Cited by 10EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesMuscle activation and electromyography studiesProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Detecting the Speed Change Intention from EEG Signals: From the Offline and Pseudo-Online Analysis to an Online Closed-Loop Validation

Open access
Quiles, Vicente, Ferrero, Laura, Iáñez, Eduardo, Ortiz, Mario, Cano, José M., Azorín, José M.·2022·Applied Sciences

Abstract

Control of assistive devices by voluntary user intention is an underdeveloped topic in the Brain–Machine Interfaces (BMI) literature. In this work, a preliminary real-time BMI for the speed control of an exoskeleton is presented. First, an offline analysis for the selection of the intention patterns based on the optimum features and electrodes is proposed. This is carried out comparing three different classification models: monotonous walk vs. increasing and decreasing change speed intentions, monotonous walk vs. only increasing intention, and monotonous walk vs. only decreasing intention. The results indicate that, among the features tested, the most suitable parameter to represent these models are the Hjorth statistics in alpha and beta frequency bands. The average offline classification accuracy for the offline cross-validation of the three models obtained is 68 ± 11%. This selection is also tested following a pseudo-online analysis, simulating a real-time detection of the subject’s intentions to change speed. The average results indices of the three models during this pseudoanalysis are of a 42% true positive ratio and a false positive rate per minute of 9. Finally, in order to check the viability of the approach with an exoskeleton, a case of study is presented. During the experimental session, the pros and cons of the implementation of a closed-loop control of speed change for the H3 exoskeleton through EEG analysis are commented.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/app12010415

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cohen, M.X. A tutorial on generalized eigendecomposition for source separation in multichannel electrophysiology. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2104.12356. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Quiles, V., Ferrero, L., Iáñez, E., Ortiz, M., Cano, J. M., & Azorín, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES)
  • Brain-Machine Interface System Lab, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, 03202 Elche, Spain
  • Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (ES)
Corresponding author
Quiles, Vicente
Venue
Applied Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
415
ISSN
2076-3417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206195853
Cited by
10
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033 (RTI2018-096677-B-I00)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
brain-computer interface, exoskeleton control, feedback control, assistive devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review