Cited by 9COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Repurposing Anthelmintic Drugs for COVID-19 Treatment: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on Ivermectin and Mebendazole

Open access
Satyam, Shakta Mani, El-Tanani, Mohamed, Patni, Mohamed Anas, Rehman, Abdul, Wali, Adil Farooq, Rangraze, Imran Rashid, Babiker, Rasha, Rabbani, Syed Arman +2 more·2025·Antibiotics

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the urgent exploration of therapeutic options, including drug repurposing. Anthelmintic drugs such as ivermectin and mebendazole have garnered interest due to their potential antiviral and immunomodulatory properties. However, conflicting evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs) necessitates a comprehensive meta-analysis to determine their efficacy and safety in COVID-19 management. Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the clinical efficacy of ivermectin and mebendazole in treating COVID-19 by analyzing their impact on viral clearance, symptom resolution, hospitalization duration, and safety profiles. Methods: A systematic search of Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify RCTs published up to February 2025. Eligible studies included adult patients with confirmed COVID-19 who received ivermectin or mebendazole compared with a placebo or standard of care. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Statistical heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic, and pooled effect sizes were calculated for primary clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty-three RCTs (n = 12,345) were included, with twenty-one studies on ivermectin and two on mebendazole. The pooled analysis suggested no statistically significant improvement in viral clearance (p = 0.39), hospitalization duration (p = 0.15), or symptom resolution (p = 0.08) with ivermectin or mebendazole. However, individual studies indicated potential benefits, particularly for mebendazole, in reducing viral load and inflammation. Both drugs exhibited favorable safety profiles, with no significant increase in adverse events. Conclusions: The promising propensities observed in selected studies underscore the potential of ivermectin and mebendazole as adjunct therapies for COVID-19. With well-established safety profiles, immunomodulatory effects, and affordability, these drugs present strong candidates for further exploration. Advancing research through well-designed, large-scale RCTs will help unlock their full therapeutic potential and expand treatment options in the fight against COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/antibiotics14050459

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]Zoumpourlis V. Goulielmaki M. Rizos E. Baliou S. Spandidos D.A. The COVID-19 pandemic as a scientific and social challenge in the 21st century Mol. Med. Rep. 2020 22 3035 3048 10.3892/mmr.2020.11393 32945405 PMC7453598 · DOI
  2. [6]Mekala R. Global Epidemics and Pandemics in the Light of Civilization, Colonization and Globalization Its Impact on Environmental Health to Contain COVID-19 One Heath Approach is Mandate: A Review Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341180553_One_Health_Review_Article (accessed on 8 January 2025)
  3. [26]Khan S. Back to the Future-Solutions for Parasitic Problems Rahime Şimşek1, Aqsa Farooqui2, Salah-Ud-Din Khan3 and Parasitic Infections: Immune Responses and Therapeutics Wiley New York, NY, USA 2024 1 46

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satyam, S. M., El-Tanani, M., Patni, M. A., Rehman, A., Wali, A. F., Rangraze, I. R., Babiker, R., Rabbani, S. A., El-Tanani, Y., & Rizzo, M.
Affiliations
  • Ras al-Khaimah Medical and Health Sciences University (AE)
  • RAK College of Pharmacy, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah 11172, United Arab Emirates
  • Royal Cornwall Hospital Trust, NHS, Truro TR1 3LJ, UK
  • University of Palermo (IT)
Corresponding author
Satyam, Shakta Mani
Venue
Antibiotics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-04-30
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
459
ISSN
2079-6382 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410036563
Cited by
9
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antibiotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, drug repurposing, ivermectin, mebendazole, anthelmintics, antiviral therapy, viral clearance, symptom resolution, length of hospital stay, drug safety, adjunctive therapy, immunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review