marulli, R. Z., Grande, R., Vitale, I., Niro, A., Molinaro, G., Prezioso, S., Muraro, R., & Di Giovanni, P. (2021). Microbial Species Isolated from Infected Wounds and Antimicrobial Resistance Analysis: Data Emerging from a Three-Years Retrospective Study. Antibiotics. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10101162
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.